OpenAI Defies Geometry, Unfollows the Vertical Axis
Why is this AI ML meme funny?
Level 1: No Up, Only Sideways
Imagine you have a toy car that normally can drive forward/backward and left/right. Now picture telling your friends: “My car decided it will not go up or down anymore, only sideways!” 😄 That sounds pretty silly, right? Cars don’t normally go up or down anyway (they can jump maybe?), but just saying it out loud is funny because “up and down” is a direction, not a thing you can stop being friends with.
This meme is joking in that same way. It’s pretending that OpenAI (a famous maker of smart computers) announced it won’t “follow” the vertical axis anymore. The vertical axis is basically the up-and-down line you see on a chart or graph. Saying you won’t follow the up-and-down line is like saying “I refuse to go upwards or downwards.” It’s a goofy, impossible idea.
Why is it funny? It’s like hearing someone say, “I unfollowed gravity” or “I quit using the color blue.” You normally follow people (like on social media to see what they post), not directions or lines. So it sounds absurd. It makes us imagine an AI or robot that one day just ignores anything going up or down – maybe it only moves horizontally and never climbs stairs because it “doesn’t follow the vertical direction.” That image is so ridiculous that it makes people who understand both social media and simple graphs laugh.
In simple terms, the joke is mixing two different things and making a nonsense statement. It’s funny because it’s as if a very smart computer is doing something very dumb and literal – saying “I don’t care about up and down anymore!” Just like a cartoon character who suddenly walks only left-right and bumps into walls because they refuse to go up or down, the idea of an AI not “following” the up-down axis is lighthearted and silly.
Level 2: Not Following Directions
Let’s break this down in simpler terms. The image is a screenshot of a tweet (a post on Twitter). It’s written to look like an alert about a big tech company. The Twitter account Big Tech Alert (with that all-seeing eye logo) usually posts when a major tech company or CEO follows or unfollows someone on Twitter. For example, it might alert people if “Elon Musk just followed Mark Zuckerberg” or “Google’s CEO unfollowed the NASA account.” These tweets read like news flashes for tech watchers. They often start with a 🚫 red prohibited sign emoji for an unfollow or a ✅ check mark for a new follow, then say “X is no longer following Y” (for an unfollow) or “X is now following Y” (for a follow). It’s a little bit of tech gossip delivered in a very direct way.
Now, this particular tweet says: “@OpenAI is no longer following the vertical axis.” Here’s why that’s funny:
OpenAI as the subject: OpenAI is a real organization (the AI research company famous for making ChatGPT). They do have a Twitter account, so they could follow or unfollow other Twitter accounts. But in this tweet, OpenAI isn’t unfollowing a person or another company… it’s “unfollowing the vertical axis.” Huh? That immediately sounds odd, because the “vertical axis” isn’t a person or an account at all. It’s a math term!
What is the vertical axis? Think of a simple graph you might draw on graph paper. It has a horizontal line (the x-axis, running left-right) and a vertical line (the y-axis, running up-down). The vertical axis is basically the up-and-down direction line on a chart. We use it to measure values going upward. For instance, if you plot a curve of something, the vertical axis might show quantity or score, while the horizontal axis shows time or another variable. So the vertical axis is not something you can follow on Twitter; it’s one of the two main directions on a graph.
“No longer following” as a pun: On social media, following someone means subscribing to their posts. You can start following (becoming a follower) or if you “unfollow,” you stop being a follower. Here the tweet uses the phrase “no longer following” in a normal way grammatically, but the object is weird: “the vertical axis.” It’s a joke because you can’t literally follow an axis direction on Twitter. It’s as if someone said, “I unfriended the color blue” or “I’m not following gravity anymore.” It mixes a Communication term (following/unfollowing on a social network) with a pure mathematical term (vertical axis).
The idea of losing Y-axis alignment: There’s an extra layer if you’re into math or coding. Saying OpenAI isn’t following the vertical axis could be interpreted as “OpenAI isn’t aligned with the vertical axis.” In plain terms, that sounds like something is not lined up correctly. In graphing, being aligned to the vertical axis could mean you’re oriented normally, but if you’re not following it, maybe you’ve gone “off-axis.” This makes people think of charts or outputs that are skewed or an AI model that’s somehow ignoring one direction. It’s a playful nod to things like when a chart’s alignment is messed up or when an AI’s behavior isn’t properly aligned with expectations.
