Skip to content
DevMeme
1594 of 7590
Frontend Post #1782 · source on Telegram

The Stack Overflow Déjà Vu of jQuery

Description

A two-panel meme featuring the character Lisa Simpson from 'The Simpsons' reacting to a common developer frustration. The top of the image has the caption: 'when you're searching for a Javascript answer but only Jquery answers shows up'. The first panel shows Lisa sitting on the floor, looking up with a hopeful and eager expression. The second panel shows her in the same position, but her smile has vanished, replaced by a deflated, disappointed frown as she looks down. This meme perfectly captures the pain of frontend developers who are looking for solutions in modern, vanilla JavaScript but find search results dominated by answers using the jQuery library. While historically important, jQuery is often considered a legacy dependency in many modern technology stacks, and finding only jQuery-based solutions feels like digging through outdated historical artifacts instead of relevant, modern-day code

Comments

7
Anonymous ★ Top Pick Searching for a vanilla JS solution and finding only jQuery is the modern equivalent of asking for a map and being handed a stone tablet
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    Searching for a vanilla JS solution and finding only jQuery is the modern equivalent of asking for a map and being handed a stone tablet

  2. Anonymous

    Googling “modern JS fetch retry logic” and Stack Overflow hands back a $.ajax success/error callback - like asking for a Kafka topology and getting a shell script that rsyncs log files; sure, it worked in 2010, but my dignity has an SLO now

  3. Anonymous

    It's 2024 and somehow every DOM manipulation answer still starts with '$(document).ready()' - at this point jQuery is less a library and more of a persistent haunting from the Web 2.0 era that refuses to leave our search results alone

  4. Anonymous

    The real tragedy isn't finding jQuery answers - it's realizing those Stack Overflow posts from 2012 have more upvotes than any modern solution, and now you're genuinely considering whether `$('.element').hide()` is actually cleaner than `document.querySelector('.element').style.display = 'none'` just to avoid the existential crisis of questioning a decade of collective developer wisdom

  5. Anonymous

    Googling a vanilla JS bug and only finding jQuery answers is the internet suggesting you fix a 10-line DOM problem by shipping 30KB of nostalgia to production

  6. Anonymous

    The SERP is eventually consistent with 2012: I asked for addEventListener and got a 90KB dependency plus $.ready

  7. Anonymous

    jQuery: the half-life of Stack Overflow answers outlasting your last monorepo migration

Use J and K for navigation