VPN Vendors Yelling Past Each Other About Who Sees Your Traffic
Description
A dark-mode X.com screenshot of a quote-tweet battle between two VPN companies. Windscribe (@windscribecom) repeats four times in all caps: 'VPN IS A TRUST SHIFT SERVICE, IT CAN SEE THE SAME THINGS YOUR ISP CAN'. It quotes a Proton VPN (@ProtonVPN) post that repeats five times: 'YOUR ISP CAN SEE YOUR TRAFFIC, USE A VPN'. Engagement metrics show 97 replies, 182 reposts, 3.5K likes, 242K views. The meme captures the security-marketing reality check: a VPN does not eliminate traffic visibility, it merely moves the trusted observer from your ISP to the VPN provider - a nuance most consumer VPN advertising conveniently omits
Comments
22Comment deleted
A VPN doesn't remove the man in the middle - it just lets you pick which man invoices you monthly
A VPN doesn't delete the trust boundary; it gives it a logo and a subscription plan.
Windscribe and Mullvad are the REAL Based VPN companies, not Proton, Nord or (especially) Kape Comment deleted
And still, nothing beats the custom vpn server in a good country with properly set up encryption Comment deleted
This Comment deleted
Good country? Give me an example Comment deleted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzdJsRmRTyw Comment deleted
depending on individual needs, I just use Swiss for torrenting and Ger just if I need VPN and speed. Comment deleted
It reminds me of that russian guy, how rented a flat in Kaliningrad just to set up starlink + vpn in it, cause elon banned his service in the rest of russia Comment deleted
mmmm, good country... Comment deleted
Anything with internet, corrupt and unresponsive government, like Bulgaria for example, if you can find cloud providers with hosting there (not germany bulk reseller) Comment deleted
VPS is a trust shift service, as the hosting provider can see the same things your ISP or VPN service provider can. 😝 Who cares, though, given that virtually all traffic is TLS-protected anyway (except online gaming, perhaps)? Comment deleted
The traffic itself is encrypted yeah, but still much info can be attributed via side channels, like when a host on watchlist has been contacted, by whom and so on. This allows malicious actors to still build fuzzy but extremely useful datamap. The VPS alleviates this given you share it with friends, so all silly things of all of you make up a "super villan" to the outside Comment deleted
But why are you trying to contact a watchlisted host, in the first place? Are you up to something — like downloading extremist tools, such as 7-Zip or SPECcpu? 😆 Comment deleted
How about chain of multiple servers on different countries? Comment deleted
And make them rotate based on the weather and crackhead math... Just to be sure) Such is think is justified if you are selling smth on darknet, too expensive for personal usage Comment deleted
i2p isn't expensive for personal use 😉 Comment deleted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaJ0hCTCvdY Comment deleted
Most paid VPNs will be better than your ISP - including Nord and the like. If you read your ISP's privacy policy, you'll likely be horrified (if you're in the US anyway). Most paid VPNs have much better privacy policies, since that's what they're selling. Comment deleted
What about EU ISPs ? I guess GPRD and the like force them to have somewhat reasonable policies, but are they on par or still worse than VPNs ? Comment deleted
The perfect is the enemy of the good. If you have the time and energy to get a very excellent VPN, do so - but if you're facing decision paralysis, it's ok to get one that's good enough Comment deleted
I dunno, that's why I added the "at least in the US" qualifier. Definitely less of a privacy nightmare than over here, but not sure by what degree Comment deleted