When Stack Overflow Gets Blocked
Description
The image is a photo of a Dell laptop screen showing a browser attempting to open Stack Overflow, with many tabs visible across the top. A centered red-bordered warning says `Sorry, you don't have permission to visit this website.` and explains `You are not permitted to perform this action due to` a blurred company `Information Security Policy`; it also says `Not allowed the use of this system and development site`, lists `Stackoverflow.com`, and includes `See our internet use policy`. The humor is that a company has blocked one of the most common developer reference and troubleshooting sites under the banner of security. For engineers, it captures the absurd productivity cost of blunt corporate filtering policies that treat knowledge lookup as risky behavior.
Comments
26Comment deleted
Blocking Stack Overflow for security is a bold way to replace copy-pasted answers with copy-pasted despair.
1984 Comment deleted
It says a lot about society... Comment deleted
It's like restricting books usage, as they provide information Comment deleted
Nope. SO usage is bad. People don't know what are they doing and why - just copy-paste shitty code from the site and let it roll. And then comes imposter syndrome and other problems. Use only official documentation for the tools you're using, maybe some dedicated highly specific forum too. Not SO. Its a way to disaster. Comment deleted
Depends on the type of question. For the basic code monkey tasks absolutely. For more general CS tasks and algorithms where you can't copy paste the result the quality of answers is significantly better. And I'd take serverfault over Ubuntu forums (or Microsoft ones) any day. The issue with SO is that they tried to gamify answering questions and they disproportionately reward the first set which has the worst signal to noise ratio so the more useful questions get little attention. Comment deleted
I always use the principle, not the solution itself, I've never copied anything from it, it's like an additional step for getting some popular problem's solution before going to docs Comment deleted
Why do you think that if someone goes to SO for the answers then they will surely copy-paste code from the answer without thinking? I'm using SO sometimes but i'm doing it by reading the answer and without any copy-pasting. Comment deleted
Because too many people do it like ir have described. If you do it once a month, controllably and thoughtfully- then no problem. But, like with drinking or drugs, people tend to abuse it. So it is easier for a company to just block it (like with drugs) . Comment deleted
Like that ever worked. Comment deleted
It's not 1984 Comment deleted
It's 451 Comment deleted
Imagine the gigachads who work there Comment deleted
(they don't know shit) Comment deleted
They just search answers on mail.ru Comment deleted
Where people are ROFLing from questions Comment deleted
Mail.ru is the modern day Library of Alexandria Comment deleted
Only with regard to it must be burned? 😁 Comment deleted
As if those who use SO know anything besides copy-paste. Comment deleted
Вот пидорасы (Very bad persons) Comment deleted
people* Comment deleted
Few years ago boss asks me to not visit StackOverflow when I am in work. Not because he was despotic (he was but this is not a point why) but because I often answer to other people questions and only somethimes looking for help stuff for me. Comment deleted
what if their policy is whitelist based? Comment deleted
then their policy sucks Comment deleted
from cybersecurity point of view it does great job Comment deleted
Well, https://youtu.be/AS3kA_AtRTo Comment deleted