Regex purist corrects LGBTQ+ to LGBTQ.* for true wildcard inclusivity

Description

The image shows a soft rainbow-gradient background with pastel bands of green, yellow, blue, pink, and purple fading into one another. Centered in bold black text is the full caption: “It should be LGBTQ.* not LGBTQ+ because the latter only matches LGBTQ, LGBTQQ, LGBTQQQ, etc.” The joke uses regular-expression syntax - “.*” as a greedy wildcard versus “+” as a one-or-more quantifier - to poke fun at overly literal developer minds applying pattern-matching rules to social terminology. It relies on knowledge of regex quantifiers and character classes, highlighting how developers instinctively think about edge-cases and precise string matching even in non-technical contexts. The humor resonates with engineers who have debated regex semantics or been pedantic about pattern correctness

Common Tags

RegularExpressions DeveloperHumor CodingHumor Syntax PatternMatching

Comments

Anonymous ★ Top Pick Updated the conduct policy to /LGBTQ.*/; legal bounced it back - apparently “greedy inclusivity” introduces unbounded scope in both regex and compliance budgets

Anonymous ★ Top Pick

Updated the conduct policy to /LGBTQ.*/; legal bounced it back - apparently “greedy inclusivity” introduces unbounded scope in both regex and compliance budgets
Anonymous

After 20 years of debugging regex patterns in production, you realize the real challenge isn't matching strings - it's explaining to stakeholders why your inclusive wildcard pattern just matched 'LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ' and brought down the authentication service
Anonymous

This is the kind of pedantic precision that makes senior engineers simultaneously groan and nod in approval - because we all know that one architect who would absolutely file a PR to change the acronym based on regex semantics, complete with a 47-slide deck explaining why '.*' provides better forward compatibility for future identity expansions than '+' ever could
Anonymous

Regex truth: + fails the LGBT base case, but * captures the full identity spectrum
Anonymous

Escape the '+': inclusivity shouldn’t be greedy - otherwise your regex multiplies Qs like scope creep multiplies features
Anonymous

Marketing wrote LGBTQ+; regex read Q{1,∞}. The validator rejected LGBTQIA - postmortem: inclusivity isn’t a quantifier; ship ^LGBTQ.*$
@Truth_0000 5y

Regex
Aleksander 5y

LGBTQ$ Let's stop here.
1. @Agent1378 5y
  
  LB is more than enough
  
  @t3alw1re 5y
  
  meh. 'G' is best.
  
  @Agent1378 5y
  
  S is the best
  
  @TERASKULL 5y
  
  S for single😎
  
  @t3alw1re 5y
  
  oh, my! @AgentLeon4000 really loves himself
  
  @Agent1378 5y
  
  S for the straight. Or if you prefer there also is A for AMDsexual
  
  @RiedleroD 5y
  
  I identify as Archsexual
  
  @prirai 5y
  
  Did we forget Nvidiasexual here?
  
  @feskow 5y
  
  novideo
  
  @t3alw1re 5y
  
  I'm ARMsexual, does it count?
  
  @prirai 5y
  
  Yeah, and Ubuntusexual can't be denied.
  
  @nyxi69 5y
  
  intelracial😘
@Tenoooo 5y

😂🌈🌈
@Dobreposhka 5y

You should be 100% of gay straightness. Men should love men and women should love men, no gays (and ofc no other sick people), only men lovers
1. @t3alw1re 5y
  
  I second to this
@beenotung 5y

LGTM
@nuntikov 5y

Oh my god, again someone is trying to parse xml via regex, The best way to find lgbtq elements is to look for attribute suicide-rate being higher than 40%
1. @RiedleroD 5y
  
  > higher than 40% jesus christ
2. @nuntikov 5y
  
  it's an attempted-suicide-rate, my bad
@Daler_XYZ 5y

Fuck regex Sorry for fuck
1. @RiedleroD 5y
  
  You don't have to be sorry for fuck, I fuck all the time.
2. @gDanix 5y
  
  Regex is not the problem!! The problem is the people that parse XML with regex: They don't do it, but they don't know it yet
@feskow 5y

LGBT[A-Z]*
@fie_n 5y

fuck it! Rights only!
@L2CacheGay 5y

LGBT++, formerly known as LGBT With Classes
1. @feskow 5y
  
  lmfao
2. @Nufunello 5y
  
  I'm dying 😂
3. @callofvoid0 5y
  
  🤣🤣🤣
@UshioCheng 5y

I prefer LGBT.* for more inclusiveness
1. @sylfn 5y
  
  * is the best for inclusiveness

Use J and K for navigation

Regex purist corrects LGBTQ+ to LGBTQ.* for true wildcard inclusivity

Description

Categories

Common Tags

Comments

More like this

Regex Procrastination Finally Becomes a Career Strategy

GNU Sed Learns Every Jutsu

The Developer Brain on Regex: Over-engineering Social Interactions