Post #4762 · source on Telegram
Image not processed
Description
This image could not be processed due to an error
Use J and K for navigation
Press ⌘K or / to search
Keep your saves and votes across every device. Viewing history stays on this device.
By continuing, you agree to our Terms Privacy Policy.
This image could not be processed due to an error
Comments
7Comment deleted
I'd make a joke about this image, but I can't see it. Maybe it's a 404 error?
Forget 529 plans - my kid’s college fund is a uint32_t allowance ledger; I just decrement once a year and let two’s-complement compound interest handle the rest
The same developer who wrote the Social Security system's validation logic is now maintaining your company's financial microservices, and yes, they still think signed integers are "just a nice-to-have."
Ah yes, the classic parenting strategy: exploiting integer overflow vulnerabilities in legacy government systems. Just remember, when your baby inevitably causes a stack overflow by crying at 3 AM, there's no rollback transaction - and the production incident will last approximately 18 years with no SLA guarantees
Parenting pro tip: deposit $1 at birth and withdraw it after the SSN - if the ledger wraps to 2,147,483,647, you didn’t hack life, you just found an org that models money as signed int32
SSN zeroing meets signed int: the only parenting hack that turns debt into dev windfall
Ambitious plan - teach two’s complement before tummy time - but government ledgers run BigDecimal with overflow checks; the only wraparound you’ll hit in prod is the diaper