Developers react to claimed room-temperature superconductor replication in Chinese labs
Description
The image is a screenshot of a tweet by Christian Keil (@pronounced_kyle) stating: “The two Chinese labs working on replicating LK-99 appear to have found a room-temperature superconductor.” The tweet continues, “At first blush, here's what's different from last time:” followed by three bullet points: (1) “it's more like "room temperature" than room temperature, the paper says 250K which is -10 F or -23 C. That's still HUGE IF TRUE, because we can get things that cold with liquid nitrogen” (2) “we have actually discovered a superconductor at this temperature before, but it was at high pressure. This paper says it's potentially superconductive AT AMBIENT, NORMAL PRESSURE” (3) “it has *already* replicated, with two separate labs in China confirming the results. Last time the big question was "will it replicate." And the answer this time seems to be "it already has."” Below the tweet is a split-panel showing an arXiv entry titled “lead apatite,” authors “Hongyang Wang, Yao Yao, Ke Shi, Yijing Zhao, Hao Wu, Zhixing Wu, Zhihui Geng, Shufeng Ye, Ning Chen,” blue buttons “Download PDF” and “HTML (experimental),” and abstract text describing diamagnetic magnetization, Meissner effect below 250 K, plus metadata “Comments: 7 pages, 4 figures; Subjects: Superconductivity (cond-mat.supr-con); Cite as: arXiv:2401.0099 [cond-mat.supr-con].” The right side shows a photo of a small dark pellet resting on a metallic disk, hinting at levitation tests. For engineers, the post exemplifies the tech-hype cycle around disruptive hardware breakthroughs - ambient-pressure, near-room-temperature superconductivity that could revolutionize power delivery and hardware design
Comments
42Comment deleted
Physics just got LK-99 to replicate in two distant labs at - 23 °C under ambient pressure - so they’ve basically cracked distributed strong consistency, while our microservices still need ritualistic liquid-nitrogen deployments to pass CI
After decades of managing distributed systems that only achieve eventual consistency at best, physicists claim they've found a material with perfect conductivity at room temperature - meanwhile we're still debugging race conditions in our 'perfectly synchronized' microservices running at 0 Kelvin data centers
Ah yes, the classic 'room temperature superconductor' - where 'room temperature' is defined as -23°C, presumably in a room located in Antarctica. Two labs confirming replication is great, but in the world of extraordinary materials claims, we've learned that 'replicated' often means 'we also got confusing results that might be measurement artifacts.' It's the scientific equivalent of 'works on my machine' - except the machine is a cryogenic chamber and the 'works' part is still under peer review. Wake me when it's levitating at 20°C and powering a grid, not just showing diamagnetic behavior that could be explained by seventeen other phenomena
250K at ambient pressure with two reproductions feels like 'works on my lab'; ping me when the Meissner effect is GA and cuts our AWS bill
Two labs replicated a "room‑temperature" superconductor - where "room" means -23 C; still more reproducible than most vendor microservice benchmarks under "ambient, normal pressure."
Replicated by two labs before the hype cooled: physicists beating Big Tech to true parallel CI/CD
is this a meme that I should laugh or something else? Comment deleted
i sure hope it doesn't age like last time Comment deleted
here's a direct link to the preprint btw arxiv.org/pdf/2401.00999.pdf Comment deleted
and here's more context news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38853706 Comment deleted
I've read a short novel before about a group of scientists which were shown a supposed video proof of antigravity working and asked to replicate it. They doubted everything, but were persuaded by the government officials that the videos were true, and the original apparatus was accidentally destroyed, so they had to work from the ground up. After considerable struggle, denial and like 3 years of work, they finally unveiled a working prototype, only to be told that all of the videos they were shown were actually fake, and that they've made a genuine discovery. Can't remember neither the name or the author though Comment deleted
i do remember the same story! Comment deleted
It's Noise Level by Raymond F. Jones Comment deleted
Yeah its similar to vulnerabilities until somebody looks at it its not existent lel Comment deleted
What if it's supercoductive only when nobody is looking at it? 🤔 I have –23 °C outside right now, but by any mean do not volunteer to check it or anything else. Comment deleted
I agree to not look at my PC if the superconductor inside makes it work 10 times faster. Same for anything.. just cover it with a shell, let it be shy as much as it likes. -25C is excellent. Something a regular refrigerator can achieve. Comment deleted
our freezer can barely achieve -15 Comment deleted
Your freezer either has bad insulation or is some bad/cheap or old model. Modern freezers can achieve -24C and advertise it in their specs. Comment deleted
In US a typical freezer for long-term storage of ice-cream has operational temperature around that, they even changed the definition to distinct those from other low temp freezers. Comment deleted
Well.. that's not cool. But, this is irrelevant to the subject: regular freezers can achieve the temperature required for the mentioned superconductor operation. It's a huge leap similar to the discovery of superconductors that could be cooled with nitrogen instead of helium. Comment deleted
Remember that refrigerator needs to be able to work against this Comment deleted
My 1660 Ti Max-Q can do 81 before disconnecting. (Yes its hotplug) Comment deleted
but its faster than 3050 mobile Comment deleted
Is it? Comment deleted
like 20%, yup Comment deleted
They must achieve at least 0 °F / −18 °C for the long-term safety. European residential freezers have a four star rating system: * −6 °C (21 °F), 1 week ** −12 °C (10 °F), 1 month *** −18 °C (0 °F), 3–12 months **** −18 °C (0 °F) to −26 °C (−15 °F) The most common is *** currently, ** was also popular earlier. Comment deleted
nope the whether here is cursed Comment deleted
I'm not sure superconductors would make your computer all that much faster.. I thought a bunch of the everyday use case of superconductors would be lowering power loss in transmission.. Which makes - 25C still a bit toasty for a power grid Comment deleted
So they did manage to replicate this! Huge! Comment deleted
Another fake, like Jan Hendrik Schone's story, such breakthrough requires substantial progress in understanding of quantum mechanics, not just material science or experimental equipment design, since the effect itself is inherently quantum mechanical Comment deleted
idk, at least it's supposedly replicated Comment deleted
Yeah, the key word here is "supposedly"😀 Comment deleted
Lets wait for a secondary government’s confirmation not affiliated with china Comment deleted
Smells of CCP propaganda to me. We'll see. Comment deleted
sus. don't get your horses rattled Comment deleted
Can I run Minecraft on it? Comment deleted
Though it would benefit generators and energy storage a lot too, which would be nice! But it seems slightly odd we're not already looking at energy storage with liquid nitrogen cooled superconductors? Or at least, I've not heard of any attempts to actually do that. But yeah, impacts seem to be big for scientific research, and for some medical tech, and for the power grid, but not so much something that would need to be in every home? Comment deleted
And maybe would help in quantum computation research, but that's certainly not "making your computer 10 times faster", quantum computers are a different ballgame than classical CPUs, very very good at some specific problems, but pretty slow at most general purpose computation. At best, generally available quantum computation would be an auxiliary processor sitting alongside your CPU and GPU and everything else and just doing stuff when you need to crack SHA hashes or whatever, filling a similar niche to a TPU Comment deleted
But general purpose quantum computation is hindered by a lot more than just a room temperature superconductor Comment deleted
mb, idk 250K is still insanely high for superconductors, but maintaining this temperature is a problem, not only in GPU Comment deleted
cooling process by any means requires a lot of energy Comment deleted
of course it can be achieved, but I can only imagine that mining on superconductor barely covers electricity bills Comment deleted