Crying Wojaks React to AI-Made Cancer Vaccine for Dying Dog
Why is this AI ML meme funny?
Level 1: Happy-Sad at the Same Time
There's a news story in the middle: a man's dog was very sick, so he used a smart computer helper to try to make special medicine, and the dog got to feel better and live longer. Around the story are four cartoon faces, and every one of them is smiling and crying at the same time. That's the whole joke — sometimes a story is happy and confusing at once. You're happy because the dog is okay, a little teary because someone loved their dog that much, and a little unsure because the story sounds almost too amazing to be true. It's the face you make when you really, really want something wonderful to be real — and it just might be.
Level 2: Reading the Faces and the Headline
Two artifacts to decode. Wojak ("that feel guy") is the bald, simply-drawn meme face used to express raw, unguarded emotion; the variant here — tears welling up behind a strained smile — means trying to hold it together while feeling too much. Tiling him four times in pop-art colors amplifies it: every version of you, in every mood, reacts the same way. ChatGPT is the conversational AI everyone knows; in headlines like this it usually stands in for "some AI-assisted process the journalist didn't fully unpack." The phrase "scientists astounded" is a classic tell of hype journalism — real research announcements come with hedges, sample sizes, and the words "in mice."
The skill being modeled for newer devs is calibrated reading: when you see "AI creates cancer vaccine," the right response is neither "AI is a scam" nor "AGI has cured cancer," but a set of questions. Was there a wet lab involved? Was it one dog (n=1)? Did the AI design the vaccine or summarize papers about designing vaccines? You'll run the same checklist on vendor benchmarks, framework announcements, and your own manager's enthusiasm after a conference keynote. The tears stay either way — it's still a very good dog.
Level 3: Sentiment Analysis Returns NaN
The composition is a Warhol-grade pop-art grid — red, blue, green, yellow quadrants, each occupied by a color-tinted crying Wojak wearing that devastating forced smile — arranged around a screenshot from The Australian's BUSINESS > TECHNOLOGY section:
Tech boss uses AI and ChatGPT to create cancer vaccine for his dying dog The tale of this heartbroken tech entrepreneur, his tumour-riddled rescue dog and a cure for cancer has leading scientists astounded.
Below the headline: the dog itself, a brindle rescue with a tag-laden collar, looking noble on a paved path. The four smiling-through-tears faces are the entire thesis, because this story puts a developer's emotional stack into an unresolvable merge conflict. One branch: every pattern-matching instinct screams AI hype journalism — "leading scientists astounded" is the same headline grammar that brought us rooms-temperature superconductors and blockchain mangoes, and "uses ChatGPT to create a vaccine" compresses away the part where actual mRNA platforms, actual labs, and actual veterinary oncologists do the falsifiable work. The LLM-as-miracle-cure framing is precisely the genre the tech crowd has spent three years debunking at family dinners.
The other branch: the dog might live. And underneath the snark, the underlying story pattern is real and quietly profound — AI tooling genuinely has collapsed the cost of literature synthesis and personalized-medicine legwork, and a sufficiently motivated tech person with money, time, and a dying dog can now traverse research that used to require an institutional affiliation. Personalized cancer vaccines (tumor sequencing → neoantigen prediction → custom immunotherapy) are a legitimate, peer-reviewed frontier; an ML model shortlisting candidates is a plausible component, even if the headline launders an entire pipeline of human experts into "ChatGPT did it." So the Wojaks cry and smile simultaneously: skepticism and hope are both correct, at the same time, about the same article. That's the meme's actual sophistication — most AI-hype memes pick a side; this one renders the deadlock. It's the emotional equivalent of a test suite where half the assertions pass and the failing half are the ones you care about.
