Skip to content
DevMeme
6480 of 7435
My Dad Works for Canonical and Will Turn You Into a Snap Package
PackageManagement Post #7105, on Sep 7, 2025 in TG

My Dad Works for Canonical and Will Turn You Into a Snap Package

Why is this PackageManagement meme funny?

Level 1: Nerdy Playground Threat

Imagine you’re on a playground and one kid is being mean to another. Instead of the usual “My dad will beat up your dad” comeback, the kid shouts, “My dad will put you in a special box where he controls everything you do!” 😮 Sounds strange, right? That’s basically what’s happening in this meme, but in computer terms. The boy is bragging that his father has a super-nerdy power: to lock someone up in a tech container (a “Snap package”). It’s like saying, “My dad will trap you in a toy box and you can’t get out until he says so!” It’s a silly and over-the-top threat that makes people laugh because it’s so oddly specific and geeky. Even if you don’t know what a Snap package is, you can giggle at the idea of a kid using his dad’s computer job as a magical threat. It’s the mix of serious playground bravado with nonsense tech talk that makes it funny – like a cartoon where someone gets zapped and stuck inside a video game. In simple terms: the kid found the nerdiest way to say “Don’t mess with me!”

Level 2: Package Playground Politics

For those newer to Linux or software distribution, let’s break down the jargon and the joke. The meme shows a kid on a playground, arms folded, yelling “SHUT UP! My dad works for Canonical and can turn you into a snap package!” At first glance, you might be puzzled: What’s Canonical? What’s a snap package? And why is that even a threat? Don’t worry – it’s all about PackageManagement in the world of Linux Operating Systems (and a bit of playground imagination).

Canonical is the company behind Ubuntu, which is one of the most popular Linux distributions (flavors of the Linux operating system). Think of Canonical as the “parent” company that makes decisions for Ubuntu. In the meme, the kid proudly says “My dad works for Canonical” – as if to claim special authority. This mirrors a common playground boast: “My dad/mom works for [big important company] so you better not mess with me!” It’s a childish flexing of muscles, but here the company is a tech one, so the threat is techie too.

Now, “turn you into a snap package” – what on Earth does that mean? In Ubuntu, a Snap package (often just called a “Snap”) is a specific format for packaging software. Traditionally, Ubuntu has used .deb packages managed by the apt tool (Advanced Package Tool). If you’ve ever seen instructions like sudo apt install <program> on Ubuntu, that’s using the old-school Debian package system. Those .deb packages are installed into the system, and programs share libraries (shared pieces of code) that are installed globally.

A Snap, introduced by Canonical in the last decade, is a more self-contained package. It’s like an app-in-a-box. When you install software as a Snap, it comes bundled with most of what it needs to run, including libraries. It’s a bit like getting a portable app that carries its own gear. Snaps are managed by a background service called snapd and usually installed via the snap command or the Ubuntu Software Center. They live in their own world on your disk (typically under /snap or /var/snap), separate from the traditional locations.

Here’s a simple analogy within the tech: with apt/deb, installing software is like installing a package of LEGO that fits into your existing LEGO city – it might rely on some pieces (dependencies) that you already have in your city. With Snap, it’s like giving you a self-contained toy that doesn’t need any of your existing pieces – it comes with its own tiny playset. That self-sufficiency is convenient (no more “Oh no, I’m missing that one piece!”), but it means you might end up with multiple copies of the same brick in different playsets (i.e., Snap packages duplicating libraries).

So why would someone not want to be turned into a Snap package? Well, in the real world, software doesn’t have feelings, but developers and power users do! There have been debates in the Linux community about using Snap versus traditional apt. Some key points:

  • Speed and Performance: Snap packages can be a bit slower to start compared to their .deb counterparts. For example, if you install the Firefox browser as a Snap (which Ubuntu now does by default), you might notice it takes a moment longer to open the first time. This is because the Snap has to initialize its sandbox (mounting the package’s filesystem and setting up confinement). It’s as if each Snap app has to unpack itself on the fly before it runs. With apt-installed apps, your system already has everything laid out, so launching can be quicker.

  • Sandboxing and Isolation: Snaps run in a kind of sandbox. This means they have limited access to your system by design. It’s a security feature: even if a Snap application is malicious or buggy, it’s fenced in and can’t easily harm the rest of the system. However, that isolation sometimes causes annoyances. For instance, a Snap app might not immediately see files outside its allowed directories unless you give it permission. Or it might not use the exact same theming or settings as non-snap apps, making it feel a bit “out of place” on your desktop. In the meme’s logic, turning a person into a Snap package humorously suggests putting them into a safe, confined box – like grounding someone in tech terms!

