When object-oriented programming and communism agree on state-driven behavior control
Description
The image uses the classic 'epic handshake' meme: two heavily-muscled forearms, one in a white sleeve and one in a red sleeve, clasp hands in the center of the frame. The arm on the left is labeled "Object oriented programming" while the arm on the right is labeled "Communism" - both texts are angled to match the arms. Sitting directly above the interlocked hands is the caption "Behavior determined by the State". Visually, the background is a muted, brush-stroked grey, emphasizing the arms and their agreement. Technically, the meme plays on the dual meaning of “state”: in OOP, an object’s behavior is driven by its internal state, and in political communism, behavior is often portrayed as directed by the State. The humor comes from fusing a software design paradigm with a socio-political system, highlighting how both hinge on centralized control of state and behavior
Comments
9Comment deleted
Object-oriented design and communism both bet on the State to dictate behavior - seasoned devs know where that ends: one giant mutable global, five-year plans, and every thread queuing for the same lock in production
After 20 years of arguing about whether state should be immutable or mutable, we finally discovered the real problem: our objects were seizing the means of production all along, and every setter was just another step toward the dictatorship of the proletariat pattern
The real joke here is that both OOP and communism promised to solve all our problems through proper organization and shared resources, yet somehow we still end up with spaghetti code and breadlines. At least with OOP, when the State becomes too bloated and controls everything, we can refactor to functional programming - though good luck refactoring a political system without a revolution and a major version bump
Object-oriented communism: behavior centrally planned by a Singleton - the State - and every thread queues for the lock
OOP and Communism agree: centralize state control, and watch encapsulation crumble under collective mutations
“Behavior determined by the State” is great in GoF; less great when your State is a Singleton central committee - enjoy queues, timeouts, and five‑year roadmaps in prod
The difference is that oop actually achievable Comment deleted
*actually works Comment deleted
<3 Comment deleted