When the dev community demands yet another 'programmers are roosters' meme
Description
The image uses the classic two-panel “Babe, it’s time for your X” Wojak template. On the left, a cartoon woman with long brown hair and a bright red turtleneck clasps her hands together; beneath her is the caption: “Babe! It’s 4:20 it’s time for your another ‘Programmers are roosters’ meme.” On the right, a monochrome sketched Wojak head answers with bold text: “Yes honey.” The meme satirizes how developer circles relentlessly recycle overly specific inside jokes - here, the absurd idea that programmers are analogous to roosters - highlighting meme fatigue and self-referential humor within engineering communities. Visually simple with high-contrast text, it relies on viewers’ familiarity with both the template and niche programming jokes for its punchline
Comments
36Comment deleted
The “programmers are roosters” meme is just a legacy cron job: fires at 4:20, wakes everyone up, nobody remembers why it’s there, and every senior dev is terrified to comment it out in case prod stops crowing
After 20 years in the industry, you realize the real recursion isn't in your code - it's the infinite loop of junior devs discovering the same 'programmers wake up early like roosters' joke and thinking they've struck comedy gold
The real reason we call it 'production support' is because it's the only job where 4:20 AM is both a wake-up call and a lifestyle choice. At least roosters get to crow about their schedule - we just get to explain to our partners why Kubernetes decided 4 AM was the perfect time to test our disaster recovery procedures. Again
Babel: letting rooster-devs crow modern JS in IE6 dialects at 4:20 AM
If your community’s content pipeline is cron(20 4 * * *), redeploying the same ‘programmers are roosters’ artifact, it’s time to add a Bloom‑filter dedupe and a ‘no‑poultry’ feature flag
The 4:20 daily “programmers are roosters” meme is basically our incident drill: a cron that crows, the team auto-ACKs “Yes honey,” and management calls it observability
7:20 for me actually Comment deleted
10:20 for me actually Comment deleted
3:20 for me actually Comment deleted
8:20 for me actually Comment deleted
6:20 for me actually Comment deleted
Now we know admin's tz Comment deleted
wow its 4:20 Comment deleted
you are in the middle of atlantic Comment deleted
i am in Moscow :( Comment deleted
when you sent that picture it was 11:32 here Comment deleted
7 hour difference with my calculations is 105 degrees of earth Comment deleted
that leads to near florida Comment deleted
Are there TZs which dont have full hour derivations? BC for me it was 10:02 Comment deleted
yep Comment deleted
+3:30 in our implementation Comment deleted
It' 4:50 for me Comment deleted
Wow didnt know that... Another reason to not implement time yourself Comment deleted
https://gist.github.com/timvisee/fcda9bbdff88d45cc9061606b4b923ca Comment deleted
> Months have either 28, 29, 30, or 31 days. …do they not? Is there month with 27 or 32 days? Comment deleted
Yes Comment deleted
Both Comment deleted
in soviet russia one February was only 14 days (because of calendar change from Julian to Gregorian) Comment deleted
that doesn't count Comment deleted
because I say so Comment deleted
lmao Comment deleted
Sounds fair Comment deleted
Eg days with more than 24 hours 👀 Comment deleted
to indicate hours after midnight 28:00 is "4:00 next day" Comment deleted
so they use a quantum timestamp Comment deleted
Would not say ots of after looking it up, but I guess, as India has one, it is population wise a not so small part... Comment deleted