  • Updates and Control: Snap packages typically auto-update in the background. There’s a Snap store (run by Canonical) that delivers updates, and your system’s snapd will periodically fetch and install updates for all your Snap apps. You don’t have to manually update them (nice!), but you also can’t easily opt out of an update (not so nice for those who like control). Some advanced users feel this takes away their control over what’s running on their system. The meme taps into that fear a bit: being turned into a Snap package means someone else (Canonical, aka the dad in this case) controls your updates and what version you are. It’s like saying, “be careful or my dad will make it so you have no say in what happens to you – you’ll be updated whether you like it or not!”

  • Open vs Closed Ecosystem: Ubuntu’s apt package system is open and widely used; you can get .deb packages from Ubuntu’s official repos, or third-party repos, or even download one from a developer’s site. Snap, by default, pulls from the Snap Store – a centralized place. While anyone can create Snaps (using a tool called Snapcraft), distributing them usually goes through this Canonical-controlled store. Critics in the OpenSource community sometimes compare this to having an “app store” like on phones, which they worry could lead to gatekeeping. In kiddie threat terms, “my dad will turn you into a Snap” could be read as “my dad will put you into his box where he has all the power.” It’s a playful jab at Canonical’s control over the Snap ecosystem.

Now, imagine you’re a relatively new Ubuntu user or a junior developer. Over the last couple of years, you might notice something odd: you run apt install for a software like Chromium (the web browser), and instead of a normal quick install, Ubuntu actually installs a Snap! (Ubuntu made a controversial choice to ship some apps only as Snaps.) If you didn’t know what a Snap was, you might be confused why the install process felt different. Senior folks who saw this happen were up in arms on forums — it felt sneaky. This meme is referencing exactly that kind of scenario in a jokey way.

So the boy in the meme is effectively yelling: “Don’t bully me, or my dad (who works at Ubuntu’s company) will do something technologically awful to you: he’ll package you up like software in the dreaded Snap format!” It’s a ridiculous escalation, which is why it’s funny. Instead of “My dad will sue you” or “beat you up,” he went with a geeky threat only Linux nerds understand. The image is deliberately low-quality and hastily made, adding to the silliness — like a quickly concocted retort in an online argument.

In the end, understanding this meme means knowing that there’s an ongoing light-hearted feud in the Linux world between old-fashioned package management (apt and .deb) and new methods like Snap. Canonical’s strong push for Snap has rubbed some people the wrong way, enough that being “Snap-ified” is joked about as if it were some form of punishment. For a junior dev, just picture a world where even software packages have personality and drama. This meme is a tiny window into that drama, wrapped in playground humor.

Level 3: The Snap Trap

Seasoned Linux users immediately recognize the package format wars hiding in this meme. The bold threat "My dad works for Canonical and can turn you into a snap package" is dripping with tech irony. It's a tongue-in-cheek reference to Canonical (the company behind Ubuntu, a popular Linux Operating System) pushing their Snap packaging format—often to the chagrin of traditionalists. In classic playground terms, this kid isn’t bragging about a dad who’s a cop or a lawyer; he’s bragging about a dad at Canonical who can inflict the ultimate nerd punishment: repackaging you. For devs in the know, that’s both hilarious and vaguely horrifying. Why? Because being "turned into a Snap package" implies a fate of isolation, slow startups, and corporate-controlled updates. It’s the software equivalent of being locked in a padded room where Canonical holds the key.

Let's unpack the humor from a senior dev’s perspective. Ubuntu historically used .deb packages with the apt package manager (inherited from Debian) for installing software. This was the classic way: each package declares dependencies and the system’s package manager (apt) ensures everything fits together. But Canonical introduced Snap as a new format: a self-contained, sandboxed package with all its needed dependencies bundled inside. In theory, that means no more dependency hell (where installing one app breaks another due to version conflicts) – great, right? Except Snap brought its own hellish quirks:

  • Sandboxing Trade-offs: Snap applications run in a confined environment with limited access to the rest of the system (thanks to tools like AppArmor confinement). This is good for security, but it can make Snap apps feel a bit isolated or restricted (e.g., needing explicit permission to access your files, or trouble integrating with system themes). It’s as if each app lives on its own little island. Senior devs joke that once you’re "in the Snap container," you might be safe, but you’re also cut off – like being in a prison cell for software. So the meme’s threat of “turning you into a snap package” implies encasing you in a digital sandbox where Canonical dictates the rules.

