Elon Musk's X vs. The EU's Digital Services Act
Description
A screenshot of a post from the social media platform X, detailing a public dispute between Elon Musk and the European Commission. In the primary post, Elon Musk claims that the European Commission offered X an 'illegal secret deal' to quietly censor speech to avoid fines, a deal he alleges other platforms accepted but X refused. This post is a direct response to a quoted post from Margrethe Vestager, an EU official, which states that X is not in compliance with the Digital Services Act (DSA) regarding transparency, ad repositories, and data access for researchers. The image captures a significant moment in the ongoing global debate about tech regulation, platform governance, and content moderation, pitting a major tech platform's free-speech-absolutist stance against a powerful regulatory body's new legal framework. It is highly relevant to tech professionals as it illustrates the real-world legal and ethical challenges of operating global platforms
Comments
54Comment deleted
The EU's 'preliminary findings' are just the result of X failing the CI/CD pipeline for the 'Digital Services Act' compliance check. Elon's claiming the test itself is a backdoor
Somewhere in the monorepo, a freshly merged ‘silence_user(…)’ function just tripped the new EU-DSA linter - apparently /* TODO: don’t tell anyone */ isn’t an acceptable privacy notice
Ah yes, the classic 'git blame --everyone-else' defense strategy - where your production incident response is just tweeting that competitors accepted the same bug as a feature while you heroically refused to merge the compliance PR
When your platform's compliance strategy is 'move fast and break regulatory frameworks' but the EU's GDPR team has entered the chat with a preliminary findings document. Classic case of optimistic locking meets distributed consensus failure - except the transaction can't be rolled back and the fine is measured in percentage points of global revenue
EU's DSA preliminary findings on X: like a linter flagging your repo for missing transparency commits, but X refuses the auto-fix squash
DSA requirement: “provide a research API”; enterprise response: “we did - behind OAuth, a CAPTCHA, 10 req/day, and a Kafka topic named compliance_opt_out.”
Nothing says platform transparency like a write-only audit log and an API gateway rule that returns 200 to ad buyers, 451 to researchers, and a press release to regulators
Elon said this, thus must be true Comment deleted
Guy which delete viewing someone likes, bcs someone spotted him liking cuck porn can't lie, right? Comment deleted
Where you live? Comment deleted
North Dakota uwu Comment deleted
Well this sounds like the EU to me... and I am European Comment deleted
didn't know Japan embassy provides living space Comment deleted
✨Delusional✨ Comment deleted
𝒻𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓀𝓎💅 Comment deleted
"Elon is bad because Elon is bad" so him saying the EU is a maffia must be a lie and not important Comment deleted
I've never said that. Comment deleted
I sense high level of sarcasm here Comment deleted
EU is mafia, so no surprise Comment deleted
The CCP here wants to tell that the EU isn't a mafia, so don't worry Comment deleted
Ah if the CCP says it I think I can believe Comment deleted
You better Comment deleted
Shitstorm about to start, or not Comment deleted
i hope it will Comment deleted
I am taking that with a lot of salt for it coming from Elon... Comment deleted
Otherwise I am aware of the EU having a lot of room for improvement when it comes to ICT https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/ Comment deleted
also, don't forget that Elon is guy which love sucking himself more than breathing Comment deleted
one sec. Comment deleted
https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-prioritizes-musk-vip-data-self-driving-2024-7 Comment deleted
Didn't expect him to be that big Comment deleted
It doesn't change the fact that EU is doing something terribly wrong Comment deleted
that just means, that both on them are shit-talkers, and it's very likely that Elon just lying (but i can say thank you to EU for 1 thing, and that for making apple use USB-C) Comment deleted
EU my beloved Comment deleted
I really doubt Elon is lying here. As much as I think he's not the best human possible, the EU has been doing a LOT of evil things lately. Also, making Apple use USB-C is indiferent as it changes absolutely nothing Comment deleted
You're not getting Schengen any time soon Comment deleted
Elon is the free speech absolutist until it makes him feel bad Comment deleted
Yeah. Agree Comment deleted
Gold quote, im gonna save this one Comment deleted
Except it makes apple use the standard EVERYONE ELSE uses instead of basically cable DRM Comment deleted
It will not, tho. They'll find a way to screw you. And if people don't like it, they should not buy it. Simple as that Comment deleted
Except they won't because apple has also made it so if you don't have an iPhone but your friends do it fucks you over Comment deleted
So? Don't buy an iPhone You don't agree with the idea, you don't buy the product Comment deleted
iPhones aren't essential and aren't even the best phones Comment deleted
Ah yes, the apple fanboy take Comment deleted
Nah. I hate Apple and I don't buy ANY of their products after I lost a Apple pencil because I forgot to fucking charge it for 2 months Vote with your wallets Comment deleted
As does practically any other coubtry in the whole world Comment deleted
Yeah. Sadly. Doesn't excuse anything tho Comment deleted
Its just a matter of ability, anyone would do it, if were able to Comment deleted
Free speech, sure. Comment deleted
Musk is a clown Comment deleted
Or was I wrong? Comment deleted
🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐 Comment deleted
https://www.allsides.com/story/free-speech-trouble-eu-elon-musk-s-x Comment deleted
Though is was unblocked quickly after 🙂 Comment deleted