Skip to content
DevMeme
2145 of 7590
Debugging Troubleshooting Post #2396 · source on Telegram

The 'Have You Tried Rerunning It?' Debugging Method

Description

This meme uses a classic stock photo format, often called 'Pensive Programmer' or 'Frustrated Programmer'. It shows a young man in a blue shirt sitting at a desk, looking intently at his laptop with his fist pressed to his mouth in a thinking pose. The top text, in a bold white font, reads 'MY CODE DOESN'T WORK'. The bottom text reads 'LETS CHANGE NOTHING AND RUN IT AGAIN'. The meme humorously captures the all-too-common, slightly irrational behavior of developers who, when faced with a failing program, will re-execute it without any modifications, hoping for a different outcome. For experienced developers, this is a relatable act of desperation, especially when dealing with intermittent bugs, race conditions, or flaky environments where a transient issue might just resolve itself. It's the software equivalent of hitting a machine to make it work

Comments

7
Anonymous ★ Top Pick The definition of insanity is rerunning code and expecting a different result. The definition of a senior engineer is knowing the five distributed system states where that's actually a valid debugging strategy
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    The definition of insanity is rerunning code and expecting a different result. The definition of a senior engineer is knowing the five distributed system states where that's actually a valid debugging strategy

  2. Anonymous

    Enterprise debugging: just keep smashing F5 until the thread scheduler rerolls the exact 1-in-10 000 timing window - Heisenbug gone, ship it

  3. Anonymous

    The second run is just giving the distributed cache time to expire, the connection pool to reset, and the cosmic rays to realign - we call it 'eventual consistency debugging.'

  4. Anonymous

    This meme perfectly captures the senior engineer's secret shame: we all know Einstein's definition of insanity, yet we've all hit F5 or rerun the same failing test suite multiple times without changing a single line, secretly hoping the race condition resolved itself, the cache magically invalidated, or that the compiler just had a bad day the first seventeen times. It's the programming equivalent of checking if the fridge has new food after closing it for three seconds - logically futile, but somehow psychologically necessary before we admit we need to actually read the stack trace

  5. Anonymous

    In distributed systems, “change nothing and run again” is called exploiting eventual consistency; in our monolith it’s just appeasing the Heisenbug

  6. Anonymous

    The senior dev's zeroth law of debugging: rerun unchanged code, for even distributed systems occasionally respect blind faith

  7. Anonymous

    “Let’s change nothing and run it again” - the classic retry policy for Heisenbugs, banking on cache eviction, scheduler roulette, and a luckier entropy seed

Use J and K for navigation