  • Startup Latency: A well-known gripe about Snap packages is that they can be slower to start. The first time you launch a Snap app, the system has to mount a compressed filesystem (Snap uses a squashFS image) and set up the environment. This can introduce a noticeable delay – you click an app and… wait. 🤏 It’s only a few seconds, but to an impatient user or a curmudgeonly sysadmin, that delay feels like eternity. Compare that to traditional apt-installed apps, which typically start snappier (pun intended) since they’re just normal binaries on disk. The meme leverages this annoyance: being turned into a Snap package might mean you’ll be slow to “start up” and always late to the party. In a playground context, that’s a pretty funny twist — “Don’t mess with me or I’ll make your life laggy!”

  • Corporate Control: Here’s where the open-source crowd really raises an eyebrow. With apt (.deb packages), software is usually pulled from open source repositories maintained by the community or the distro maintainers. Snap, on the other hand, is heavily centralized: by default, all Snaps come from the Snapcraft Store, which is run by Canonical. This has been a point of contention in the community (hello, linux_packaging_irony 😏). It’s as if Canonical said, “We know what’s best for you, just get everything from our store.” Some Linux distributions (like Linux Mint) even saw this as such a power move that they disabled or forked away from Snap, in protest of Canonical’s unilateral “flex”. So the kid in the meme is flexing that power: “My dad works for the big boss of Ubuntu-land, and he can literally package you up however he likes.” It lampoons the fear that Canonical can arbitrarily impose their will (cough replacing the Chromium browser apt package with a Snap behind users’ backs cough).

  • Legacy vs Innovation: There’s an underlying generation gap feeling. Senior Unix folks grew up with small, modular tools and the Unix philosophy of simple packages managed by the user. Snap represents a more modern, containerized approach — convenient for developers to ship one package for all distros, but it breaks the old ways a bit. The meme plays on that cultural clash: the brash kid bragging about Snap (new shiny tech) while the “bullies” (old school sysadmins?) prefer the old apt way. It’s a comedic exaggeration of real forum flame wars: “Snap is bloated and slow!” vs “Get with the times, apt is old news!”. Being “turned into a snap” is jokingly like being forced to join the new order against your will. Dependency management becomes dependence on Canonical’s ecosystem — an ultimate punishment for a free-software-loving geek.

In essence, the humor at Level 3 comes from knowing the context. This blurry memetic image combines a childhood playground threat with a very nerdy, very specific Linux controversy. It’s funny because it’s absurd: imagine threatening a bully not with a knuckle sandwich, but with containerization! It tickles that part of a developer’s brain that’s dealt with frustrating package management decisions. The meme screams: “Don’t mess with me, or you’ll end up as a Snap – confined, managed, and at the mercy of auto-updates!” It’s a perfect storm of TechHumor and inside jokes for those who lived through the Snap vs apt debates.

Description

A classic 'my dad works at' schoolyard bully meme showing a chubby kid in a striped shirt with aggressive posture. The text reads 'SHUT UP! My dad works for' followed by the Canonical (Ubuntu) logo, then 'And can turn you into a snap package'. The 'made with mematic' watermark is visible in the bottom left. The joke references the controversial push by Canonical to replace traditional Linux packages with Snap packages, which many in the Linux community view as forced and unwelcome bloatware with slower startup times and sandboxing issues

Comments

18
Anonymous ★ Top Pick Getting snap-packaged is the Linux equivalent of being wrapped in 17 layers of bubble wrap -- technically protected, but unable to move or breathe at normal speed
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    Getting snap-packaged is the Linux equivalent of being wrapped in 17 layers of bubble wrap -- technically protected, but unable to move or breathe at normal speed

  2. Anonymous

    Being turned into a snap package is the ultimate horror: you're suddenly bloated, nobody can figure out your permissions, and you automatically update at 3 AM on a Friday, breaking everyone's workflow

  3. Anonymous

    Careful - once you’re snap-packaged, every coffee break starts with a 3-second cold-start penalty

  4. Anonymous

    The real threat isn't being turned into a snap package - it's having to wait for it to cold-start every time someone tries to execute you, while your systemd mount units multiply faster than a fork bomb in /etc

  5. Anonymous

    Ah yes, Canonical's approach to package management: 'You will use Snap and you will like it' - because nothing says 'open source freedom' quite like replacing your carefully curated apt packages with containerized blobs that mount as loop devices, consume 3x the disk space, and take 5 seconds to launch a text editor. At least when your dad works for Canonical, you get the privilege of explaining to your users why Firefox now takes longer to start than a JVM application from 2005

  6. Anonymous

    Forget SIGKILL - Canonical's real weapon: snapping your app into 10-second startup hell

  7. Anonymous

    Go ahead, turn me into a Snap - immutable, AppArmor-constrained, and slower at cold start while snapd loop-mounts; dependency hell traded for operational purgatory

  8. Anonymous

    Careful - he’ll repackage you as a Snap: 90MB of squashfs, a systemd timer for surprise auto‑updates, and a cold start that makes dpkg feel real‑time

  9. @NickNirus 10mo

    i don't understand why snap exists

    1. @yourdisenchantment 10mo

      snap is created as a native solution of canonical with more protection and the ability to centrally manage these packages in the OS. there is also written about super security, but for now, snap is more unstable than secure

    2. @pyrothefuck 10mo

      Ubuntu wanted its own flatpak

      1. @NickNirus 10mo

        exactly, for what purpose

        1. @hur7m3 10mo

          xkcd_927.jpg

          1. Deleted Account 10mo

            This?

