Skip to content
DevMeme
5653 of 7435
The Vercel/Next.js Mandate: A Developer's Dystopia
Frameworks Post #6203, on Aug 28, 2024 in TG

The Vercel/Next.js Mandate: A Developer's Dystopia

Description

This meme is a screenshot of a tweet from the user 'des' (@dotnetschizo). The tweet features an all-caps, commanding text: 'YOU WILL USE NEXT JS. YOU WILL HOST YOUR APP ON VERCEL. YOU WILL PAY FOR MY S3 WRAPPER. YOU WILL PAY $100K WHEN YOUR TRAFFIC SPIKES. AND YOU WILL BE HAPPY.' Below the text is a Wojak-style cartoon of a man with blonde hair and a mustache, staring intently. The meme satirizes the perceived aggressive marketing and ecosystem lock-in of Vercel and Next.js, portraying it as a dystopian mandate that developers are forced to accept. It critiques the potential for high costs associated with scaling on the platform and the pressure to adopt its specific technologies, framing it as a loss of developer choice

Comments

19
Anonymous ★ Top Pick It's not vendor lock-in, it's 'synergistic vertical integration.' You're not paying for an S3 wrapper, you're investing in a 'declarative data-fetching paradigm.' And that $100k bill? That's just the cost of happiness
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    It's not vendor lock-in, it's 'synergistic vertical integration.' You're not paying for an S3 wrapper, you're investing in a 'declarative data-fetching paradigm.' And that $100k bill? That's just the cost of happiness

  2. Anonymous

    Next.js → Vercel → “enterprise” S3 wrapper → AWS: four network hops so every vendor can bill you for the same byte and Gartner still calls it serverless efficiency

  3. Anonymous

    The real serverless dream: your infrastructure costs scale to zero... right after your bank account does. But hey, at least you saved 10 minutes not configuring nginx!

  4. Anonymous

    Ah yes, the modern web developer's journey: start with 'it's just a simple CRUD app,' end with a $100K Vercel bill because someone posted your side project on Hacker News. But hey, at least your lighthouse score is 100 and your time-to-first-byte is under 50ms - right before your credit card gets declined. The real serverless architecture is when AWS servers your bank account

  5. Anonymous

    Next.js: Seamless deploys today, seamless CFO resignation tomorrow

  6. Anonymous

    Cloud CAP theorem: pick two - cheap, scalable, or not married to someone’s S3 wrapper; the invoice remains strongly consistent

  7. Anonymous

    Our lock‑in mitigation plan is simple: when the egress bill hits six figures, we rate‑limit marketing instead of traffic

  8. @xlsoftware 1y

    wtf, is it theo?

  9. @moosschan 1y

    Hell yeah

  10. @azizhakberdiev 1y

    Zuckerberg is silently watching

  11. dev_meme 1y

    It’s not that bad, yeah (we gonna die together my friend)

  12. dev_meme 1y

    Question out of curiosity. What is the point of using something like vercel, aws or some other similar stuff for small personal projects? Why not just host it on some vps for 5-10$/month? Maybe you will spend more time configuring it, it at end it may potentially save you some thousands of $.

    1. @Jinkros 1y

      About that

    2. dev_meme 1y

      it's the same "let's push the cost to the customer" fallacy as with vidya games being optimized like shit because someone else will pay for the GPU

    3. dev_meme 1y

      Yes Just host it yourself Costs decreased x100+ I say it from own experience with new-world.guide

    4. dev_meme 1y

      For the same reason people use Django for new projects: authority bias, and everyone does that, and because AWS is like Apple, customers like it (why? For the same reason you like your iPhone, it's expensive and dictates you what you can do with it)

  13. @razordude 1y

    It's in the name - Theo.GG

  14. @Jinkros 1y

    https://youtu.be/jFrGhodqC08

  15. @Dark_Embrace 1y

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSA5IDRgSe8

Use J and K for navigation