Skip to content
DevMeme
6133 of 7435
AI Opinions: The Power User vs. The Principled Opponent
AI ML Post #6726, on May 1, 2025 in TG

AI Opinions: The Power User vs. The Principled Opponent

Why is this AI ML meme funny?

Level 1: Secret Fans in Disguise

Imagine two kids on a playground loudly insisting, “Eww, we hate candy,” to look cool in front of others. They high-five each other for agreeing that candy is the worst. But then you peek into their lunchboxes and — surprise! — they’re packed with chocolate bars, lollipops, and gummy bears. 😄 This meme is just like that. The two friends are saying they hate ChatGPT (a super-popular talking robot helper) to fit in with the crowd that’s against it. But all around them, they have goodies and stickers from lots of other robots and AI helpers. It’s as if they’re secretly big fans of the very thing they claim to hate. The funny part is seeing them pretend to dislike something while being completely surrounded by it – they’re basically caught with candy wrappers in their pockets right after saying they don’t eat sweets. In simple terms, the joke is about people not being honest about what they like: they trash-talk the cool new thing in public, but behind the scenes they can’t get enough of it.

Level 2: Generative Guilt and Glossary

Let’s break down what’s happening for those newer to the AI hype train (or derailment). The meme uses a scene of two people chatting in a record store. In the movie this came from, they bond over a shared music interest; here it’s been remixed to bonding over hating ChatGPT. ChatGPT is a famous AI chatbot created by OpenAI – it’s basically a program you can talk to that generates human-like text. By 2025, it became super popular for answering questions, helping with code, writing content, you name it. But anything super popular in tech often gets a backlash. Some developers might say “I can’t stand ChatGPT” because: maybe it sometimes gives wrong answers confidently (yes, it “hallucinates”), or they worry using it is cheating, or they’re tired of the hype claiming AI will replace programmers. In the meme, both characters say “I hate ChatGPT” to each other. That’s them finding common ground by rejecting something trendy – a bit like two junior programmers agreeing “Ugh, I hate JavaScript frameworks” because they’ve heard seniors rant about them. It’s a performative stance – meaning they’re perhaps saying it to fit in or look cool to each other.

Now look at the second panel: suddenly we see they’re actually surrounded by AI tools and slogans! Those icons around them are logos of various generative AI products:

  • The orange sunburst is Anthropic, a company that makes Claude, another AI chatbot similar to ChatGPT (Anthropic focuses on AI safety and ethics).
  • The blue four-point star represents Google’s Bard (and its upcoming more powerful model Gemini). Bard is Google’s AI chat assistant – Google’s answer to ChatGPT.
  • The little pixelated “M” likely stands for Midjourney, a popular AI image generator (people use it to create art from text prompts). It could be another AI project, but Midjourney fits especially with the art theme here.
  • The black square with a white leaf is Cohere’s logo. Cohere is another AI company providing large language model services for developers (like generating text via API).

So these two who claim to hate AI chatbots are literally decked out in AI swag from multiple companies. “Swag” means fun free merchandise like stickers, badges, T-shirts you get at tech events or in support of a product. It suggests they not only use those AI tools, they’re proud enough to slap the stickers on their stuff! This contrast is the joke: their words say “I don’t like AI,” but their surroundings scream “I LOVE AI!”.

Also take note of the other stickers with phrases:

  • “USING AI = LOSER BEHAVIOR” – This is a mocking slogan implying that anyone who uses AI for content or art is a loser (not a “real” developer or artist). It’s the kind of exaggerated insult you might see in heated online debates. The sticker showing it as a colorful word cloud is ironically loud. If someone actually wears that sticker, they’re making a bold anti-AI statement.
  • “THEFT ISN’T ART” – This refers to a common argument by artists against AI-generated art. Many artists feel that AI image models (like Midjourney or Stable Diffusion) were trained on artwork taken from the internet without permission, effectively stealing artistic style or content. So they say the resulting AI art is theft, not true art.
  • “ARTISTS AGAINST AI ART” – This is likely a badge representing a group or movement of artists who oppose the use of AI in art. It’s a real sentiment out there: communities of artists have rallied to say they don’t want AI to replace or infringe on human art.

