Party meme reveals C++ secretly powering the web browsers critics use
Why is this Languages meme funny?
Level 1: Hidden Hero
Imagine a group of kids riding in a fancy toy car, laughing and saying, “Haha, who needs wheels on a car? Wheels are so useless for driving!” They’re having a great time, completely unaware of the obvious: the car needs its wheels to move. In fact, those plain, hidden wheels are quietly doing all the important work, while the kids only pay attention to the shiny paint and cool car design. The joke is that the kids don’t realize the thing they’re mocking is the very thing making their fun possible. In the same way, some people make fun of a “boring” old technology without realizing it’s the hidden hero holding everything up — just like wheels on a car or the foundation of a house that nobody notices but everyone relies on. It’s funny because without that unappreciated part, nothing would actually work, and the laughter would stop pretty quickly!
Level 2: Browser Building Blocks
This meme highlights a knowledge gap between different kinds of programming. C++ is a programming language often used for low-level programming – that means coding things like operating systems, game engines, or in this case, browser engines. It’s known for being very fast and efficient because it’s a compiled language (the code is translated directly into machine code that the computer’s hardware understands). However, C++ is not commonly used by web developers to make websites. Web development typically involves languages like JavaScript or Python, and web developers write code that runs inside the browser. So you might hear web folks say, “We don’t use C++ for web stuff” – which is true in the sense that they’re not writing their web app features in C++. But the funny twist is: the web browsers running all that JavaScript are themselves large programs written largely in C++!
In the “They don’t know” party meme image, the lone person with the hat has a text above them saying “They don’t know almost all web browsers are written in C++.” The group on the couch is labeled “people laughing about C++ being unsuitable for web development.” This captures a real scenario in tech culture: some developers joking that C++ isn’t for making web sites, while not realizing the browser engine (the software that actually displays web pages and runs web code) relies on C++. The meme uses that contrast for a laugh. Essentially, the group is unaware of how browsers work internally.
Let’s break it down with some key facts:
- Web browser: an application like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge that you use to view websites. Under the hood, each browser has an engine responsible for turning HTML, CSS, and JavaScript into the interactive pages you see.
- Browser engine: the core part of the browser that does the heavy lifting – parsing HTML, applying CSS, running JS, rendering graphics, etc. For example:
- Chrome and modern Edge use Blink, which comes from the Chromium project.
- Firefox uses Gecko (with parts of the newer Quantum engine).
- Safari (and older Chrome) use WebKit.
- C++ in browsers: All the engines above are written mostly in C++. This choice was made because browser engines need to be extremely fast and handle a lot of low-level tasks. C++ lets engineers optimize performance and manage system resources (memory, CPU) tightly.
To visualize which browsers use which engine and language, see this table:
| Browser | Engine Name | Main Implementation Language |
|---|---|---|
| Google Chrome, New Edge, Opera, Brave | Blink (Chromium) | C++ (primarily) |
| Mozilla Firefox | Gecko (Quantum) | C++ (with some Rust) |
| Apple Safari | WebKit | C++ (primarily) |
Nearly every popular browser falls into one of these engine families, and as you can see, C++ is the common denominator. Even newer initiatives to improve safety (like parts of Firefox now using Rust) are built to work alongside existing C++ code.
Now, why do people say “C++ isn’t for web development”? In everyday web development, you don’t code your page interactivity using C++ — you use HTML for content, CSS for styling, and JavaScript for behavior. C++ is considered low-level for typical web tasks; it doesn’t have built-in knowledge of web concepts like the DOM or HTTP in the way web-specific languages/frameworks do. Also, C++ requires managing memory manually (you have to allocate and free memory, which is tricky and can lead to bugs). Web developers prefer languages that handle memory for them and provide high-level libraries for things like making network requests or updating page elements easily. In short, C++ is powerful but more complex and error-prone for building application logic, whereas languages like JavaScript are easier and higher-level for that domain. So from a web dev’s perspective, writing a whole website in C++ would be like using a bulldozer to plant a flower — the wrong tool for the job.