AI alignment inside joke: In the world of AI_ML, there’s a well-known phrase “AI alignment” which is about making sure AI systems do what humans intend (it’s a big topic in AI safety). OpenAI works a lot on that problem. But here, the meme cheekily uses alignment in a literal sense – aligning with an axis on a graph. So it’s joking that OpenAI has an “alignment problem” not with ethics or goals, but with basic geometry (the poor AI isn’t aligned to the y-axis!). It’s a pun that folks in the AI community find amusing because it twists a serious term into a silly visual joke.
In simpler words, the tweet is funny to developers and math-inclined folks because it’s as if a serious AI company (OpenAI) did something nonsensical on social media – “unfollowed” a direction on a graph. It combines the language of online DevCommunities (Twitter follow notifications) with nerdy math talk (vertical axis alignment). If you’re in on both those worlds, you instantly recognize how out-of-place it is, and that mismatch makes it DeveloperHumor.
Anyone who has drawn graphs or dealt with charts knows you always have an x-axis and y-axis. They help you read values. So imagining “not following the y-axis” is like saying “I won’t use the up-down scale anymore.” It’s absurd, like a joke error message. And on the Twitter side, we’ve all seen those automated tweets about who unfollowed whom, often stirring gossip. Here it’s just InsideJokes meta-humor: no real drama, just a mathematical concept getting “unfriended.”
Level 3: Axis Unaligned
At first glance, this screenshot looks like a typical Twitter news alert. It’s from the novelty account Big Tech Alert, which normally tweets about who follows or unfollows whom among tech giants. But then you read it closely and get hit with the geeky punchline:
🚫 @OpenAI is no longer following the vertical axis
This has layers of humor that mathematically minded engineers can’t help but chuckle at. Let’s unpack why this single sentence works so well:
Twitter lingo meets math: On Twitter, saying someone “is no longer following” another is a mundane social media update. Here, the object of unfollowing is “the vertical axis.” That’s not a person or company at all, but a mathematical concept – the y-axis on a graph (the line that goes up and down). By treating the vertical axis like a user account, the meme creates a absurd scenario. It’s as if OpenAI’s Twitter account clicked “Unfollow” on something you’d normally find on graph paper. This twist on a follow/unfollow notification is classic TwitterHumor for developers: mixing a real social-media action with a totally non-social object.
Big Tech Alert’s usual vs. this joke: Normally, @BigTechAlert posts real updates like “Google CEO is now following OpenAI” or “Meta is no longer following Apple”. These are semi-serious tidbits that might hint at industry gossip or DevCommunities drama. In this meme, the format is the same, but the content is pure AIHumor. To see the contrast:
Aspect Normal Big Tech Alert (real life) This Meme’s Twist (punny world) Unfollow target A real account – e.g. a CEO or a rival company’s official handle. A concept – the vertical axis, not an actual user at all. Actual meaning The company or exec literally unfollowed someone on Twitter. OpenAI’s AI figuratively ignored the y-axis (the up-down direction on a graph). Tone/Context Factual or snarky tech news (who unfriended whom in Big Tech). Tongue-in-cheek nerd humor mixing social media and math. The table makes it clear: the meme turns a normal follow/unfollow notification into a surreal statement. It’s funny precisely because OpenAI “unfollowing the vertical axis” can’t happen in reality – it’s a mashup of Twitter culture and Cartesian coordinates.
The AI/ML inside joke – “alignment” gone wrong: There’s a delicious double meaning that AI folks will appreciate. In machine learning, OpenAI is famously concerned with “AI alignment,” usually meaning aligning an AI’s goals with human values (so the AI doesn’t go off the rails). But here, “alignment” is hijacked to mean literally aligning with the y-axis on a graph. The tweet implies a bizarre scenario where an AI from OpenAI has a new kind of alignment_problem_humor: it’s no longer aligned to the vertical dimension! For a moment you picture a model that has decided to operate in a flattened world with one less axis. It’s an alignment problem of a very different sort – not moral or ethical alignment, but geometric alignment. This wordplay is gold for those who follow AI safety discussions. It pokes fun at the serious notion of “AI alignment” by imagining an AI that simply says, “Nope, I’m done with the y-axis.”
