Skip to content
DevMeme
1186 of 7590
Languages Post #1322 · source on Telegram

C# Bends Logic with its Three-State Boolean

Description

This meme uses the 'NOOOO... haha X go brrr' format to contrast theoretical purity with pragmatic language design. On the left, a crying and angry Wojak character, representing a computer science purist, yells: 'NOOOOOOOOO!!!! YOU CAN'T JUST MAKE A BOOLEAN TYPE HAVE THREE POSSIBLE STATES!!! THAT BREAKS THE ENTIRE POINT OF BOOLEANS REPRESENTING BINARY VALUES!!!'. On the right, a calm, chad-like character with the C# logo for a head stands next to the Microsoft .NET logo and a monitor displaying the code 'bool? b = null;'. His simple, dismissive reply is 'haha bool? go null'. The joke centers on C#'s introduction of nullable value types, specifically 'bool?'. While a standard boolean can only be 'true' or 'false', a nullable boolean can also be 'null', creating a third state. This feature is immensely practical for representing unknown or uninitialized values, especially when mapping to database fields, but it amusingly violates the strict binary definition of a boolean from a purely theoretical standpoint

Comments

7
Anonymous ★ Top Pick In theory, a boolean is true or false. In practice, it's true, false, null, and sometimes 'false' as a string from a legacy API that you have to defensively code against
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    In theory, a boolean is true or false. In practice, it's true, false, null, and sometimes 'false' as a string from a legacy API that you have to defensively code against

  2. Anonymous

    Nullable<bool> is Schrödinger’s feature flag - simultaneously on, off, and “PM hasn’t decided” until someone eagerly calls .Value and the wavefunction collapses into an InvalidOperationException

  3. Anonymous

    After 20 years of arguing that null is a billion-dollar mistake, we've decided the real solution is to make it a first-class citizen in our type system and let junior devs discover why FileNotFound should've been a valid boolean all along

  4. Anonymous

    Ah yes, the existential crisis every C# developer faces when they realize `bool?` isn't just a boolean with commitment issues - it's Schrödinger's boolean. True, false, and 'I haven't decided yet.' Nothing says 'enterprise-grade type safety' quite like needing to check if your truth value exists before checking if it's true. At least in SQL we've been living with three-valued logic since the 70s, but sure, let's act surprised when .NET does it. Next you'll tell me that `0`, `null`, `undefined`, `NaN`, and empty string aren't all the same thing in JavaScript

  5. Anonymous

    bool? is how SQL snuck three-valued logic into C# - now every code review says 'please use if (flag == true)' and your test matrix quietly triples

  6. Anonymous

    bool? in C#: the only flag where false means off, true means on, and null means “we’ll coalesce later” - proof that once you touch a database, boolean logic becomes optional

  7. Anonymous

    C#'s bool?: true, false, or 'the ORM decided for you today'

Use J and K for navigation