The Bell Curve of Engineering Wisdom
Description
This image uses the IQ Bell Curve meme format to illustrate the evolution of a software developer's mindset. On the far left, representing a novice, a simply drawn character says, 'I'M JUST GONNA USE A SIMPLE SOLUTION.' At the peak of the curve, representing an average or mid-level developer, a crying, bespectacled 'Soyjak' character frantically insists, 'NOO! THE CODE MUST FOLLOW THE SOLID PRINCIPLES!!' On the far right, representing an expert, a serene, hooded character calmly states, 'I'M JUST GONNA USE A SIMPLE SOLUTION.' The meme satirizes the journey from naive simplicity to dogmatic adherence to rules, and finally to an experienced pragmatism where simplicity is chosen intentionally. It humorously critiques the tendency of intermediate developers to over-engineer solutions by rigidly applying design principles, whereas seasoned engineers have the wisdom to know when a simple approach is the most effective
Comments
26Comment deleted
The difference between the simple solution on the left and the simple solution on the right is about ten years of implementing the complex solutions in the middle
Architectural bell curve: junior writes a 25-line function, mid refactors it into six SOLID-approved interfaces and a DI container, senior deletes the lot and leaves one function with a comment - “KISS; the 3 AM pager can’t deserialize abstractions.”
The senior engineer who spent three sprints building a perfectly abstracted, dependency-injected, event-sourced solution just watched the intern solve it with a HashMap and a for loop in production
The most dangerous developer isn't the junior who doesn't know SOLID - it's the mid-level who just discovered it. After 15 years, you realize that sometimes a 50-line function that actually works is worth more than a perfectly abstracted, dependency-injected, interface-segregated architecture that takes three days to modify. The real senior move? Knowing when 'good enough' is actually better than 'architecturally pure,' because you've seen enough over-engineered systems collapse under their own abstraction weight
Architecture bell curve: junior ships a for-loop, principal ships a for-loop; middle adds six interfaces and an AbstractFactory so the for-loop can swap between its one implementation in the name of SOLID
SOLID peak: Where YAGNI goes to die, tripling LOC for that one edge case the auditor dreamed up
After a decade you learn MTTR beats SOLID bingo - the most maintainable class is the one you delete before the AbstractFactoryFactory PR even opens
SOLID is a simple solution. Comment deleted
A solid brick. Also simple. Comment deleted
u need to choose right simple solution Comment deleted
the code also can follow KISS and/or DRY principles Comment deleted
I prefer my code in a gaseous form tyvm Comment deleted
KISS!!! Comment deleted
You have to have enough experience to be able to foresee that your simple solution will not become a problem in the future Comment deleted
If it becomes a problem in the present, just fix it, future is just speculation. There're almost 50 year codebases in Fortran Comment deleted
When you need to test private methods you just write #define private public #include "testmedaddy.hpp" and test as usual 👌 Comment deleted
KISS and YAGNI literally mean "write only the code needed" Comment deleted
This is the reason why I posted this 😦 Comment deleted
but then it fully negates the meaning of the meme because it puts the small-minded guy, average guy and top-IQ guy in the completely same position Comment deleted
Welcome to the internet Comment deleted
я ненавижу постиронию Comment deleted
english please Comment deleted
Translation: I hate postirony Comment deleted
Btw, is usage of Russian in this comment also an instance of postirony? 🤔 Comment deleted
i guess so Comment deleted
да Comment deleted