Skip to content
DevMeme
3916 of 7590
VersionControl Post #4262 · source on Telegram

A Developer's Hierarchy of Intimacy

Description

This image is a screenshot of a tweet from user Vy Tran (@tweevtran) on a black background with white text. The tweet reads, 'You're in his DMs, but I'm in his private GitHub repository we are not the same.' Below the main text, the timestamp '4:46 AM · 10 Jan 22 · Twitter for iPhone' is visible, along with engagement metrics showing over 4,600 likes. The profile picture shows a woman with dark hair. The humor is derived from the 'We Are Not The Same' meme format, which asserts superiority by contrasting two different situations. In this context, it humorously reframes the concept of relationship intimacy from a developer's perspective. While being in someone's Direct Messages (DMs) implies a degree of personal connection, being granted access to a private GitHub repository signifies a much deeper level of trust and collaboration. For experienced engineers, sharing a private codebase is an act of significant professional vulnerability and respect, making it a tongue-in-cheek indicator of a more serious 'commitment' than a simple social media chat

Comments

10
Anonymous ★ Top Pick Getting DM access is like a 200 OK. Getting private repo access is like being added to the sudoers file
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    Getting DM access is like a 200 OK. Getting private repo access is like being added to the sudoers file

  2. Anonymous

    Keep flexing about being in his DMs; I’m in his CODEOWNERS file - every merge still needs my blessing

  3. Anonymous

    The real intimacy test in tech isn't sharing your Netflix password - it's adding someone as a collaborator to your private repo where they can see your commented-out console.logs, that TODO from 2019, and the commit messages you wrote at 3 AM that just say 'fixed stuff'

  4. Anonymous

    Repo access is the deeper intimacy: DMs show you what he wants you to read, the commit history shows you who he really is at 3am

  5. Anonymous

    Being granted access to someone's private GitHub repository is the developer equivalent of getting the keys to their apartment - except the commit history reveals way more embarrassing secrets than their browser history ever could. It's not just about trust; it's about being willing to see their 3 AM 'fix typo' commits and that experimental branch they swore they'd delete two years ago

  6. Anonymous

    She's in his DMs, I'm in his .env file - we're galaxies apart

  7. Anonymous

    You’re in his DMs; I’m in his private GitHub with admin RBAC - one of us triggers a typing indicator, the other can trigger a company-wide PagerDuty

  8. Anonymous

    DMs are fleeting; write access to a private repo survives CODEOWNERS, branch protection, and SOC2 - that’s commitment

  9. @azizhakberdiev 4y

    :D:

  10. @dsmagikswsa 4y

    Ofc not the same. He is his boyfriend. You are just a labor to him.

Use J and K for navigation