However, that “bulldozer” (C++) is exactly what’s used to build the road that all the web cars drive on! The browser engine internals are implemented in C++ because when you’re writing something as large and performance-sensitive as Chrome or Firefox, you need that level of control. The engine deals with things like:
- Parsing text files (HTML, CSS, JS) into structured data in memory.
- Laying out thousands of elements (divs, buttons, images) on the screen according to CSS rules (a job that can involve complex math and algorithms).
- Rendering graphics (filling in pixels on your screen), often using the computer’s GPU via graphics APIs.
- Running JavaScript code — which means implementing a whole JavaScript virtual machine inside the browser.
- Handling user interactions (clicks, typing) and triggering the right responses (like running JS event handlers or re-rendering parts of the page).
- Communicating over the network (download the page, assets, talk HTTP/HTTPS) efficiently.
All these tasks need to happen quickly and often all at once. C++ programs can be multi-threaded (using multiple CPU cores), and can optimize at a very low level, which is why they chose it.
To make this more concrete, imagine what happens when a bit of JavaScript updates a web page. Say your web code does:
// JavaScript running in a web page:
document.getElementById("msg").innerText = "Hello!";
This one-liner finds an element with id "msg" and changes its text to “Hello!”. Simple, right? But under the hood, the browser engine has to do a lot:
// Simplified C++ pseudo-code inside the browser engine:
Node* node = domTree.findById("msg"); // locate the element in the DOM tree
if(node && node->isTextNode()) {
node->setTextContent("Hello!"); // update the text in the DOM
layoutEngine.markDirty(node); // mark for re-layout/repaint
// (browser will repaint this part of the page soon to show the new text)
}
In reality, the browser’s C++ code is much more complex, but it follows this idea. It searches the internal DOM (Document Object Model) structure (which is how the browser represents your page in memory as a tree of elements), updates the text, and then flags that part of the page to be redrawn so you see “Hello!” on screen. There are thousands of such functions in the engine handling every little thing you do on a web page.
The meme is funny to developers because it reminds us of this layered reality. People laughing in the meme think C++ has no role in making websites, but actually C++ code is running behind the scenes every time they open a webpage. In other words:
- Web developers write code in JavaScript (or TypeScript, etc.), but that code runs on a platform built in C++.
- Without that C++ browser engine, the JavaScript code wouldn’t have a runtime environment to execute in at all. The “high-level” stuff always needs some “low-level” support.
So, the language comparison here isn’t about which is better in general; it’s about using each language in its proper place. C++ shines in building the complex infrastructure of a browser. JavaScript (and friends) shine in creating the interactive content that the browser displays. The meme jokes about people not realizing this and underestimating C++’s contribution to WebDevelopment. Knowing this, you can appreciate the irony: the very browser tab showing someone’s tweet like “LOL who even uses C++ anymore?” is itself a product of millions of C++ code running flawlessly to render that tweet.
Level 3: The Secret Sauce
For seasoned developers, this meme hits on a classic irony in our field. It’s poking fun at the language suitability debate often heard among programmers. You’ll hear people at meetups or on forums chuckling, “Haha, who would ever use C++ for web stuff? That’s for games or old system programs!” Meanwhile, those same folks are coding their web apps in JavaScript, running in Chrome/Firefox – and that browser is quietly written in C++. The meme’s scenario has one lonely figure at a party who “knows” the truth, while a group is literally laughing about C++ being unsuitable for web development. It’s the classic “They don’t know” party meme format: the lone knowledgeable introvert versus the blissfully unaware crowd. Every experienced dev has had moments of being that lone person, thinking “If only they knew the full story…”.
