Found a 11-minute voice note embedded as a Java comment in production
Description
Screenshot of a Java source file inside an IDE: after a try-catch block, two slashes begin a comment, but instead of normal text the comment shows an inline audio-message widget - blue play icon, waveform, “0:10 / 11:34”. Below, normal Java continues: “private void readMessages() throws IOException {” followed by an infinite while-loop reading from inputStream.readUTF(). The absurd visual implies a developer literally pasted a messenger voice note into the code to explain logic, illustrating catastrophic documentation practices and future code-review nightmares. Seasoned engineers will instantly associate this with unmaintainable legacy comments and the perils of mixing UI artifacts with source control
Comments
60Comment deleted
Imagine the diff: +11MB binary blob, −0 lines of actual documentation
That audio waveform perfectly captures what the CPU sounds like when this while(true) loop hits production - a continuous scream lasting exactly 11 minutes and 34 seconds before someone notices the service is at 100% CPU and the on-call engineer gets paged at 3 AM
When your exception handling strategy is literally just 'printStackTrace()' and a 10-second voice memo explaining why the production server is on fire - because nothing says 'enterprise-grade error recovery' quite like dumping stack traces to stdout and hoping someone's tailing the logs. Bonus points for the infinite while(true) loop reading messages until 'END' - because who needs graceful shutdowns when you can just throw IOException all the way up the call stack?
If your PR ships an 11:34 voice memo between // comments, the while(true) reader and e.printStackTrace() aren’t the only anti‑patterns - your documentation just forked into a podcast
If your PR needs an 11:34 voice memo and still ships while(true) with e.printStackTrace(), you’ve implemented Docs-as-a-Podcast and Alerting-by-Playback
printStackTrace in prod: Because EOFExceptions deserve a verbose obituary before the JVM joins the void
excuse me? Comment deleted
I think you need to upvote this issue! Comment deleted
*cough* *cough* *sssshshshshhs* YEAH TODO REMOVE HUHA *cough* *cough* Comment deleted
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-332604 THIS IS REAL OMFG Comment deleted
Wow Comment deleted
Wtf😐🤣 Comment deleted
this one is better Comment deleted
whoever made this, burn in a hell!👿🔥🔥🔥 Comment deleted
It is just an idea for now Comment deleted
i won't use IDEA from now on then Comment deleted
Like we have many alternatives Comment deleted
vim I have Comment deleted
Why are you offering a text editor for an IDE? Comment deleted
I speak from my experience --- and I used vim as an IDE Comment deleted
“Using something to write code” doesn’t make it an IDE Comment deleted
But LSP does. Look up neovim Comment deleted
He just likes the 90s. Comment deleted
Vim IMHO is a great product. But it is not an IDE. Comment deleted
I prefer nano or mcedit. Comment deleted
you can easily turn it into one tho Comment deleted
*she Comment deleted
Everyone knows women are a concept invented by corporations to sell more pronouns. Comment deleted
what the imaginary fuck Comment deleted
that's a common misunderstanding. It's actually men that were invented by fox news to sell more ragebait Comment deleted
sorry but you got it the wrong way humanity is invented to pay for turning resources into waste Comment deleted
ah but that's actually a different conspiracy by big alien-recycle Comment deleted
the whole creation is invented to simulate all of the possible ways that the real humans can be fucked up Comment deleted
no it's just to entertain them Comment deleted
Lmfao Comment deleted
Actually it's quite good Like what if you suddenly got a idea brainstorm... Recoding a voice is faster than typing Comment deleted
People need not to write comments, but read it. And you can't listen to recording faster Comment deleted
I mean in best case the voice comment is local only, who want to share voice files in source But the good thing about it is we can record the voice when we have something nice in our minds then type it later, or even better, use voice to text... Comment deleted
Telegram: 1. Enable voice messages. 2. Add speech-to-text recognition and make it a premium feature. 3. PROFIT! IntelliJ IDEA: 1. Enable voice messages. ⟨=== You are here. Comment deleted
Google, which deployed a free service with real time voice recognition buncha years ago: 🥲👍 Comment deleted
And Полина the chad coming in clutch to actually deliver the cursed implementation Comment deleted
I hope she is joking Comment deleted
https://github.com/polina4096/voices I can't check it, but it's here Comment deleted
When TempleOS does this (full blown sprites inside code), no one bats an eye Comment deleted
It should've come with a graphic installer and pro vs. community edition, so people would've thought it's a big deal Comment deleted
i think TempleOS batted many eyes Comment deleted
More accurate Comment deleted
how the hell? Comment deleted
Introducing: do-if block. Comment deleted
"Female conditional" or "German branching". 🤪 P.S. This is how speculative execution actually works. Comment deleted
What name was channel before? Comment deleted
Dev Memes Comment deleted
How is it different from current name? Comment deleted
it's just one (1) meme now Comment deleted
It looks the same for me Comment deleted
Looks good to me. 👌 Comment deleted
Actual code: .... val path = ".idea/${name}.wav" ... editor.document.insertString(startOffset, "// voice:${path}") Comment deleted
not entirely true but this thing scares me even more. I don't know shit about kotlin, it might be a feature as far as I know Comment deleted
It should be funny but... https://habr.com/ru/news/762758/ Comment deleted
it is really funny Comment deleted