Skip to content
DevMeme
6229 of 7590
Languages Post #6830 · source on Telegram

JavaScript reinvented as browser-Java: SpongeBob crew can’t break the news

Description

Screenshot of an X (Twitter) post by @HSVsphere reading “How do we tell him,” followed by the familiar SpongeBob still where Mr. Krabs and Squidward stare through a porthole at SpongeBob happily wiping a table inside the Krusty Krab. Beneath the cartoon image is a quoted post from @forloopcodes saying, “Startup idea: java but it works on your browser and html files.” The humor comes from the oblivious ‘startup idea’ that unknowingly describes JavaScript, while the characters’ worried faces capture seasoned engineers’ horror at yet another reinvention of a 1995 technology. For developers, it’s a perfect storm of name-collision history (Java vs. JavaScript), web-dev nostalgia, and classic “not-invented-here” syndrome

Comments

33
Anonymous ★ Top Pick Sure, call the seed round ‘Series 4.0 - because we’ve been shipping this exact polyfill since Netscape Gold.’
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    Sure, call the seed round ‘Series 4.0 - because we’ve been shipping this exact polyfill since Netscape Gold.’

  2. Anonymous

    Somewhere in the afterlife, Brendan Eich is watching someone reinvent JavaScript while James Gosling mutters 'We tried browser Java, it had more security holes than a Swiss cheese firewall and took longer to load than a Maven build with a corrupted .m2 directory.'

  3. Anonymous

    This is the software equivalent of pitching 'email but for computers' to a room full of CTOs. The beautiful irony here is that Java applets were actually a thing in the 90s - complete with security nightmares and the dreaded browser plugin prompts - before being ceremoniously deprecated. Meanwhile, JavaScript literally *is* 'Java but it works in your browser' (naming confusion aside), making this startup pitch a perfect storm of reinventing two wheels simultaneously: one that already crashed and burned, and one that's currently running the entire modern web. It's like proposing to disrupt the transportation industry by inventing 'a horseless carriage' at a Tesla shareholders meeting

  4. Anonymous

    Their 'full-stack Java' MVP: browser JIT hangs longer than a COBOL mainframe outage

  5. Anonymous

    Great pitch - most of us call it JavaScript (née LiveScript); if you really want Java in the browser, ship GWT/TeaVM and tell the board it’s a WASM roadmap

  6. Anonymous

    The ‘startup idea’ is just JavaScript with a new label; the real work is explaining prototypes, a single‑threaded event loop, DOM APIs, and why class in JS is mostly syntactic sugar to every VC

  7. @summitbc 1y

    We tell the creator of the meme that JavaScript is to Java what carpet is to car

    1. @iliakhin 1y

      Pet?

    2. @kirisoraa 1y

      carpet inherits car carpet.honk()

    3. @Art3m_1502 1y

      Then why it is called like this? Of course cock is not related to cockroach but sometimes you have a thought

      1. @summitbc 1y

        Because Java was popular at the time JS was created. Just like when cockroaches were named, cock was very much in fashion

        1. @Art3m_1502 1y

          Never thought i will read something like this

          1. @SamsonovAnton 1y

            Greatest statement ever!

        2. @kirisoraa 1y

          I think cock was popular when JavaScript was created as well... explains a lot tbh

  8. @qtsmolcat 1y

    We already tried Java in the browser

    1. dev_meme 1y

      While applets were cursed ActionScript/Flash was great! Especially for security researchers 🌚

  9. @SamsonovAnton 1y

    Startup idea: Java, but not covered by Sun patents.

    1. @loomingsorrowdescent 1y

      OpenJDK?

      1. @SamsonovAnton 1y

        Microsoft JVM and Visual J++ No, just kidding. Microsoft.NET

        1. Sure Not 1y

          EEE

        2. @callofvoid0 1y

          wtf

  10. @dsmagikswsa 1y

    https://cheerpj.com/cheerpj-3-1-released/

    1. @drznpy 1y

      Was about to post this, lol… we’ve come full-circle

    2. @keeborgue 1y

      Kill it! Kill it with fire!

    3. @keeborgue 1y

      Btw, is there a webassembly version of react native already?

      1. @purplesyringa 1y

        why would it ever be useful

        1. @keeborgue 1y

          The question shouldn’t be “why?” But rather “why not?”

          1. @purplesyringa 1y

            that sort of thing is why we have tons of incompatible frameworks and languages

  11. @Bjastkuliar 1y

    JSP my beloved 😂😂😂

  12. @Sp1cyP3pp3r 1y

    Pizdec

  13. @TheFloofyFloof 1y

    Is that the freddy fazbear

    1. @Sp1cyP3pp3r 1y

      har har har

  14. @ashirbadtele 1y

    wasn't it called applet or something?

Use J and K for navigation