The humor here comes from the disconnect between perception and reality. In the world of WebDevelopment, C++ is often seen as this low-level, archaic thing – something you’d rarely touch when building a website. Web developers live in a world of HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and maybe high-level frameworks; they might joke that C++ is as relevant to their job as assembly language or punch cards. It’s common developer humor to rib other languages: e.g., front-end folks teasing that C++ is too hard or unsafe, while systems programmers tease that JavaScript devs don’t know what pointers or memory management are. These are the lighthearted battles of the language wars. But the meme flips this on its head by revealing a “secret sauce” ingredient: the browser engine that all web dev relies on is written in the very language being mocked.
Seasoned devs find this funny because it’s a “gotcha” moment. It’s as if the group laughing at C++ is oblivious that their entire joke is being facilitated by C++ in the first place. An analogy among seniors might be: the car enthusiasts laughing at bicycle mechanics, not realizing their truck has a bicycle chain driving part of its engine (not literally true in cars, but you get the idea). We’ve all seen scenarios where a trendy high-level technology is built on top of an older, low-level technology that quietly does the heavy lifting. This meme is basically pointing out a form of dramatic irony: the audience (us, and the lone figure) knows something the laughing characters do not — that C++ is actually everywhere in their web experience.
In real life, if you’ve ever dug into how a browser works (perhaps while debugging a weird browser bug or reading up on browser engine internals), you quickly discover huge codebases in C++. For example, Chromium (the open-source core of Chrome and Edge) is millions of lines of C++ code. It handles everything from rendering HTML elements to handling TCP/IP network packets. Firefox’s Gecko engine similarly is largely C++, and Safari’s WebKit (which was Chrome’s ancestor) is also C++. There’s even a bit of tribal knowledge: many web developers eventually hear, with some surprise, that “actually, almost all web browsers are built in C++.” The meme just dramatizes that revelation.
One humorous real-world example: a developer might rant on a web forum about how “nobody uses C++ for web stuff anymore.” The punchline is that their rant itself is being displayed by a program (the browser) written in C++. It’s like complaining about the chef’s cooking while unknowingly eating a dish made by that very chef. LanguageComparison jokes aside, there’s a kernel of truth that seniors appreciate: each programming language has its niche, and C++’s niche is high-performance systems. It’s not that you’d write your website’s frontend in C++ (that would indeed be impractical for most cases), but you absolutely rely on C++ programs (browsers, servers, game engines, operating systems) to run the higher-level code.
Experienced developers also recall how we got here historically. In the early days of Mosaic and Netscape (the first browsers), those were written in C or C++ because there wasn’t an alternative – languages like JavaScript existed inside the browser, but the browser itself had to be close to the metal. Over time, browsers became even more capable (think of all the graphics acceleration, sandboxed iframes, developer tools, etc.), and C++ remained the tool of choice to implement those features efficiently. There have been attempts to make web frameworks in other languages or compile other languages to run in the browser (Java applets, Flash with ActionScript, more recently WebAssembly allowing C++ code to run inside the browser environment), but the host browser container is still C++ territory. Webdev_vs_systems_programming is a classic dichotomy: web developers create the content and apps, system programmers build the platforms and engines. This meme humorously bridges that gap by reminding everyone that, hey, these worlds aren’t isolated – they depend on each other.
So the “secret sauce” here is that boring old C++ is an unsung hero enabling all our slick modern web apps. It’s the code that runs when you open a tab, load a page, and click a button. If you push a browser hard (open 100 tabs or run an intensive game in WebGL), you’re really testing that C++ engine’s efficiency. When front-end devs joke that C++ has no place in web development, seniors laugh because they know low-level programming is literally sitting under the hood of every browser, keeping the web running smoothly. As the meme implies, the group at the party might be laughing at C++ — but the lone engineer with the party hat knows one day someone will blurt out, “...you do realize Chrome is written in C++, right?” and there’ll be an awkward, enlightening silence.