Description
A pop-art style collage with four quadrants in red, blue, green, and yellow, each containing a crying Wojak ('I know that feel' meme face) with a forced smile and tears, rendered in matching color tints. Centered is a screenshot of an article from The Australian under BUSINESS > TECHNOLOGY headlined 'Tech boss uses AI and ChatGPT to create cancer vaccine for his dying dog', with the subheading 'The tale of this heartbroken tech entrepreneur, his tumour-riddled rescue dog and a cure for cancer has leading scientists astounded.' Below the text is a photo of a dark brindle dog wearing a collar with tags, standing on a paved path. The meme juxtaposes genuine emotional reaction with skepticism about sensational AI-can-do-anything journalism, a recurring theme in tech media hype coverage
Comments
101Comment deleted
Twenty years of peer review replaced by a guy prompt-engineering oncology - can't wait for the follow-up where the vaccine hallucinates a citation
I read the same thing on 50 commercials and 50 web advertisements and none of them seemed to do anything Comment deleted
1. there is no such thing as a vaccine for cancer. 2. hey just a thought but what if they used their wealth to help humans instead of some fuckass pet? Comment deleted
There can be, but that is literally drinking poison, targeted poison. As of curing it with vaccine - same as solving aging and mutagenesis (in direction of preservation of a current genome) Comment deleted
chemotherapy is not a vaccine. vaccines are preventive care, chemotherapy is very much active countermeasure to an already existing cancer Comment deleted
How to cure cancer: use lethal poisons that are guaranteed to remove cancer. You'll never die of cancer using this method Comment deleted
ah. my b, didn't understand the joke Comment deleted
There’s nothing about "preventive" Most-covid definition is very vague and fits for many cures too Comment deleted
also! aging is not just degrading genome, but just … things wearing out. there's a lot of things in your body that just don't regenerate and thus gradually stop working as you age. Comment deleted
Just combine DNA with a starfish obviously Comment deleted
Just don't combine your daughter and dog... Comment deleted
currently, no. but potentially, yes. Nothing conceptually stops training immune cells to detect cancer cells and kill it. It just have to be individual things Comment deleted
Has been demoed btw Comment deleted
the problem is that "cancer" is an abstract concept, not a concrete disease. you can't vaccinate against a concept unfortunately. you can make an ad-hoc "vaccine" of sorts that makes your immune system recognize cells of a tumor as a threat, but that requires the cancer to already be there. unless it's contagious cancer with a consistent genome (which does exist in some animals), or a really common one, you can't make a vaccine for it Comment deleted
Or to prevent the causes of cancer. Comment deleted
yes, that one does work. most cancers nowadays are from an unhealthy lifestyle because we've more or less eliminated most other causes Comment deleted
Only the known ones Comment deleted
true Comment deleted
I don't know if that's the major cause. That surely is a factor. To which contaminants (air, food) add up, and that aren't fully preventable because of personal ignorance of how something's been treated, or yet unknown effects. Comment deleted
yea, thats exactly why I mentioned that this has to be individual thing, that developed when you need it. Comment deleted
Cancer isn't a disease you catch, it's a defect your cells get that manifest and spread over time. The trigger to start the spread is usually cellular damage, but the exact cause that leads to the initial defect isn't always known. Comment deleted
HPV HBV EBV KSHV MCPyV HTLV-1 Comment deleted
Viruses can contribute to cancer, but having them does not imply that you have cancer, nor does cancer arise solely from their presence. Infections with viruses can introduce or promote cellular changes, but cancer typically develops only after additional genetic mutations and failures in normal cell regulation accumulate over time. The real issue is specifically detecting, repairing, or eliminating damaged cells and preventing further progression once those changes occur, which we still cannot do reliably in most cases. Comment deleted
Wrong. Comment deleted
because no one would let you inject a human with an ai generated vaccine or whatever that was Comment deleted
a lot of medicine actually already uses "AI" on humans experimentally. not LLMs but other types of AI that actually have, you know, merit Comment deleted
NNs is a superset of AI, or you're talking about An Indian?😁 Comment deleted
…NN is a subset of AI, not a superset Comment deleted
I mean AI isn't a well-defined term anyway, but … you know what the hell I mean Comment deleted
Depending on a definition of intelligence. Any actually learning ones could be extrapolated to a type of NN. Comment deleted
What does it change? Comment deleted
Reminder that during covid, vaccines were being research via computational methods, some even using distributed systems. I still remember some actors publicising a few apps that would allow to use your phone as a distributed calculation system for vaccine research. Comment deleted
