Waiting for a Retro That Never Seems to End
Description
A black and white image styled like a theater poster for a play. At the top, in white text, it says 'Samuel Beckett's'. Below that, in larger text, 'WAITING FOR RETRO'. The scene depicts two silhouetted figures in bowler hats sitting at the base of a barren tree, with a large, full moon in the background. This is a direct visual parody of the famous absurdist play 'Waiting for Godot.' The technical joke equates the existential, endless waiting for the character Godot with the often drawn-out, seemingly pointless, or perpetually delayed retrospective meetings in Agile methodologies. For experienced developers, it's a humorous and cynical take on corporate agile rituals, suggesting they can feel as futile and unproductive as waiting for something that will never arrive
Comments
8Comment deleted
Our retrospectives feel like 'Waiting for Godot,' but instead of a no-show messenger, we get a Scrum Master insisting that if we just adjust our story points, meaningful change will *definitely* arrive next sprint
Sprint after sprint we wait by the Zoom link - monoliths shatter into microservices, then quietly re-coalesce - yet the retro invite remains “TBD”; turns out Agile is just Samuel Beckett with story points
After 15 years of 'continuous improvement,' I've realized our retrospectives are just distributed consensus algorithms where we all agree nothing will change - at least Paxos eventually converges
Much like Beckett's Vladimir and Estragon waiting endlessly for Godot who never arrives, senior engineers find themselves perpetually waiting for that 'retro' where leadership finally approves the legacy system rewrite - spoiler alert: it's always 'next quarter.' The absurdist parallel is uncanny: both involve repetitive dialogue, existential questioning of purpose, and the nagging suspicion that what you're waiting for might not actually exist. At least Beckett's characters had a tree for shade; we just have technical debt documentation gathering dust in Confluence
Our Scrum cadence follows the Beckett consistency model: the retro exists in the roadmap, but no process ever observes it
Godot at least spared them action items; retros deliver those eternally postponed
Enterprise Agile: “Waiting for Retro” - the recurring invite that keeps getting bumped to “async” until it becomes a Jira epic called “Continuous Improvement” with status “Backlog.”
Adore this joke! Comment deleted