All the languages on your resume versus the ones you truly master
Description
Two-panel photo meme. Top panel: a carved wooden pen holder jam-packed with pens, markers, and a highlighter; white caption text reads “Programming languages on your resume.” Bottom panel: the same holder now nearly empty, containing only a single blue-ink pen; white caption text reads “Languages where you can convert String to int without Google.” The visual joke contrasts the long list of technologies people claim on CVs with the very few languages they can remember basic type-conversion syntax for without searching. It pokes fun at résumé padding, knowledge retention, and how a seemingly trivial task - parsing a string to an integer - exposes the real depth of a developer’s language proficiency
Comments
44Comment deleted
I can quote the CAP theorem backwards, but the second someone asks how to turn "42" into 42 my brain launches a tab war: atoi? strconv.Atoi? Integer.parseInt? - turns out being polyglot just means being fluent in Google
After 20 years in the industry, I've mastered 15 languages' hello world examples, but still can't remember if it's parseInt(), int.Parse(), Integer.valueOf(), or atoi() without checking - yet somehow my resume claims 'expert-level proficiency' in all of them
The brutal truth every senior engineer knows: you can claim fluency in a dozen languages on your resume, but the real test is whether you can write `parseInt()`, `int.Parse()`, `Integer.parseInt()`, or `std::stoi()` without opening a new tab. We've all been that architect in a design review who confidently discusses polyglot microservices architecture, then quietly Googles 'python string to int' when actually implementing the service. The gap between 'I've shipped production code in this' and 'I can write a for-loop without Stack Overflow' is the difference between a pen collection and that one reliable Bic you actually use
Polyglot resumes dazzle with rainbows, but prod code only trusts the black pen that parses strings from muscle memory - no Stack Overflow required
Resume says polyglot; the String→int test says polygoogler. If you can’t recall whether it’s atoi, stoi, Integer.parseInt, strconv.Atoi, or s.parse::<i32>(), you haven’t shipped with that language
My CV lists 12 languages; in prod my L1 cache remembers exactly three conversions - int(s), parseInt, and stoi - everything else page‑faults to Google
😂 Comment deleted
imho that's supposed to be sad, but at the same time its funny Comment deleted
a = "5" a = int(a) Comment deleted
python, which is not even my primary 🥲 Comment deleted
while writing in a less familiar language, I always try putting + before the variable to see if this works out: +a It works only in the damn JS Comment deleted
I always choose Number(a) instead. Readability is more important Comment deleted
😂😂😂😂💀 Comment deleted
In awk there is similar hack with str+0 Comment deleted
"0".parse::<i32>().unwrap() Comment deleted
C++: wtf are u talking about? Comment deleted
C programmers be like: Comment deleted
atoi() Comment deleted
Do you remember its parameters tho? Comment deleted
just char* Comment deleted
Oh, right, it's itoa that was a pain in the ass Comment deleted
And stoi() Comment deleted
returns int Comment deleted
as i remember errors are in errno Comment deleted
you can use sprintf it is easier Comment deleted
Perhaps you meant sscanf? Comment deleted
As int to char* conv? Comment deleted
As char* to int conversion, like stated in the meme. Comment deleted
I prefer atoi but yes sscanf is beter. But some one removed his comment with itoa.. Comment deleted
t = "1" as any as number Duck typing😶🌫 Comment deleted
and this comment was to his replay.. Comment deleted
(-(-“13”)) Comment deleted
I am just kidding dont cancel me Comment deleted
Maan can you send me your avatar? It's so hot and tasty Comment deleted
!!(-(-"1")) @lokot0k, this is the definitive answer to your recent question. https://t.me/dev_meme/5002?comment=70693 Comment deleted
Wow thanks Comment deleted
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. For any bugs and issues contact @dacoconutchemist Comment deleted
*grateful beep beep boop boop* Comment deleted
Seems like its finally working and we dont have to press the red button again Comment deleted
to_string(5) in cpp Comment deleted
other way (str -> int) C++: #include <sstream> int string_to_int(const string &s) { istringstream ss(s); int val; ss >> val; return val; } Comment deleted
wasnt there a stoi func? Comment deleted
idk, probably there is 🤷 Comment deleted
i mean, we can't use google, but we can probably use stackoverflow's own search? Comment deleted