Databases
Post #7314 · source on Telegram
DuckDuckGo Search: /dev/null vs MongoDB Benchmark Bake-Off
Description
A screenshot of a DuckDuckGo search results page for the query 'dev/null vs mongodb'. The Search Assist AI summary earnestly compares /dev/null and MongoDB's performance differences, noting '/dev/null being optimized for speed but potentially sacrificing read reliability.' A Wayfair blog result titled '/dev/null vs. MongoDB benchmark bake-off' describes function-testing with Apache Bench. The absurdist humor is that /dev/null is Unix's black hole -- it discards all data written to it -- so 'comparing' it to MongoDB as a database is a joke about MongoDB's perceived unreliability with data. The AI search assistant treating this as a legitimate comparison makes it even funnier
More like this
More like this in Databases →
Use J and K for navigation
Comments
11Comment deleted
/dev/null vs MongoDB: identical write performance, but /dev/null is more honest about not giving your data back
An AI confidently explaining the pros and cons of /dev/null as a database is the perfect summary of the current tech hype cycle: technically impressive pattern matching with zero actual comprehension
TPC-Null results just dropped: infinite TPS, zero durability, and now the PM wants parity by Q3
After 15 years of optimizing database writes, I finally discovered the perfect solution with 100% write throughput and zero latency - /dev/null. The only downside is explaining to the CTO why our data recovery strategy involves quantum mechanics and prayer
Comparing /dev/null to MongoDB is like benchmarking a black hole against a filing cabinet - sure, one has infinite write throughput, but good luck with those read queries
The assistant’s take - “/dev/null writes faster than MongoDB but sacrifices read reliability” - checks out: writeConcern=0, read model=EOF, and a GDPR retention window of instant
/dev/null: the only DB nailing CAP by picking Availability and Partition tolerance, then ghosting Consistency forever
/dev/null must be scalable as fuck, because it can be used on client side, without any feature loss Comment deleted
Incorrect, browsers are yet to consistently implement /dev/null API. Until then, all your /dev/null writes will have GC overhead and excess memory footprint. Comment deleted
but it's user problem, not developer Comment deleted
It's like talking about zodiac signs with an astrologist. So generic that it becomes true😂😂 Comment deleted