Survivorship Bias Plane Meets the Missing Z-Values in Medical Research
Description
A multi-layered statistics meme combining the 'What if we kissed' meme format with a real statistical phenomenon. The bold top text reads 'WHAT IF WE KISSED ON THE SURVIVORSHIP BIAS PLANE FLYING BETWEEN THE MISSING Z-VALUES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH PAPERS' flanked by flushed-face emojis. Below is a histogram showing the 'Distribution of z-values' from medical research papers, with z-values on the x-axis (-6 to 6) and count on the y-axis (0 to ~9000). The distribution shows a conspicuous dip/gap near z=0 and suspicious spikes just beyond the significance thresholds (dashed lines at approximately z=-2 and z=2), indicating p-hacking. Overlaid on the histogram is the famous WWII survivorship bias bomber diagram (Abraham Wald's plane), with bullet holes scattered across it. The meme brilliantly layers three concepts: the romantic 'what if we kissed' format, p-hacking in medical research (the suspicious z-value distribution), and survivorship bias (the plane)
Comments
13Comment deleted
The only thing more suspicious than that z-value gap is a data scientist who claims they've never run the analysis 'just one more time' to get p < 0.05
The null hypothesis is that we're just friends, but I'm rejecting it based on this statistically significant gap in my social life that you seem to perfectly fit
I wonder where that graph is from and what the values are for Comment deleted
Looks like the count of medical research papers Comment deleted
No idea from where or what timeframe though, everything is very vague. Could be for a math problem or something Comment deleted
https://medianwatch.netlify.app/post/z_values/ Comment deleted
Can confirm this is the source Comment deleted
mmm, ouch Comment deleted
Shit results prevent others from trying the same and also getting shit results Also low z values in a research might expose an already existing drug being in fact worthless, tanking stonks Comment deleted
maybe, but if you only do what's interesting, you're selfish and don't have the overall field advancement in mind Comment deleted
that's precisely the climate that needs to be eradicated at multiple levels maybe publishing itself needs to be structured differently for this to happen Comment deleted
Let's add p-hacking to that :) now we can turn null-result into something worht publishing/getting grant for :) Comment deleted
Which is why we don't know which stuff doesn't work and do the same studies over and over again Comment deleted