So, in simpler terms, these two characters are outwardly siding with the AI critics. They have slogans and badges that an anti-AI person would have, especially an artist worried about AI ethics. A junior developer or art student might see seniors or peers brandishing these kinds of statements or sharing them on social media. It’s presented here as stickers to visually show how heavily they’re broadcasting “I am against AI.”

Now, why is that funny or notable? Because everything else around them – all the product logos – show they are also using AI all over the place. It’s like if a friend loudly says “I hate smartphones” but has an iPhone, an Android tablet, and a smartwatch all on them. The meme highlights a form of hypocrisy or internal conflict common in the current tech scene: people feel pressure to criticize AI (maybe to be on the “ethical” side or not seem blindly hype-driven), yet they can’t resist using the very tools they criticize because those tools are genuinely useful or cool. A developer new in the field might be confused, thinking, “Should I hate these AI assistants? Everyone on Twitter is dunking on ChatGPT,” but at the same time noticing that folks are quietly using AI assistants to speed up writing code or documentation.

The setting itself – a record store scene – is a popular meme format (taken from a movie). In the original movie scene, two people bond over liking the same indie band. Memes often remix it to bonding over any niche opinion. Here it’s flipped: bonding over a negative opinion (“I hate this thing”) because sometimes disliking something popular makes you feel part of the cool rebel crowd. The twist is the second panel exposing they’re not rebels at all; they’re surrounded by the thing they claim to hate. For newer folks: this is poking fun at a real trend in 2024–2025 where a lot of devs and content creators would publicly criticize ChatGPT and generative AI (calling it overhyped, unethical, or “not real art/code”) while at the same time everyone is experimenting with it, using GitHub Copilot (an AI coding assistant), asking ChatGPT for help, or using AI art in their projects. In short, AI is everywhere, and even the haters often have their hands on it. That ironic truth is what the meme is capturing. Once you know the logos and slogans, the meme basically screams: “We say we hate AI, but who are we kidding? We’re totally into AI.”

Level 3: Hype Cycle Hypocrisy

At first glance, this meme is calling out a classic tech culture irony: loudly hating on a hyped tool while secretly indulging in it. In the top panel, two people bond over “I hate ChatGPT” – a sentiment some developers and artists proclaim publicly these days. ChatGPT, an AI assistant built on a large language model (LLM), became incredibly popular, perhaps too popular, leading to a backlash. Seasoned devs have seen hype cycles before: a new technology rockets to fame (from Web3 to Generative AI), and inevitably a contrarian crowd forms. Here our meme characters are posing as part of that contrarian club, performatively agreeing that ChatGPT is awful.

The punchline comes in the identical second panel when the scene is suddenly flooded with AI swag and stickers. Logos of other AI tools – the orange burst of Anthropic (makers of the Claude assistant), a blue star for Google’s Bard/Gemini, a pixelated “M” (think an icon for Midjourney or another model), and Cohere’s white-leaf-on-black logo – surround them. There’s even a loud pastel sticker repeating “USING AI = LOSER BEHAVIOR,” plus “THEFT ISN’T ART” and “Artists Against AI Art” badges. It’s a hilarious visual metaphor: these two claim to despise ChatGPT, yet they’re literally immersed in AI tools and even anti-AI merch. It screams hypocrisy – akin to a developer ranting “I hate cloud computing” while wearing an AWS hoodie and deploying to AWS every day.

The humor hits home for many in the industry because it’s so relatable. We’ve all seen engineers or online influencers farm clout by ripping on the latest tech (be it ChatGPT, Kubernetes, you name it) and then catch them using it “off the record.” In 2023–2025, AI assistants are everywhere – coding helpers in IDEs, writing aids, image generators – so much that even the haters often rely on them quietly. The meme specifically nods to the ongoing AI ethics debate: those anti-AI art stickers mirror real-world artist protests that generative image models “steal” artists’ work. Some artists and devs publicly join the Artists Against AI chorus (“theft isn’t art!”) to take an ethical stand, yet here our meme suggests they’re still surrounded by (and benefiting from) AI tech. It’s a playful jab at how people might denounce ChatGPT as a matter of principle or trendiness, but then happily use some other AI model under a different name. The presence of all the big AI logos indicates the two characters haven’t exactly divorced themselves from generative AI – quite the opposite. They’ve got one foot in the protest, and one foot firmly in the AI hype.

