Skip to content
DevMeme
603 of 7590
Performance Post #689 · source on Telegram

When Your Brute-Force Solution Finally Passes

Description

A two-part meme combining a coding challenge result with a reaction image. The top portion is a screenshot of a submission result from a platform like LeetCode. It shows a 'Success' status with the performance details: 'Runtime: 979 ms, faster than 0.53% of Java online submissions for Unique Paths.' This indicates the solution is correct but extremely inefficient. The bottom portion features the 'I am speed' meme, which is a photo of a red Mazda Miata modified to resemble the character Lightning McQueen from 'Cars,' complete with a goofy, toothy grin. A yellow subtitle below the car reads, 'I am speed.' The humor stems from the stark irony of celebrating an incredibly slow and poorly performing algorithm as if it were a high-speed achievement

Comments

7
Anonymous ★ Top Pick My first solution is always O(n!). I call it the 'job security' algorithm, because it guarantees I'll have performance tickets to work on for the next three sprints
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    My first solution is always O(n!). I call it the 'job security' algorithm, because it guarantees I'll have performance tickets to work on for the next three sprints

  2. Anonymous

    LeetCode calling 979 ms a “Success” is basically /healthz returning 200 while the p99 latency pages SRE - technically alive, functionally a denial-of-service on yourself

  3. Anonymous

    When your recursive solution without memoization beats exactly one person who accidentally submitted their IDE's entire .git folder

  4. Anonymous

    When your dynamic programming solution has more overlapping subproblems than a corporate org chart and runs slower than a garbage collector on a 16GB heap, but you still hit 'Submit' because technically it passed. The real O(n!) was the friends we made along the way - and by friends, I mean the 99.47% of developers who wrote better solutions while you were debugging why your memoization table was actually just a HashMap with extra steps

  5. Anonymous

    LeetCode says 'Success'; the JVM says 'still warming up' - O(mn) DP with cache-hostile loop order is the Miata of runtimes: smiling, not sprinting

  6. Anonymous

    Beating 0.53% on Unique Paths: because in Java LeetCode, 979ms is just your DP table politely waiting for GC

  7. Anonymous

    979 ms, faster than 0.53% - my streamy Java DP turned Unique Paths into Unique Allocations; the only thing moving fast was the GC. I am speed

Use J and K for navigation