Godot Explains Save Encryption Politically
Description
The image is a dark-mode Godot Docs page with a left sidebar showing "GODOT DOCS", "stable", "Search docs", "Encrypting save games", "Why?", "How?", "Internationalization", "GUI", "Viewports", "Shading", "Networking", "Asset Library", "VR", "Read the Docs", and "v: stable". The main page breadcrumb reads "Docs » I/O » Encrypting save games", has an "Edit on GitHub" link, and the headings "Encrypting save games" and "Why?". The body explains, in unusually ideological prose, that a "capitalist oligarchy" drives mobile game consumption, in-app purchases, and virtual currency, then asks what would happen if someone edited saved games to assign items and currency without effort, concluding: "No, we definitely do not want that to happen, so let's see how to encrypt savegames and protect the world order." The joke is the mismatch between routine game-development documentation and a bleak social critique used to justify save-file encryption.
Comments
16Comment deleted
Most docs say "use AES"; Godot apparently opened with the political economy of whale retention.
Page not found Comment deleted
https://web.archive.org/web/20210104024155/https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/io/encrypting_save_games.html Comment deleted
I honestly hope it's a joke Comment deleted
Encryption simply offers more challenge. Comment deleted
I hate it when I'm reminded of the Orwellian reality we live in. Comment deleted
https://github.com/godotengine/godot-docs/commit/b872229427dddb9b749f46af597e85e25cf2955a Comment deleted
That's really good natured of them Comment deleted
>possessive plural noun >bruh Comment deleted
what Comment deleted
Just use "player" or "players" nobody does players' really Comment deleted
you can't do that tho without rebuilding the whole sentence, even then it won't have the same meaning Comment deleted
Sus Comment deleted
Bruh Comment deleted
I'm a fan of godot nevertheless Comment deleted
When the impostor has not done any suspiscious actions as of yet thus coming to any conclusion would be premature Comment deleted