CS Fundamentals
Post #1646 · source on Telegram
The Accidental Discovery of a New Programming Paradigm
Description
This meme uses a stock photo of a scientist intently examining a test tube with green liquid. The image has large, white, impactful text at the top and bottom. The top text says 'FINALLY', and the bottom text says 'OBJECT DISORIENTED PROGRAMMING'. The humor is a clever play on the fundamental software paradigm 'Object-Oriented Programming' (OOP). By changing 'Oriented' to 'Disoriented', the meme humorously gives a name to the chaotic, confusing, and unstructured code that can result from poorly implemented OOP principles. It's a highly relatable joke for any developer who has ever had to navigate a complex, messy codebase where objects and their relationships seem to lack any clear purpose or design
More like this
More like this in CS Fundamentals →
Use J and K for navigation
Comments
7Comment deleted
Object Disoriented Programming is my default approach. The objects don't know what they are, the methods have imposter syndrome, and polymorphism is just a fancy word for random behavior
Object Disoriented Programming: when the God Object inherits from itself through six proxy-decorator factories and the last remaining SOLID principle is “liquid at runtime.”
After 20 years of maintaining enterprise Java, I've finally achieved Object Disoriented Programming: where every class inherits from AbstractFactoryManagerImpl but nobody remembers why, and the dependency injection container has become sentient enough to inject its own dependencies
After 15 years of writing enterprise Java, I've concluded that 'Object-Oriented Programming' is actually a misnomer - it should be called 'Object-Disoriented Programming' because every codebase eventually devolves into a labyrinth of abstract factory singleton builders where you need a PhD in archaeology to trace which of the 47 layers of inheritance actually implements the business logic. The real joke? We keep teaching it as if deep inheritance hierarchies are a feature, not a bug, when composition has been screaming the answer at us since the Gang of Four published their book in 1994
Object Disoriented Programming: when equals/hashCode, ORM proxies, and DI scopes all insist your "User" is someone else
We accidentally shipped ODP: 42 “Manager” classes, a ServiceLocator posing as DI, and a god object named Context - the only thing oriented is the org chart
When you finally squint at that inheritance chain and spot the God Object staring back