          2. @SamsonovAnton 10mo

            A Brief History of Windows Programming Revolutions By Ron Burk, December 01, 2009 Eliminating DLL-Hell — again First, there was the Windows API and DLL Hell. Revolution # 1 was DDE — remember how hot links let us create status bars showing the current price of Microsoft stock? About that time, Microsoft created the VERSIONINFO resource, which eliminated DLL Hell. But another group within Microsoft discovered a fatal flaw in DDE: they didn't write it! To solve that problem, they created OLE (which was like DDE, only different), and I fondly remember a Microsoft conference speaker proclaiming that the Windows API would soon be rewritten as an OLE API, and every control on the screen would be an OCX. OLE introduced interfaces, which eliminated DLL Hell. Remember "in situ" fever, and how we dreamed of the day that our applications would all be embedded in a (apparently very large) Word document? Somewhere in there, Microsoft got the C++ religion and MFC emerged and solved all our problems again, but with inheritance. Well, OLE wasn't going to take that sitting down, so it re-emerged as COM, and suddenly we realized what OLE (or was it DDE?) was really meant to be all along — and it even included an elaborate component version system that eliminated DLL Hell. Meanwhile, a renegade group within Microsoft discovered a fatal flaw in MFC: they didn't write it! They forthwith corrected that problem by creating ATL, which is like MFC, only different, and tried to hide all those fascinating details that the COM group was trying so hard to teach us. This stimulated the COM group (or was it OLE?) to rename themselves ActiveX and issue hundreds of pounds of new interfaces (even new versioning interfaces, which eliminated DLL Hell), along with the ability to make all our code downloadable via web browsers, complete with user-selectable viruses (ha — try to keep up with that, you ATL weenies!). Like a neglected middle child, the operating systems group cried out for attention by telling us all to "get ready for Cairo", some weird crud that they could never really explain, let alone ship. To their credit, however, the operating system group did introduce the concept of "System File Protection", which eliminated DLL Hell. Meanwhile, another group inside Microsoft discovered a fatal flaw in Java: they didn't write it! That was remedied by creating J, or Jole, or ActiveJ (honestly, I can't remember the name), which was like Java, only different. That was very exciting, but Sun sued Microsoft under some archaic law that limits the amount of crapulence any one company can ship in a year. This was clearly an attempt to stifle Microsoft's freedom to create products that are like other products, only different, and resulted in the creation of The Microsoft Freedom to Stuff Money in the Trousers of Congressmen Network (newsletter and $14.75 T-shirts available). Remember the J/Jole/ActiveJ program manager pounding his shoe on the table and insisting that Microsoft would never abandon his product? Silly wabbit! All this could mean only one thing — too little attention for the ActiveX (or was it COM?) group. This incredibly resilient herd of API gushers came back strong with COM+ (shouldn't that have been ActiveX+?), and MTS. (I have no idea why there's no "COM" or "Active" or "X" or "+" in "MTS" — they totally shocked me with that one!) They also threatened to add yet another "+" onto all their buzzwords in the very near future. Around that time, someone was yelling about "Windows DNA" and the "Windows Washboard" for a while, but that died out before I ever figured out what it was.

          3. @SamsonovAnton 10mo

            At this point, Microsoft had been watching the Internet for several years with growing unease. Recently, they came to the realization that there was a fatal flaw in the Internet: well, you probably know what it was. And that brings us up to date with .NET (pronounced like "doughnut", only different), which is like the Internet, only with more press releases. Let's be very, very clear about one thing: .NET will eliminate DLL Hell. .NET includes a new programming language called C# (turns out there was a fatal flaw in Active++Jspresso, so just as well it died). .NET includes a virtual runtime machine that all languages will use (turns out there's a fatal flaw in relying on Intel CPUs). .NET includes a single logon system (turns out there's a fatal flaw in not storing all your passwords on Microsoft's servers). In fact, it's probably easier to list all the things that .NET does not include. .NET is absolutely going to revolutionize Windows programming... until next year.

  10. @Johnny_bit 10mo

    appimage better

  11. @Diotost 10mo

    And now this large chain of fatal flaws brought us Windows 11.

Use J and K for navigation