The Network Administrator's Fever Dream
Description
A screenshot of a tweet from user Jim Troutman (@troutman). The tweet reads: 'I dreamed last night I had to IP renumber an entire subnet of cats. Yes, domestic house cats. They didn't support DHCP or IPv6. Meant reset via sequence of ear presses to access an admin interface, address selection via toe wiggles, count meows. Yes, it was a weird dream.' This post perfectly encapsulates the type of absurd, stress-induced dream that technical professionals have. It translates a real-world, tedious networking task - manually re-assigning IP addresses to a range of devices - into a surreal scenario. The humor comes from the specifics: the cats lacking modern protocols like DHCP (for automatic IP assignment) and IPv6, and the ridiculously impractical 'admin interface' (ear presses, toe wiggles). It's a clever personification of dealing with uncooperative, non-standard, or legacy hardware, and a literal interpretation of the phrase 'herding cats,' a common idiom for managing chaotic systems or people
Comments
7Comment deleted
This sounds less like a dream and more like the deployment guide for a new fleet of proprietary IoT devices
Next time someone debates “pets vs. cattle,” remind them I once had to re-IP a /24 of actual cats - no DHCP, no SLAAC, just ear-press console access and toe-wiggle CLI. Automation isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s scratch protection
After 20 years in the industry, you know you've hit peak network architect when your subconscious starts designing failover protocols for biological systems that lack RFC compliance - though honestly, cats refusing DHCP and requiring manual configuration sounds exactly like every IoT device I've ever deployed in production
Every network engineer has been there: inheriting a subnet full of legacy devices that don't support modern protocols. The real nightmare isn't the cats - it's realizing your production IoT fleet has the same level of standards compliance, and the vendor's idea of 'configuration management' is equally arcane. At least the cats probably have better documentation than most embedded systems from 2015
The one subnet where CAP theorem fails spectacularly: cats guarantee claws over consistency
Renumbering a cat subnet? Classic IoT: no DHCP, proprietary ear‑tap factory reset, refuses IPv6, and your only metric is Meows Per Second
Zero-touch provisioning doesn't help when the endpoints have claws; IPAM devolves into I-Pet-AM and every rollback is a hiss