Level 4: C++ All the Way Down
Deep beneath the friendly UI of a web page, a browser engine operates like a high-performance orchestra in code. Major browsers (Chrome’s Blink, Firefox’s Gecko, Safari’s WebKit) are essentially giant C++ applications. Why C++? Because it’s a compiled language that turns code directly into machine instructions for the CPU, running at near-metal speed. At this level, we’re talking about low-level programming close to the hardware. The browser’s job is enormously demanding: it must parse HTML, apply CSS rules, execute JavaScript, and render graphics at lightning speed. To achieve this, browser engines leverage data structures and algorithms optimized in C++ for efficiency.
Consider what happens when you load a complex modern web app. The browser has to parse the text of HTML into a DOM (Document Object Model) tree, compute CSS style rules for potentially thousands of elements, run layout calculations (which can be as tricky as solving little constraint problems for every element’s size and position), and then render pixels to the screen—ideally 60 times a second for smooth animations. Each of those stages relies on algorithms that are careful about memory and speed. In C++ you can manage memory manually and use low-level optimizations (like custom memory allocators, bit-level operations, and CPU-specific instructions) to squeeze out performance. A high-level scripting language can’t easily give that kind of fine-grained control or speed, especially when doing heavy calculations repeatedly in a tight timeframe (like layout or image decoding loops).
Browser engine internals also include things like networking (handling HTTP requests), JavaScript execution, and even multimedia decoding. All of these are built in C++ (with maybe some assembly or Rust here and there) because that code needs to interface directly with the operating system and hardware. For example, the JavaScript engine inside Chrome (V8) or Firefox (SpiderMonkey) is itself written in C++ — it takes your JS code and JIT-compiles (just-in-time compiles) it into efficient machine code. Under the hood, the JS engine is doing advanced things like bytecode interpretation, optimizing hot functions, and garbage collecting memory. These are classic compiler and systems programming tasks, which C++ (and historically C) excel at. We’re essentially layering one runtime on top of another: your JS code runs on a virtual machine (V8) implemented in C++, which in turn runs on the actual machine hardware. It’s like abstraction on top of abstraction, but eventually you hit the layer written in a low-level language that does the heavy lifting.
This deep dependency on C++ is almost invisible to most users and even many developers. But it’s a fundamental engineering choice: to make WebDev run as fast as users expect, the browser’s core must be as efficient as possible. C++ isn’t magic — it’s constrained by the same physics (CPU cycles, memory bandwidth, etc.) as any language — but it allows finely tuned, high-performance code. It also means browser makers deal with classic C++ challenges like manual memory management and pointer bugs (many a tech humor post exists about browser crashes or security bugs due to things like buffer overflows in C++ code). In fact, the push for memory-safe languages like Rust in system components (Firefox’s Quantum project, for instance) came from these very real issues in C++ engines. Still, performance is king: rewriting entire engines in slower languages isn’t practical, so C++ remains deeply entrenched.
At this level, the meme’s truth emerges from fundamental CS realities: high-level web languages ultimately rely on low-level implementations. There’s an old saying that “all non-trivial abstractions, to some degree, are leaky” – here the “leak” (or rather, connection) is that even if web developers don’t touch C++ in their daily workflow, the effects of C++ are everywhere in their tools. The language wars about what’s “suitable” for web development ignore that every script is running on a runtime written in C++ (or similar). In other words, modern web software lives on a stack of abstractions, and at the base of that stack for browsers is C++ code executing at billions of CPU cycles per second to deliver those slick animations and responsive UIs. The meme cleverly points out this hidden truth: no matter how advanced our web development gets, under the hood, it’s C++ (and ultimately assembly) all the way down.
