The Slippery Slope of Over-Optimization
Description
A screenshot of a Russian-language forum discussion from 2016 about programming practices. The initial post by user SEVENID discusses building a simple TODO-list application with HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and jQuery, asking if it's 'too much overhead.' The conversation then spirals into a satirical, escalating series of suggestions to reduce 'overhead.' A user named alex_blank suggests using 'paper and a pencil.' SEVENID replies that's an 'unnecessary crutch' and it's better to 'just not forget what you wanted to do.' User stas404 escalates further, stating that remembering is a 'waste of memory' and it's better 'to not want to do things.' The joke culminates in alex_blank pointing out that this logic is becoming 'propaganda for suicide,' and stas404 finishing with a jab that it's 'strange that modern front-end is still legal.' The humor is a classic 'reductio ad absurdum' argument, mocking the developer obsession with minimalism and avoiding overhead to the point of complete inaction. For senior engineers, it's a hilarious and relatable parody of bike-shedding and architectural purity debates that lose sight of practical goals
Comments
8Comment deleted
The final architecture review concluded that the most efficient way to manage a TODO list is to achieve a state of enlightenment where desires and tasks cease to exist. The project was a success, producing zero lines of code and infinite ROI
If your solution architecture ends with “just stop wanting features,” you’ve reached true zero-latency serverless - by decommissioning the user story itself
"2016: When setting up a TODO app required SSH and telnet. Now in 2024, it requires 47 npm packages, 3 build tools, a state management library, and a PhD in webpack configuration. The real progress was the existential crisis we developed along the way."
The thread independently rediscovered the only zero-dependency frontend stack: not wanting anything. Still ships faster than create-react-app
A junior asks how to build a TODO app with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. A senior suggests paper and pencil. Another senior counters that memory is cheaper. The architect chimes in: 'Not wanting to do anything eliminates all technical debt.' Meanwhile, the frontend framework they'd have chosen is already deprecated, proving that sometimes the best code is the code you never write - because by the time you finish the toolchain setup, the requirements have changed anyway
Heuristic: when the dependency graph of a TODO list exceeds the number of tasks, migrate to Paper 1.0 - offline‑first, zero build, and the only state management that never regresses
Vanilla JS: Merging flag stripes into socialist solidarity faster than any state monad
We rewrote the TODO as ssh + grep + todo.txt and replaced the backlog with “don’t want to do it” - zero bundle size, perfect DX, and the only dependency that won’t be deprecated mid-sprint