The Four Stages of Writing 0.5 in Code
Description
A four-panel 'Expanding Brain' meme illustrating progressively more obscure ways to represent the number 0.5 in programming. The first panel shows '1/2' next to a simple brain scan, representing the most basic fractional form. The second panel displays '0.5' with a slightly more illuminated brain, the standard decimal notation. The third panel shows '.5', a common code shorthand, with an even brighter brain. The final panel, representing the highest level of enlightenment or 'galaxy brain,' shows the expression 'TRUE / 2' next to a brain radiating pure energy. The humor is aimed at developers who understand type coercion, where in many languages the boolean value 'TRUE' is implicitly cast to the integer 1, making the expression evaluate to 0.5. It's a joke about discovering language quirks and writing 'clever' code that is often unreadable and considered bad practice, despite being technically correct
Comments
50Comment deleted
The final panel is how you write 0.5 when your goal is to make the next developer who maintains your code question their career choice during a pull request
Peak engineering: express 0.5 as (true / 2) so the compiler and the next maintainer both experience implicit coercion
This is the same code that passed review because the senior who wrote it 'has been doing JavaScript since before you were born' and insists that truthy division is a valid performance optimization
The real galaxy brain move is when you realize that in JavaScript, (true / 2) === 0.5 but (true + true) / 2 also equals 1, making boolean arithmetic the most elegant way to confuse junior developers during code reviews while technically being completely valid. It's the programming equivalent of 'just because you can, doesn't mean you should' - a principle we all learned after that one time we chained 47 ternary operators because we thought it made us look clever
TRUE/2: the half-truth every JS dev lives by
TRUE/2 is the quickest way to make JS and Python tests green, Go fail the build, Rust file a grievance, and your next code review add “no implicit coercion” to the lint rules
Lint bans magic numbers? Fine - use TRUE/2; it’s self-documenting, leverages type coercion, and accurately describes the codebase: a half‑truth
the problem is that true is not always equal to 1 Comment deleted
No Comment deleted
Any number except zero can be true Comment deleted
But true is always one. Comment deleted
in what programming language ?) Comment deleted
I don't know of any programming lang where true is not 1. However, some don't allow implicit conversions. Comment deleted
If you convert 5 to Boolean, you get True if you convert True to Integer, you get 1 Works in Python and JS. I didn't check other languages. Comment deleted
You can print(true+1) in almost any language and get 2: C++,java,python... But there is also Ruby and maybe smth else where true works strange. Comment deleted
Really Comment deleted
syka eshe raz takyuy huety pizdanete...... Comment deleted
*suka yeshyo raz takuyu huyetu pizdanyotye... Comment deleted
please talk english or provide a translation to your text Comment deleted
i just corrected the guy above. Here's the translation: fuck, if you fucking say that fucking thing just one more time... Comment deleted
it's alright, I didn't warn either of you Comment deleted
thanks Comment deleted
you too Comment deleted
Ooo, vi tozhe iz anglii?)) Comment deleted
Translate: Ooo, you are from england too Comment deleted
I can‘t deal with the fact that non-null objects are TRUE in php… Comment deleted
you can deal with the fact in Ruby if you like. Also in Ruby 0 is True. Comment deleted
fuck ruby ngl Comment deleted
ngl? Comment deleted
not gonna lie Comment deleted
thanks, I didn't know this one. And speaking of 0 == True in Ruby, IMHO you shouldn't rely on implicit conversions too much. Explicit may be a bit slower to work with, but it is less likely to present some bugs. Comment deleted
aye, I absolutely agree. Still, fuck ruby Comment deleted
Ruby is fine. Rails are fucked though Comment deleted
Some languages are value specific and don't have booleans like C. Others accomodate booleans too and are boolean strict. Comment deleted
While the likes of python don't allow interconversion at all. (Unless a module is used.) Comment deleted
python does allow some implicit conversions. True/2==0.5 in python. Comment deleted
true * 0.5 Comment deleted
ooo kurwa Comment deleted
#define TRUE 666 Comment deleted
just use true / (double)(true << true) Comment deleted
Does in any language .5 work? Comment deleted
in Russian it doesn't Comment deleted
Ерiс Comment deleted
css Comment deleted
1. >> 1 Comment deleted
I dont think that will work as bit shift is performed on integers, not decimals. At least in Python 3, it gives me an error Comment deleted
well yeah, you could (theiretically) do it with integer to get 5, and then use casting magic to turn it into 0.5, but that is cursed as hell Comment deleted
someone said casting magic? double d = 1.0; long long temp = ( (*(unsigned long long*)&d) & ~0x7ff0000000000000) | ( ( ( (*(unsigned long long*)&d) >> 52) - 1) << 52); d = *(double*)&temp; std::cout << d << std::endl; Comment deleted
Carmack detected Comment deleted
you can try it out online https://godbolt.org/z/8nqEv5bjW Comment deleted