Skip to content
DevMeme
6431 of 7590
CodeQuality Post #7052 · source on Telegram

Devil Promises Readable Variable Names - Child Writes ASCII Art in Code

Description

A two-panel meme. Left panel: A red devil/demon holding a crystal ball with the text 'My child will write readable and meaningful names.' Right panel: A dark code editor showing ASCII art made entirely of hash/block characters forming a devil's face, with the keyword 'let' at line 3 and a single line of code at the bottom reading '() = {0} // unit -> unit'. The contrast between the devil's aspiration for clean code and the reality of code where variable names are replaced by incomprehensible symbols and ASCII art illustrates the eternal gap between coding aspirations and reality. The right side demonstrates an extreme case of code obfuscation using identifiers that form an image rather than conveying meaning

Comments

22
Anonymous ★ Top Pick Satan's parenting goals vs reality: 'My child will use descriptive variable names.' The child: *makes the variable declaration spell out a pentagram in the IDE minimap*
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    Satan's parenting goals vs reality: 'My child will use descriptive variable names.' The child: *makes the variable declaration spell out a pentagram in the IDE minimap*

  2. Anonymous

    Sure, it breaks every style guide, but on the upside, you'll never have a merge conflict on this line

  3. Anonymous

    Some kids draw on the fridge; this one commits it between ‘let’ and the type annotation - good luck grepping THAT during the next refactor

  4. Anonymous

    After 20 years of enforcing clean code standards and conducting countless code reviews about meaningful variable names, you discover your team's latest PR where they've named their critical authentication service '👹' because 'it's Unicode-compliant and self-documenting' - and technically, they're not wrong

  5. Anonymous

    Ah yes, the eternal optimism of 'meaningful variable names' - right before your build pipeline runs Terser with mangle:true and your beautiful 'userAuthenticationService' becomes '𝓊' in production. At least the demon is honest about what actually ships to prod: a Lovecraftian horror of Unicode that makes you question whether you're debugging code or summoning an elder god. The real kicker? That unit -> unit type signature at the bottom suggests this abomination still type-checks perfectly fine

  6. Anonymous

    It type-checks as unit => unit; the real side effect is turning grep, blame, and diff into an ASCII summoning ritual

  7. Anonymous

    The type checker infers unit => unit; reviewers infer entropy => infinity

  8. Anonymous

    Satan vows readable vars - until webpack minifies the family legacy into single-letter purgatory without source maps

  9. @Algoinde 1y

    thanks

    1. @ownedbywuigi 1y

      Relatable

  10. @ownedbywuigi 1y

    Fuck Safari

    1. @hyena_stuff 1y

      Nah, if I'm fucking a browser it's gunna be Firefox 🥵

      1. @ownedbywuigi 1y

        Gotta be r3dfox for me

        1. @yeselamsew_b 1y

          Do you mean this one

          1. @ownedbywuigi 1y

            The browser

  11. @afdanilkin 1y

    Which language is that?

    1. @deandon 1y

      english

      1. @afdanilkin 1y

        In the right half I mean

        1. @yeselamsew_b 1y

          JavaScript

    2. @t_zitadelle 1y

      F#

  12. @yeselamsew_b 1y

    Probably

  13. @yeselamsew_b 1y

    Come on I have used windows 7 until like month ago before i swith to linux but i never heard of r3dfox

Use J and K for navigation