For a senior engineer or anyone who’s been through tech hype waves, the meme also pokes fun at bandwagon behavior. The record-store setting (a nod to a famous scene from “500 Days of Summer”) usually signifies bonding over niche music tastes; here it’s bonding over ChatGPT criticism to seem “in-the-know.” But the joke’s on them because their environment betrays that they’re total AI enthusiasts. It’s the AI hype vs. reality gap: outwardly cynical, inwardly can't get enough. This resonates with devs who recall colleagues trash-talking a new language or tool in meetings, then googling how to use it after work. The meme’s message? In tech, actions speak louder than words (and stickers). No matter how much someone talks down the latest AI, chances are their stackoverflow history, Slack channels, or yes, sticker collection, tells a different story. The industry-wide inside joke is that using these tools is almost irresistible – even the loudest critics often have an AI assistant in their toolkit (or at least on their laptop). It’s hype hypocrisy at its finest, and we’re all in on the joke.

Description

A two-panel meme using a scene from the movie '500 Days of Summer' where two characters, a man and a woman, are in a record store. In the top panel, the man says, 'i hate chatgpt,' and the woman replies, 'me too,' as they share a look of mutual understanding. In the bottom panel, the dialogue is replaced by logos and stickers indicating their true, conflicting reasons. Over the man are logos for AI-related tools and platforms: Zapier (automation), Perplexity AI (conversational AI), Hugging Face (AI community), and Poe by Quora (AI chatbot aggregator). Over the woman are various stickers with anti-AI art sentiments, such as 'THEFT, ISN'T ART,' 'ARTISTS AGAINST AI ART,' and 'USING A.I. IS LOSER BEHAVIOR.' The meme's humor comes from the dramatic irony of their agreement. The man, an AI power-user, dislikes ChatGPT likely because he prefers more specialized or advanced AI tools. The woman, representing the creative community's backlash, dislikes it on ethical grounds, viewing generative AI as harmful to artists. It perfectly captures a major schism in the tech and creative communities, where surface-level opinions on a specific tool can mask deeply divided underlying philosophies

Comments

54
Anonymous ★ Top Pick He hates ChatGPT because its context window is too small; she hates it because its training data was too large
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    He hates ChatGPT because its context window is too small; she hates it because its training data was too large

  2. Anonymous

    Sprint ritual: complain that “AI will never replace real engineers,” then merge the PR Copilot wrote, auto-document it with ChatGPT, and let Claude summarize the retro - artisan software, handcrafted by three different LLMs

  3. Anonymous

    Even diffusion models with their stolen training data and artists wielding copyright claims can unite in their disdain for ChatGPT - turns out the real hallucination was thinking any of us would escape the prompt engineering industrial complex unscathed

  4. Anonymous

    The classic developer move: publicly denouncing ChatGPT while your terminal history shows 47 Claude API calls, your design folder is full of Midjourney outputs, and your commit messages are suspiciously well-formatted. It's not hypocrisy - it's having 'nuanced opinions' about which probabilistic text generator deserves your token budget this sprint

  5. Anonymous

    Two nodes with different state machines both commit value 'hate_chatgpt' - congrats, you achieved Byzantine consensus via branding

  6. Anonymous

    “I hate ChatGPT” is an overloaded function - architects mean “Claude/Mistral + RAG + Perplexity to dodge hallucinations and vendor lock‑in”; artists mean “stop training on my art.”

