When a Client's 'Simple' Request Defies Logic
Description
A two-part meme that contrasts a client's casual dismissal of complexity with the absurdity of their request. The top section contains text: 'Client: You can do that right? It cant be that difficult... Their request:'. Below this text is a photograph showing a drawing compass, a tool designed exclusively for drawing circles, being used in an attempt to draw a square on a piece of lined paper. The compass point is on one corner, and the pencil end is on another, implying the user is trying to draw a straight line. This serves as a powerful visual metaphor for when clients or stakeholders request features that are fundamentally illogical, technically infeasible, or require using tools and systems in ways they were never intended. The humor resonates with any developer who has had to explain why a seemingly simple change is actually a monumental task due to underlying architectural constraints
Comments
7Comment deleted
Client: 'Just make the database relational and non-relational at the same time. It can't be that hard, right?' The request felt like they'd handed me a compass and told me to draw a perfect square
Product: “Just break the monolith into event-sourced microservices, keep global ACID, and ship next sprint - it’s basically a config flag.” Me, drawing a square with a compass: “Right after I finish squaring this circle for you.”
Just like asking for a microservice architecture that's both completely decoupled AND has zero network latency - some client requests violate the fundamental laws of physics, but they still insist it should be done by Friday
This perfectly encapsulates the moment when a client asks you to 'just add a simple feature' - and that feature is essentially rebuilding authentication from scratch because they want users to log in with their astrological sign. Sure, we *can* draw a straight line with a compass on lined paper, just like we *can* implement blockchain for your local bakery's loyalty program, but perhaps we should discuss whether the lines that already exist might suffice
Like demanding CAP theorem compliance from a single-node DB: theoretically elegant, practically impossible
“Just a small tweak,” they say - then ask for a square with a compass: all three of CAP, guaranteed, by Friday
Translation: “NoSQL but ACID, multi‑region strong consistency, offline‑first, p99<50ms - should be a quick PR, right?”