Some are, because there are cause by vīrusus, and we can be vaccinated againts it. You as a woman should know that btw 😉 Comment deleted
that's a vaccine against the virus, not the cancer. and what the fuck does me being a woman have to do with anything Comment deleted
Its a vaccine against virus that specifically causes cervical cancer. Comment deleted
…hey guess what a trans woman doesn't have Comment deleted
Hahahahaha, tricked me by your name. Btw men can transfer this virus from a woman to a woman, so they can also be vaccinated Comment deleted
…tricked? My pfp is literally trans colors. I have a queer flag as my status. Comment deleted
Did you really just assumed a know or care about gay flags colors and shit? Comment deleted
if you don't care then don't pretend I tricked you into anything. if you don't pay attention then it's on you. Comment deleted
I could have assumed you're a dude because there are no girls in tech, would you complain more or less then? Comment deleted
maybe you should just stop assuming, hm? Comment deleted
I assume in my code all the time. I can do this all day! Comment deleted
the dog was an indiustry plant Comment deleted
Which cancer, what was the vaccine? Comment deleted
@Grok is this real? Comment deleted
How to get cancer: cure yourself from cancer using poisons killing cancer between other things. Comment deleted
Lol Comment deleted
Don't give furries certain ideas. 😳 Comment deleted
Can you list those certain ideas Comment deleted
E.g. HPV. Comment deleted
is it though? my point was just to use that money for a better purpose, not necessarily chatGPT Comment deleted
Isn't it the same quality? Comment deleted
Not like they shoot them up out of blue inside of people anyways. Comment deleted
(unless it's Operation Warp Speed during Covid, then it's almost allowed) Comment deleted
When AI slop bros and mRNA crap bros ask chatgpt to write a PR article for both of them at once. Comment deleted
Radiation is the most well-known cause, but there are other things too, like incorrectly folded proteins Comment deleted
All definitions except the top one use vaccination in their definition, so they use circular reasoning which is a logical phallacy Comment deleted
which turn them into no-definition making onthy the top one acceptable. Comment deleted
the long lost art of reading the other comments before commenting. bonk me, oh well Comment deleted
Anyway - "ai assisted gene therapy" not a bad idea. But hopefuly not on general-purpose models taught on reddit posts ;) Comment deleted
english only Comment deleted
…the only one that doesn't rely on the definition of "vaccine" is pre-2015, which is preventative. besides, I don't care what some organisation thinks a word should mean. Comment deleted
I don't know enough about that to comment. I have to assume you're right Comment deleted
that's how they get ya! Comment deleted
I'd look it up, but I'm doing transgender stuff rn, so Comment deleted
W Comment deleted
no, L. I hate this Comment deleted
oh, I didn't clarify: I'm getting new documents with my new name and gender on it Comment deleted
oh that sucks Comment deleted
We've seen way too many "cancer vaccine" nothingburgers over last 10+ years. And this shit is literally just chatgpt promo campaign Comment deleted
Widely used at least in Europe for 10 years at least Comment deleted
The only flag I care about lol Comment deleted
…historically SPQR was never used on a flag Comment deleted
I love google Comment deleted
And this too isn't used, yet Comment deleted
what is that. upside down omega? Comment deleted
Well. I support you on your transition. Comment deleted
?? Comment deleted
Women are rarely interested in the best, largest and mightiest legion in the emperium of man! Comment deleted
…oh, warhammer? there's a billion things out there using omega, how the hell am I meant to figure that out… Comment deleted
Google? Comment deleted
it was in the list of possibilities Comment deleted
Thats not google thats stupid ai. Use regular old image search, better results would you get. Comment deleted
it's literally wikipedia, dickhead Comment deleted
You have to search for the flag itself not just the letter, dickhead Comment deleted
how do you think I found the article Comment deleted
and I'm not about to reverse-image search something just because you're too lazy to tell me, ffs Comment deleted
Learn! Comment deleted
reading comprehension Comment deleted
Toilets aren't Custodes, heretic. Comment deleted
…toilets…? Comment deleted
look again at the upside omega with that word in mind 😁 Comment deleted
oh hahaha Comment deleted
Oh yes, Custodes. Specifically made to protect Emperror himself. Great success! Comment deleted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBV1BZJalos Comment deleted
I mean, its better than I expected it Comment deleted
brainstorming and alphafold Comment deleted
tl;dr is this ai washing? Comment deleted
It’s honestly not that clear Comment deleted
That CEO in question also used Alphafold, Grok and other, totally reasonable tools Comment deleted