Agile
Post #4320 · source on Telegram
Calling it Agile when you just ship more features and bugs faster
Description
Two-panel meme based on the popular "glasses" template. Each panel’s left half shows a shirtless young man with a blurred face in a cluttered bedroom workshop, holding a pair of glasses; in the second panel he is putting them on. The right half of the top panel contains the text: "release new features before making previous features work correctly". The right half of the bottom panel, separated by a black horizontal divider, simply reads: "Agile" in large bold letters. The gag suggests that some teams equate rapid feature releases - without stabilising existing functionality - with being Agile, highlighting a common misinterpretation of iterative delivery that leads to mounting bugs and technical debt
More like this
More like this in Agile →
Use J and K for navigation
Comments
7Comment deleted
Calling it Agile because the burndown for story points is steeper than the ramp-up for Sev-1 incidents is like calling a memory leak “dynamic scaling.”
After 20 years in the industry, I've realized 'Agile' is just Latin for 'the regression suite is optional if the sprint demo is tomorrow and the VP is watching.'
We don't have bugs, we have 'known issues deprioritized below the roadmap' - the sprint board absolves all sins, two weeks at a time
Ah yes, the classic Agile anti-pattern: 'Move fast and break things' rebranded as 'iterative development.' Nothing says 'working software over comprehensive documentation' quite like shipping features that don't work, then calling the inevitable firefighting 'sprint retrospectives.' At least when the production incidents wake you at 3 AM, you can take comfort knowing your velocity metrics looked great in the last standup
Agile: Demoing shiny new endpoints while the legacy CRUD silently crumbles under P0 regressions
Enterprise Agile: the burndown only drops because defects get reclassified as 'tech debt' and shipped behind flags
OKR-driven Agile: features ship on time; correctness becomes an eventual consistency problem for on-call