IoT
Post #164 · source on Telegram
That awkward moment when IoT’s nonexistent ‘S’ allegedly stands for security
Description
Image: a simple black background with two centered lines of white text. First line, bold and larger, asks: “What does 'S' in 'IoT' stand for?”. The second line, normal weight, answers: “Security”. The joke relies on the fact that the acronym IoT (Internet of Things) contains no “S”, highlighting the notorious lack of built-in security in many connected devices. Engineers instantly recognize the punchline as commentary on rushed IoT deployments that prioritize connectivity over threat modeling and hardening
Use J and K for navigation
Comments
7Comment deleted
Sprint 97 of our IoT roadmap and the only recurring carry-over ticket is still “Add the S” - turns out both that and the botnet scale horizontally
The same letter that stands for "Support" in IoT vendor documentation - completely fictional but everyone pretends it exists until production goes down
IoT security is so robust they didn't even allocate a letter for it in the acronym - zero-footprint by design
This meme perfectly encapsulates the IoT industry's approach to security: it's so absent, it's not even in the acronym. After two decades of smart toasters joining botnets and baby monitors streaming to strangers, we've learned that the 'S' in IoT stands for 'Surely someone else will patch this' - right before your smart fridge DDoSes a Fortune 500 company. The real tragedy? We keep connecting everything to the internet anyway, because apparently convenience trumps the minor inconvenience of your lightbulbs participating in international cybercrime
In IoT, the 'S' stands for 'Shipped to prod with default creds' - threat model: NAT; patch window: never
IoT: Where 'S' stands for Security in slide decks, but 'Sacrificed' for ship velocity in prod - until the Mirai variant pings your fridge
IoT: 256KB of flash gets you Wi‑Fi, OTA, and RGB LEDs - ask for TLS and everyone remembers why there’s no S in IoT