  7. Anonymous

    ChatGPT hate unites us like a monolith migration plan - until Claude's context window whispers sweet CAP theorem compliance

  8. @LastStranger 1y

    I really understand artists, that hate AI. It's really situation from Detroit: become human, where androids kicked out humans from factories, because they work better. You learnt how to draw for 10-40 years, you finally good at that and can live without worries, the biggest might be deadline. And all, that you learn for years now is needless. You can start think in 2 ways, your whole life is needless and AI is bullshit

    1. @backendotnet_124 1y

      Or you can adopt AI to your needs and use it as a tool (as it is)... increase your output and keep working with higher, lets say, KPI)

      1. @LastStranger 1y

        In the drawing main problem that you can't add AI directly, like in programming, because you will be only bridge from buyer to AI. I think most of artists use AI for references, but it don't helps in drawing

      2. @Algoinde 1y

        If you draw to make money, you will integrate AI and just carry on If you've been drawing as an artistic expression and to connect with others, you will still continue to draw because someone else churning out slop doesn't make your work less valuable

        1. @Algoinde 1y

          But it doesn't have to be from an artist standpoint. There's been enough corporate slop art, and now I'm forced to see even more slop, but not even human-made

          1. @mrYakov 1y

            Cleanup your information sources

            1. @Algoinde 1y

              The only time i run into it is when googling something go images, 70% is slop now depending on the query the feeling is simiar to having to watch your step on the streets (or just don't go out) because there's dog poop everywhere

            2. @Dark_Embrace 1y

              You can't run from reality, Neo

          2. @Dark_Embrace 1y

            😁

            1. @Algoinde 1y

              nice anti-buy markers

      3. @sysoevyarik 1y

        "Only goal matters" mindset 🤡

        1. @backendotnet_124 1y

          Can't see any relation/coincidence with my message 😅

          1. @sysoevyarik 1y

            >adopt ai to your needs The more you replace your work with tools, the less "your" work became. If you see nothing wrong here, it's because for you matters what you trying to achieve, and not how.

            1. @tumut 1y

              then the last time any programmer's work actually was theirs was when they had to manually flip switches on the computers to run it

              1. @RiedleroD 1y

                someone made the switches. it's collaboration all the way down. the difference with AI is that it's trying to think for you

                1. @tumut 1y

                  And someone made the AI. I don't think that's the real issue. It's not even that AI tries to "think" for us. We let contact lists do the "remembering" for us all the time. Even GPS usage is having a detrimental effect on our brains. The real problem is slop, which happens whenever you make a technology widely available to the masses. The whole issue people have with AI boils down to elitism, and I don't mind being an elitist but most won't admit it

                  1. @RiedleroD 1y

                    people are rapidly losing the ability to think critically because they've been conditioned to believe what the big AI man says. I'm fine with usage of tools, but turning your brain of and letting the internet man take over goes too far. neither GPS nor a contact list try to think for us. some websites do, but 1. I don't like that either and 2. we have already seen the terrible effects of letting "the algorithm" pick what we're reading and watching. This is not only true for tiktok, but for youtube and all the others as well. Twitter shoves you down the alt right pipeline? years squandered. youtube too? possibly a lifetime of hate and misery. until we as a society understand that technology that tries to take away the thinking from people is bad, we're going to have to deal with those consequences

                    1. @tumut 1y

                      This is hardly a new thing, and you're not as immune to it as you may think. Socrates made pretty much the same criticism about writing, by the way (and in fact I agree with him). "Their trust in writing, produced by external characters which are no part of themselves, will discourage the use of their own memory within them. You have invented an elixir not of memory, but of reminding; and you offer your pupils the appearance of wisdom, not true wisdom, for they will read many things without instruction and will therefore seem to know many things, when they are for the most part ignorant and hard to get along with, since they are not wise, but only appear wise."

                      1. @RiedleroD 1y

                        the thing with writing and memory is that you just need to asess where the writing came from and how believeable it is - same as with your actual memory, in fact. the difference with AI is that it takes away the user's choice - unless of course the user uses it critically. But the amount of people blindly trusting it as infallible is fucking terrible, and the fact that companies do everything in their power to lean into that should be a crime.

