Skip to content
DevMeme
2757 of 7435
The Universal Struggle of the Git Commit Message
VersionControl Post #3046, on May 7, 2021 in TG

The Universal Struggle of the Git Commit Message

Description

A two-panel meme capturing a common developer dilemma. The top panel features the character Lenny Leonard from The Simpsons, dressed in a tuxedo, staring intently and anxiously at a classic beige CRT monitor, with his fingers steepled in deep, troubled thought. The bottom panel shows a screenshot of a command line terminal. The text in the terminal reads '% git add .' on the first line, and '% git commit -m '' followed by a blinking cursor on the second. This visual pairing perfectly illustrates the moment of 'writer's block' that developers experience after staging their changes with 'git add'. The difficult part isn't the code, but summarizing complex work into a coherent and useful commit message. The meme is highly relatable to any developer who has stared at that blinking cursor, struggling to encapsulate their last few hours of work into a single line of text

Comments

19
Anonymous ★ Top Pick Hours of complex refactoring, debugging, and testing can be perfectly summarized in a single, elegant commit message: 'WIP'
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    Hours of complex refactoring, debugging, and testing can be perfectly summarized in a single, elegant commit message: 'WIP'

  2. Anonymous

    I can live with eventual consistency in prod, but my commit messages still have to be strictly serializable across all future 3 AM debugs

  3. Anonymous

    After 15 years, I've written enterprise-scale distributed systems, but still freeze when git add . stages that .env file I forgot was there, and now I'm crafting a commit message that sounds professional while internally screaming about having to force-push to fix production secrets

  4. Anonymous

    Every senior engineer knows this existential moment: you've staged everything with 'git add .', your fingers hover over the keyboard, and suddenly you're paralyzed by the weight of commit message philosophy. Do you go with 'fix stuff'? 'WIP'? Or do you actually document what you changed? The real technical debt isn't the code you're committing - it's the semantic debt of every vague commit message that will haunt your git log during that 3 AM production incident six months from now when you're desperately trying to git bisect your way to salvation

  5. Anonymous

    Staring at git commit -m ' because you need a message that explains a monorepo-wide git add ., satisfies Conventional Commits, and won’t be Exhibit A at the next postmortem

  6. Anonymous

    git add . is O(1); writing a message that survives git blame and semantic-release is amortized O(career)

  7. @feskow 5y

    git push <error> git push --force rm -rf /*

  8. @Danich 5y

    https://whatthecommit.com/

    1. @RiedleroD 5y

      …that's not a real website.

      1. @NoCountryForOldBuffet 5y

        Should just be http I think, http://whatthecommit.com/

        1. @RiedleroD 5y

          oh, I see

        2. @RiedleroD 5y

          quality content

        3. @Danich 5y

          Yup :(

  9. @Vlasoov 5y

    -u: Am I joke to you?

  10. @pavlohozhyi 5y

    -m "Update"

  11. @jMdZzZ 5y

    -m '.'

  12. @Vandervir 5y

    -m "Task numer: Task title"

  13. @Truth_0000 5y

    Just like naming a variable

  14. @diafour 5y

    -m ++

Use J and K for navigation