Description
Black-and-white line drawing of the classic “They don’t know” party meme: one lone figure at the left wearing a cone birthday hat and holding a drink, while a small group on the right chats around a couch. Above the isolated figure the text reads, “They don't know almost all web browsers are written in C++.” Across the group in the foreground a caption says, “people laughing about C++ being unsuitable for web development.” The joke contrasts common front-end developer banter that C++ is irrelevant to the web with the technical reality that major browser engines (Chromium, Gecko, WebKit) are primarily implemented in C++. It highlights how low-level systems code underpins everyday web experiences, poking fun at language debates within the developer community
Comments
86Comment deleted
Funny how the people tweeting “C++ is obsolete” from a 9 MB React bundle are really running it atop 10 million lines of C++ and silently praying today’s compositor-thread use-after-free stays below the crash-telemetry threshold
The same developers who mock C++ while debugging their 'blazingly fast' JavaScript framework have no idea their entire runtime is just a thin abstraction layer over millions of lines of carefully optimized C++ that actually makes the web work
The real joke is that while developers debate whether C++ is 'suitable' for web development, billions of users are literally running C++ every time they open a browser tab. It's like arguing whether steel is appropriate for building bridges while standing on the Golden Gate Bridge - the infrastructure already made the decision decades ago, and the performance requirements haven't gotten any less demanding
“C++ isn’t for web” - says the SPA running on a C++ JIT (V8) inside a C++ engine (Blink/Gecko) on a C kernel; abstraction is a hell of a drug
JavaScript “everywhere” stops where libblink starts; your SPA is a tiny script steering millions of lines of C++
Web devs mock C++ for web dev, forgetting their React apps run atop V8's C++ sorcery optimizing sloppy async hell
C++ rocks Comment deleted
Such idiots Comment deleted
Lmao Comment deleted
Chromium on c++ Comment deleted
I meant exactly what you saying Comment deleted
Mozilla: hippity hoppity Rust is my property Comment deleted
More like this: Mozilla: I think rust is neat Community: Hippity hoppity rust is my property Comment deleted
What's written here? Comment deleted
Thanks a lot Comment deleted
So it's an eternal arm wrestling between blazingly fast C++ against whale heavy web standards. One trying to slow down another while other trying to handle all of it mess. Comment deleted
And no. Not all of browsers. There's rust in FF no? Comment deleted
and c++ too Comment deleted
So that's why it still so crappy... Comment deleted
just how much did c++ hurt you? Comment deleted
this is what happens when you don't put your maid outfit for systems programming Comment deleted
Socks is not enough? Comment deleted
turns out it isn't Comment deleted
It's not how much it did hurt in the past (loved it during that time very much) it's the realisation how much life can be truly easy and much more fun if you take your head up. Comment deleted
it's easier but it also has a price of performance, only rust can compete with c++ in that regard, but it lacks a standart and maturity Comment deleted
Performance of the developer much more expensive than the hardware nowdays. Optimization may be done later if the scale really matters. Comment deleted
this statement, while true in some scenarios, results in slow and bloated code, and there are applications where performance actually matters Comment deleted
Prototyping and POC must be done fast. After you can achieve. And yeah electron based software is good example of useless and ruthless Comment deleted
C++ standards nowdays are a mess and horror. Comment deleted
but you can code in c while using g++ Comment deleted
* Comment deleted
Too low. No joy of higher abstraction. Still manual memory management he'll. Comment deleted
constructors and destructors can save you from that Comment deleted
Resources & memory leaks. Comment deleted
why? Comment deleted
You cannot simply cover all use cases with c/tors. Resources and shared state is one of the painful examples Comment deleted
ofc you can't cover all cases but it helps a lot Comment deleted
shared state is handled easily* with std::shared_ptr, even though you sould not have a lot of it in the first place; and i did not recall a single case when there was a resource leak because of a missing ctor Comment deleted
Shared state is not handled really in multithreaded solution. Not at all. Comment deleted
