Skip to content
DevMeme
6502 of 7663
WebDev Post #7127 · source on Telegram

HTML Was Naked For Four Years Before CSS Was Born

Description

A Twitter thread screenshot. Colin Armstrong (@colinarms) tweets: 'HTML is 28 years old. CSS is 24 years old. JavaScript is 25 years old.' (with a mind-blown emoji). Navdeep (@dev_navdeep) replies: 'So you are saying HTML was without clothes for 4 years.' (62 likes). Akshay Parmar (@_The_Akshay) adds: 'And without brain for 3 years.' (56 likes). The joke brilliantly personifies web technologies: CSS as HTML's clothing (visual styling) and JavaScript as its brain (logic/behavior), noting the gap years between their creation

Comments

26
Anonymous ★ Top Pick HTML spent 4 years unstyled and 3 years brainless - or as we call it today, a successful MVP launch strategy
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    HTML spent 4 years unstyled and 3 years brainless - or as we call it today, a successful MVP launch strategy

  2. Anonymous

    Given how many enterprise portals still look like 1995, it’s clear some products never scheduled that long-overdue wardrobe - or lobotomy - upgrade

  3. Anonymous

    After 28 years, HTML is finally old enough to realize that its mid-life crisis wasn't about getting a new framework every year, but accepting that tables were never meant for layout and divs aren't semantic enough for everything

  4. Anonymous

    This thread perfectly captures the awkward adolescence of the web stack: HTML strutting around in its semantic underwear for four years before CSS showed up with a wardrobe, then both of them sitting there like static mannequins for three more years until JavaScript finally gave them a personality. It's the tech equivalent of watching your framework mature from 'it renders' to 'it has opinions about everything' - except this evolution took nearly a decade and we're still dealing with the trauma of those formative years every time we have to support IE11

  5. Anonymous

    The web spent four years without CSS and three without JS, yet those pages still hit sub‑100ms TTFB - try that with a 2MB CSS‑in‑JS bundle

  6. Anonymous

    The web shipped structure first, styling later, and a JS brain last - then spent 25+ years inventing CSP, same‑origin, bundlers, and TypeScript to keep that brain from executing whatever the CDN sneezes in

  7. Anonymous

    HTML bootstrapped the web naked and brainless for years, yet it's still the only layer seniors trust when frameworks evaporate in prod

  8. @Danich 1y

    Those were beautiful and happy years

    1. @TheFloofyFloof 1y

      haunts you with ActiveX

      1. dev_meme 1y

        Choose your way warrior: ActiveX, Java Applet, or Flash/AS

        1. @TheFloofyFloof 1y

          Silverlight

          1. dev_meme 1y

            I will pretend that I never heard about Microsoft Flash 🌚

          2. @Khar0s 1y

            That was a decade later

    2. @arnonrdp 1y

      Only happy, not beautiful.

  9. @NickRaspy 1y

    the internet 1.0...

  10. @pooyabehravesh 1y

    I think we can all agree that it has brain now, but it is dumb as hell

  11. @H3R3T1C 1y

    HTML was great for 3 years

  12. @spacenuke 1y

    Document delivery platform with layer after layer of hack to make applications possible

  13. @spacenuke 1y

    We need to start over, the web is dead, now it’s just a way to deliver 50mb React apps

    1. @viktorrozenko 1y

      I feel the same to be honest with you. But backwards compatibility is a bitch. I feel like it’d have to be a huge project supported by the biggest tech companies where they’d develop something closer to Swift UI that initially transpiles to the regular old HTML, CSS, JS — but then just add direct support for it in the browser. So we’d be able to make full-blown apps and I think with such architecture these apps would be PWAs by default. If you want to install one — no need for additional config. Since it’s already an app.

      1. @DerKnerd 1y

        Google tried something like that in the early 2010s with Dart, it was intend as a successor to Javascript

      2. @spacenuke 1y

        No, you’ve just layered more shit on the cake

  14. @spacenuke 1y

    Time was an OS and browser fit in 1.44MB

  15. @spacenuke 1y

    What if I told you you could install another program on your computer that uses the Internet but is not a web browser

  16. @spacenuke 1y

    We just need that new browser: designed for purpose rather than evolving into shape

  17. @FunnyGuyU 1y

    I have mixed feelings about putting JS and brains in a single sentence.

Use J and K for navigation