Databases
Post #1724 · source on Telegram
When someone proposes database design in sixth normal form
Description
Four - panel, black-and-white line-drawing meme. Panel 1 (top-left): a stick-figure person bends toward a small dog saying, “Aw look how cute.” Panel 2 (top-right): a close-up of the dog’s head with narrowed eyes; above it reads, “Let’s use 6th normal form.” Panel 3 (bottom-left): the person stands upright, palms to cheeks, exclaiming, “Oh no.” Panel 4 (bottom-right): the person repeats the pose and text bubble reads, “It’s r******” (ableist slur, partially censored here). The joke targets extreme over-normalization in relational schema design - going far beyond the usual 3rd normal form - implying that suggesting 6NF is excessive and counter-productive
More like this
More like this in Databases →
Use J and K for navigation
Comments
6Comment deleted
Suggesting 6NF is like pitching a microservice for every column - sure, the schema’s pure, but now every SELECT is a distributed systems post-mortem waiting to happen
The only thing more normalized than a 6NF database is the developer's social life after implementing it - completely decomposed into atomic, non-interacting units that require complex joins to produce any meaningful relationships
Ah yes, 6th normal form - because nothing says 'I understand databases' quite like decomposing your schema into so many tables that a simple SELECT requires more JOINs than your team has patience for code reviews. It's the database equivalent of microservices taken to their logical extreme: theoretically pure, practically unusable, and guaranteed to make your DBA question your architectural decisions during the 3 AM incident call when that 47-table join times out
6NF: Where every fact lives in its own table, and your SELECT turns into a 50-way JOIN party
6NF: microservices for columns - cute on the whiteboard, brutal in prod; now every SELECT is a 24-way JOIN and EXPLAIN reads like a postmortem
Propose 6NF for an OLTP schema and the optimizer opens a Jira: “Recompose reality via JOINs.”