First of all, i think shared state is bad by itself, so i try to keep it minimal, but when there's no other way you just put mutex locks (or bottlenecks) and you're fine. Or better yet, just put const there Comment deleted
why not pipe() ? so u can do it just like with channels in golang Comment deleted
Isn't that unix exclusive? Comment deleted
yea, but windows also has pipes as i know so u can just write wrapper class or something Comment deleted
I tried pipes in Windows it's a hell. Comment deleted
Is there a single thing in windows that's not hell? Comment deleted
BDSM? Comment deleted
Hmm, it's hell but it should be, bc it's bdsm Comment deleted
BSOD BDSM Comment deleted
Yeah, but that's not standard, and does not scale well for many platforms Comment deleted
JVM solutions do. Especially stuff like Vert.x that scale from single thread into multiple clusters. Comment deleted
Well we have transactional memory tx, but it's not done yet, but i advise strongly for minimizing shared state in the first place Comment deleted
But transactional memory is just compiler putting all the locks in the right places Comment deleted
none Comment deleted
but better than no standardization at all Comment deleted
just small part Comment deleted
So rust doesn't help much, huh? Comment deleted
kinda Comment deleted
I head a dream when I was kid and learned to load resources of the desktop app from the net, that instead of HTML it's better to do app that can load its UI from the net and you just ship the minimal executable. Everybody laughed at me. Now we're moving towards web asm so basically it gonna be the same just instead of tiny executable it will be bloated browser with a built in runtime very much JVM alike. JB even forced a GC into the standard. Comment deleted
time to make a new web with lisp Comment deleted
It's gonna be 100s of times faster than plain ol js Comment deleted
And pretty sure that Kotlin will dominate it Comment deleted
Ofc, kotlin can use jvm optimisations Comment deleted
And transpule JVM libs to AsmJs Comment deleted
Oh god Comment deleted
Natively. That's why they needed GC into AJ Comment deleted
I think I'm misunderstanding Comment deleted
Basically Kotlin will erase border of back and front once webAsm will support GC it will transpule JVM based code into WebAsm bytecode Comment deleted
lmao i remembered an article then dude disliked c++ because it doesn't have GC Comment deleted
btw https://medium.com/better-programming/modern-languages-suck-ad21cbc8a57c Comment deleted
No kotlin Comment deleted
Kotlin would get solid 4 stars or 4/half. It's has pros of Sacala and some of its big cons are actually a big pros of the Kotlin. In other words Kotlin is Scala do e right except it Lacs of intersection types and is still highly developing Lang. But cool thing in rules JVM, start to shine on JS ecosystem and penetrating native intensely. Once native support will reach prod it will be the question why do you want BDSM yourself with C++ while Kotlin/native is here? Comment deleted
why would i bdsm myself with jvm when there is GNU/Guile scheme? Comment deleted
K/JVM and K/JS ecos are done, native is on the way. Don’t like JVM/JS ecos wait for native. Oh… Yet another fan of lispian parantesis. Can I take it to the web-front? Can I haz actors? Reuse code in broswer and mobile devices? Can interact with existing JVM backends? I can do with Kotlin. Comment deleted
there is clojure btw, a lisp on jvm Comment deleted
and for web there is clojurescript Comment deleted
Yeah but its dynamic so no fun with type inferance but gradual typing is a good pain killer. Comment deleted
yea, that's why I mostly code in c Comment deleted
Elaborate Comment deleted
I'm still nostalgic to Presto based Opera. Sigh... Comment deleted
JB can compile into Wasm but cannot yet bring the code from JVM land Comment deleted
I was fighting against GC but now in on the other side. Come to the dark side Comment deleted
welcome to messy frametime zone Comment deleted
only lag inside your application Comment deleted
There's nice quote about GC in C++, kek lol in that article Comment deleted
I’m a backendist that ocasinoally need to iteract with all of the intersaecting worlds. Having Kotlin at least foe back and android allows me share at least data classes and some business logic. React Kotlin wrappers is a bliss! iOS adopting Kotlin so having same lang across various ecos with ability to share code kinda outshadow alternatives (that in anyway I do not see any clear benifits even to consider) like what for in example? Comment deleted
i'm not telling that kotlin is bad. kotlin is cool for it's purposes Comment deleted