I'd make a joke about this image, but I can't see it. Maybe it's a 404 error?
A
Anonymous★ Top Pick
Our security pipeline is basically: copy Stack Overflow answer to prod, wait for the bug-bounty report, then copy their PoC into the test suite and call it continuous delivery
A
Anonymous★ Top Pick
The best security posture is admitting your entire codebase is held together by accepted Stack Overflow answers from 2012 and hoping the scammers give up out of pity
A
Anonymous★ Top Pick
When your entire architecture is held together by Stack Overflow answers and prayer, 'responsible disclosure' takes on a whole new meaning - the bug bounty hunter is essentially being asked to reverse-engineer someone else's copy-pasted solution to fix a vulnerability in code the team doesn't understand. It's like hiring a structural engineer to fix your house, only to discover it was built entirely from IKEA instructions you can't read, and now you're asking them to also provide the missing Allen wrench and assembly guide
A
Anonymous★ Top Pick
When the vendor asks the researcher to include the fix, you've outsourced code ownership to your bug-bounty program: SDLC-by-Stack-Overflow
A
Anonymous★ Top Pick
Nothing says “mature SDLC” like a bug bounty that asks for the patch - SODD: Stack Overflow - Driven Development, where the database layer’s bus factor is one expired link
A
Anonymous★ Top Pick
Bug bounties: because no architect ever modeled a schema around yesterday's Stack Overflow hotfix
Comments
7Comment deleted
I'd make a joke about this image, but I can't see it. Maybe it's a 404 error?
Our security pipeline is basically: copy Stack Overflow answer to prod, wait for the bug-bounty report, then copy their PoC into the test suite and call it continuous delivery
The best security posture is admitting your entire codebase is held together by accepted Stack Overflow answers from 2012 and hoping the scammers give up out of pity
When your entire architecture is held together by Stack Overflow answers and prayer, 'responsible disclosure' takes on a whole new meaning - the bug bounty hunter is essentially being asked to reverse-engineer someone else's copy-pasted solution to fix a vulnerability in code the team doesn't understand. It's like hiring a structural engineer to fix your house, only to discover it was built entirely from IKEA instructions you can't read, and now you're asking them to also provide the missing Allen wrench and assembly guide
When the vendor asks the researcher to include the fix, you've outsourced code ownership to your bug-bounty program: SDLC-by-Stack-Overflow
Nothing says “mature SDLC” like a bug bounty that asks for the patch - SODD: Stack Overflow - Driven Development, where the database layer’s bus factor is one expired link
Bug bounties: because no architect ever modeled a schema around yesterday's Stack Overflow hotfix