Skip to content
DevMeme
6843 of 7435
Vibe Coding Founders Shocked by First Cloud Resource Bill
Cloud Post #7502, on Dec 2, 2025 in TG

Vibe Coding Founders Shocked by First Cloud Resource Bill

Description

A meme showing Snoop Dogg at what appears to be a sporting event, lifting his sunglasses with a shocked and bewildered expression. He's wearing a white jacket with an NBC/Snoop Dogg logo. The top text reads: 'Vibe coding founders when they vibe deploy and get their first bad vibes Cloud Resource Bill'. The meme captures the moment of reckoning when startup founders who've been building apps through 'vibe coding' (using AI to generate code without deep technical understanding) encounter the financial reality of cloud infrastructure costs for the first time. The shocked expression perfectly conveys the sticker shock of seeing auto-scaled cloud bills

Comments

28
Anonymous ★ Top Pick The vibe was immaculate until AWS decided the monthly bill should also have main character energy
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    The vibe was immaculate until AWS decided the monthly bill should also have main character energy

  2. @roped 7mo

    same for me with anthropic api bills

  3. @roped 7mo

    im moving to deepsek

  4. @DavidGarciaCat 7mo

    What about self-hosted?

    1. @chupasaurus 7mo

      Imagine smiling Jensen Huang

      1. @DavidGarciaCat 7mo

        Nope… I prefer to get AI processes 1s slower than adding 3 zeroes to my bills

  5. @DavidGarciaCat 7mo

    Unless we deal with a life-or-death situation, speed is cool, but we need to understand (as a society) that sometimes we need to slow down

    1. @chupasaurus 7mo

      I know a project with compilation time of 8 hours. Do you really want that?)

      1. @azizhakberdiev 7mo

        me when I compile entire codebase instead of breaking it down to components

        1. @chupasaurus 7mo

          good luck breaking down compiler to components

          1. @SamsonovAnton 7mo

            Sure! Why not? Or are you talking about specific compiler what was designed monolithic?

            1. @chupasaurus 7mo

              that specific compiler had to be monolithic

  6. @DavidGarciaCat 7mo

    I don't want anything, just saying that GPUs are expensive and maybe (just maybe) the final user should wait while a non-GPU server runs an AI process

    1. @azizhakberdiev 7mo

      just order your own circuit with parallel processing from tsmc

    2. @chupasaurus 7mo

      currently high memory server would cost you more than a GPU 😁

      1. @DavidGarciaCat 7mo

        It depends on the provider

  7. @DavidGarciaCat 7mo

    Also, I am not sure if 8h of compilation time is good either (because I don't know the details of the project)… maybe optimise the app instead?

  8. @mrYakov 7mo

    Btw, main thing about cloud computing is flexibility. If today your app got a lot of users, you just scale up. And if tomorrow they move out, you just scale down. But if you have consistent user base, self host will be much cheaper.

    1. @chupasaurus 7mo

      the main thing about cloud computing is not giving a f about infra. selfhost is way cheaper in any case

      1. @mrYakov 7mo

        Nope, its not. Imagine ordering top end gpu cluster only to realise that product unpopular and gpu sit idle 99% of time.

        1. @chupasaurus 7mo

          Imagine buying a hall of mainframes to start the bank only to realise you need none of them

          1. @chupasaurus 7mo

            Overcommitment is a CTO problem, not the solution choice

        2. @azizhakberdiev 7mo

          tech failures aren't uncommon that's why we know how to estimate

  9. @DavidGarciaCat 7mo

    Instead of thinking about AWS, GCP or Azure (the big three) why not thinking about cheaper providers that give you a preset CPU and RAM? It's the same exact thing Cloud providers are super-expensive because they want you to fall into the K8S trap (which, in the end, launches even more servers, aka more expensive invoices)

    1. @chupasaurus 7mo

      Exhale

    2. @azizhakberdiev 7mo

      it's really not, they have shareholders above their heads constantly setting higher and higher revenue goals each quarter and they do care about issue of servers not being used as well, they can't simply downscale themselves either. But one or two failed projects canceling their purchase aren't going to be their end

    3. @chupasaurus 7mo

      an actual cheap provider will provide you a rack space, an electric outlet and network connection.

  10. @DavidGarciaCat 7mo

    Where I work, we have just cut 60% of the total expenses by leaving the big cloud providers, because we don't have any needs that require their expensive infrastructure 🤷‍♂️

Use J and K for navigation