Gradient descent off track: The meme even tickles the brain of anyone who knows a bit of optimization or calculus. In training neural networks, algorithms like gradient descent rely on following the slope of the error surface in all dimensions to minimize a loss function. Now imagine a model that literally “stops paying attention to the y-dimension.” 😄 That conjures a hilarious mental image of an optimizer that refuses to move up or down on a 2D error landscape – it would just slide side-to-side, never reaching a true minimum because it’s ignoring any vertical change. In technical terms, if the gradient’s vertical component gets ignored, the poor AI is stuck wandering horizontally. It’s as if the training process flipped a flag to
follow_y_axis = false. This is the gradient_descent_off_track reference: the AI’s training process has gone awry in a cartoonishly literal way. Of course, in reality, an AI can’t just drop a dimension unless something is very wrong with the model or the data (e.g. a constant gradient of zero along that axis). But picturing such a failure mode is comically absurd. It’s like a self-driving car that suddenly says, “I’ll steer left and right, but I refuse to handle hills.”
In summary, the meme succeeds because it blends communication styles: a deadpan Twitter announcement with a math/AI in-joke. It taps into our insider knowledge:
- We know OpenAI as a leading AI lab (the folks behind ChatGPT), so they’re often at the center of serious AI discussions.
- We know a vertical axis is just the y-axis on a graph – essential for plotting anything from model accuracy to stock prices.
- We know the phrase “not following X” on social media usually has nothing to do with math.
By smashing these contexts together, the tweet inspires a double-take. Engineers chuckle because it momentarily reads like OpenAI committed some faux pas (“no longer following…”) but then you realize it’s just math having a laugh. It’s a nerdy InsideJokes cocktail: one part Twitter culture, one part high school algebra, with a twist of AI metaphor. And given how DevCommunities love to poke fun at AI buzzwords, framing an “alignment problem” as literally not aligning with an axis is the perfect geeky pun. This is a meme you’d tag your data scientist friend in, saying “Looks like the AI went off the charts – literally!” 🎉
Description
A screenshot of a tweet from the verified account 'Big Tech Alert' (@BigTechAlert), which has an Eye of Providence as its profile picture. The tweet, set against a black background, makes the surreal and humorous statement: '🚫 @OpenAI is no longer following the vertical axis'. Below the text, the engagement metrics of 9 comments, 12 retweets, 81 likes, and 5.1K views are visible. The humor originates from the absurdity of an automated tracking bot, which typically reports on companies following or unfollowing real accounts, generating a nonsensical alert about unfollowing an abstract mathematical concept. For a tech-savvy audience, this is a prime example of automation gone awry, highlighting how literal-minded scripts can produce bizarre, Dadaist outputs when encountering unexpected data, turning a simple social media tracker into an accidental source of high-concept shitposting
Comments
13Comment deleted
This is what happens when your social graph database has a schema validation error and accidentally creates an edge between 'OpenAI' and 'EuclideanSpace.Y_AXIS'. The unfollow API call worked, the logic did not
Looks like their loss function hit NaN after dividing by dY - now the model’s literally ignoring the whole coordinate
After years of vertical scaling debates and watching OpenAI's valuation climb the y-axis exponentially, they've finally discovered horizontal scaling - though their infrastructure team insists they meant 'following a different coordinate system in their AGI alignment space.'
This perfectly captures the tech industry's obsession with 'pivoting' and abandoning established paradigms. Next week's announcement: 'We're deprecating the concept of time itself and moving to a quantum-only release schedule.' The joke works on multiple levels - it's absurdist (you can't abandon a mathematical axis), yet it mirrors real corporate announcements where companies dramatically pivot from foundational principles they previously championed. It's the software equivalent of announcing you're no longer supporting gravity in your physics engine because it doesn't align with your new vision
OpenAI 'unfollowed' the y-axis - must've switched to log‑polar metrics; execs still want up‑and‑to‑the‑right, so SREs are adding a rotation matrix to Grafana
OpenAI unfollowed the vertical axis - finally a reproducible alignment failure: disable the y-axis and every KPI is magically up-and-to-the-right
OpenAI's embeddings hit zero cosine similarity with hype accounts - optimal pruning
Too much buzz for a parrot with a huge dictionary and a power plant in the ass. Comment deleted
Nah they're going quantum now. Things overlap so they look offset, but it's all ok Comment deleted
So the AI can be even more fuzzy now? Comment deleted
Of course! Comment deleted
What will hapen if you give a coding agent access to an ibm quantum api? Comment deleted
Everything that can happen and cannot happen at the same time. Schrödinger's computers Comment deleted