Skip to content
DevMeme
4279 of 7435
When Python asks C++ for a name and gets a pointer-speed flex
Languages Post #4676, on Jul 19, 2022 in TG

When Python asks C++ for a name and gets a pointer-speed flex

Description

Eight equal rectangular panels (a 2×4 grid) feature the Python logo (blue-yellow snake) and the C++ logo (blue hexagon with "C++" text) speaking in alternating speech bubbles. The dialogue, panel-by-panel from left-to-right, top-to-bottom, is: “Hi there, what’s your name?” / “What do you want?” / “oh... nothing, just asking about your name” / “you are saying wierd things, what the heck is my name?!” / “… your name, like I am called Python, you?” / “I don’t know what you are talking about…” / “Hold my pointer kiddo. What is your std::string name?” / “Hi dad, it’s C++. done in 0.0000001”. Visually, each bubble’s tail points to the corresponding logo, emphasizing which language is speaking. The joke plays on C++’s obsession with pointers, explicit types (std::string) and micro-optimisations, while Python tries to hold a simple, dynamically-typed conversation. Senior developers will recognise it as classic language-war humour contrasting static vs dynamic typing verbosity and C++’s performance bragging rights

Comments

6
Anonymous ★ Top Pick Python: “What’s your name?” C++: “constexpr std::string_view me = std::source_location::current().function_name(); - sure, it took two headers and four new keywords, but those 3 ns I saved will pay off at hyperscale.”
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    Python: “What’s your name?” C++: “constexpr std::string_view me = std::source_location::current().function_name(); - sure, it took two headers and four new keywords, but those 3 ns I saved will pay off at hyperscale.”

  2. Anonymous

    This is why our C++ service takes 47 seconds to start up - it's still trying to figure out what a string is without seventeen template parameters and a custom allocator

  3. Anonymous

    This perfectly captures the existential crisis of asking C++ for its 'name' - a language so obsessed with type safety and explicit declarations that it needs std::string qualification just to introduce itself, while simultaneously flexing that it finished the entire conversation in 0.0000001 seconds. Meanwhile, Python's still waiting for the GIL to release so it can process the response

  4. Anonymous

    Python chats names casually; C++ holds a pointer and clocks std::string in nanoseconds - because who needs GC when you've got raw speed?

  5. Anonymous

    Python: “What’s your name?” C++: “Demangled symbol or small‑string‑optimized std::string with your allocator?” Runtime in microseconds; compile time in fiscal quarters

  6. Anonymous

    Only in C++ does a casual “what’s your name?” trigger a debate over ownership semantics and string_view vs std::string - by the time it compiles noexcept, Python has already printed it and benchmarked the greeting to 1e-7s

Use J and K for navigation