                        1. @tumut 1y

                          Much the same thing with AI and writing. You can blindly trust either or verify either. It has never been easier to feed people mass propaganda ever since literacy became widespread

                          1. @RiedleroD 1y

                            because of laws and norms. AI is currently completely lawless and that's why it's so harmful. I'm sure laws will spring up eventually, but until then, AI is harmful and I want nothing to do with it. …not to mention all the theft of intellectual property, but that's a different topic for a different time…

                            1. @tumut 1y

                              I can't wait to see what our oligarchs will draft to regulate us, I mean, AI 😀

                              1. @RiedleroD 1y

                                idk what country you live in, but I'm confident that where I live will regulate AI well enough

                                1. @deadgnom32 1y

                                  I'm curious where people still have oligarchs besides of Russia.

                                  1. @RiedleroD 1y

                                    usa

                                    1. @deadgnom32 1y

                                      ah. yes. I think it's funny, that eu invests 500M€ into recruiting US scientists while US spends gigalions on training AI scientists, which cost them 30K$/month, while being paid for their usage 20K$/month, while a human scientist costs like 1/8 of it.

                                      1. @RiedleroD 1y

                                        …not sure what your point is

                                        1. @deadgnom32 1y

                                          they played high on AI neglecting human resources, we went a slow steady path. now they are flooded with ai generated problems with extremely high costs. attack the unis. while we get more efficient human brains and through regulations we are being kept safe from rogue ai startups.

  9. @mrYakov 1y

    Professional artist still outmatch ai. But for them ai can save a lot of time on routine tasks, so i dont see problem there.

    1. @backendotnet_124 1y

      Exactly what I said above) thanks)

  10. @ZgGPuo8dZef58K6hxxGVj3Z2 1y

    Obviously because he hates it and doesn’t use it. The icons are there to show what other AI services he uses

  11. @H3R3T1C 1y

    well, in art... the artists, all of them, theft in somehow, because the inspiration is based on their experience on live....

  12. @karanokyoukai 1y

    https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/hayao-miyazaki-on-ai-utterly-disgusted/

    1. @kitbot256 1y

      Makes sense. The only option is enabling "do not show me AI-generated crap" wherever it is available; and avoid using sites where this setting is not possible or marking is not enforced, because every search result is filled with garbage.

    2. @sysoevyarik 1y

      He was talking about one particular use of ai, not about whole situation

  13. @SheepGod 1y

    Same

  14. @backendotnet_124 1y

    Hammer did not replace builders... The same thing here... AI could generate possible solutions but the final desicion still on engineer That was my point... not just achieve the result but make this result maintainable and stable using AI as support

    1. @TheFloofyFloof 1y

      Well right now AI isn't a solution to anything meaningful. The entire LLM market isn't useful yet

    2. @sysoevyarik 1y

      Ah yes Hammers that can build house on their own without any inspection by human. I can write more detailed: if some tool makes something to achieve 10 times easier, it makes result 10 times less valuable, but at the same time it gives you possibility to make stuff that 10 times more complex in the same time. People who write in (for example) in Python not "less programmers" than c programmers because they write in easier language. They solve harder tasks on higher level of abstraction. But situation for vibe-"coding" and ai-"art" is different. Instead of making something 10 times better you just spend 10 times less time actually doing work (or generate 10 times more slop)

  15. @backendotnet_124 1y

    Disagree... AI could help generate ideas and write templates for simple solutions My service has fully designed UI by AI... all related logic regarding state management, api calls, security and so on - fully on me but design part - AI support. Design != architecture... and AI helps me a lot to avoid spending money for design freelancers for example... my service is not so popular yet to pay for outsource 😅

    1. @TheFloofyFloof 1y

      So you don't own the copyright for your UI design? What about icons and logos?

      1. @backendotnet_124 1y

        As I know, ShadCN components could be used for commercial usage... the same as lucide react for Icons)

    2. @SheepGod 1y

      out of curiosity what do ya use for that? could use some sketches made to use as basis

      1. @backendotnet_124 1y

        Claude, Gemini 2.5, free tier of ChatGPT Never tried design smth by existing scetches, but I know some models (usually Chinese) can do it

  16. @patsany_horosh_mne_v_dm_pisat 1y

    honestly tho, I'm kinda scared

  17. @backendotnet_124 1y

    I did not see the tool yet that can build whole "house" (enterprise product) without human inspection

    1. @deandon 1y

      human inspection is more of a "validation" that you need to pass, not bypass

Use J and K for navigation