Skip to content
DevMeme
1601 of 7590
OpenSource Post #1789 · source on Telegram

GitHub: Our Social Coding Platform

Description

The image is a meme styled as a Soviet-era propaganda poster, with the caption 'Did somebody say 'communism'?'. The poster features a smiling, friendly worker in a red shirt and an apron bearing the Git logo, extending his hand for a handshake. In the background, a construction site with a crane is visible, flying a red flag with the GitHub Octocat logo. The left side of the poster contains the GitHub logo and the slogans 'SOCIAL CODING' and 'BUILD SOFTWARE BETTER TOGETHER'. The meme humorously draws a parallel between the collaborative, collective ethos of open-source development on platforms like GitHub and the ideology of communism. It ironically reframes slogans like 'social coding' and 'build together' within a collectivist, political aesthetic. For experienced developers, it's a witty commentary on the quasi-socialist principles that underpin the open-source community, which often exist within a larger capitalist industry

Comments

7
Anonymous ★ Top Pick Our CI/CD pipeline is the five-year plan, pull requests are reviewed by the committee, and the only thing we're forking is the means of production
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    Our CI/CD pipeline is the five-year plan, pull requests are reviewed by the committee, and the only thing we're forking is the means of production

  2. Anonymous

    Open source is the only revolution where everyone seizes the means of production, but three exhausted maintainers still play the politburo deciding if your one-line README fix merits entry into the collective

  3. Anonymous

    "From each according to their commits, to each according to their merge conflicts" - the manifesto nobody asked for but every enterprise monorepo eventually implements

  4. Anonymous

    GitHub's marketing team really nailed the 'from each according to their ability, to each according to their merge conflicts' philosophy. Nothing says 'workers of the world unite' quite like 47 contributors arguing in a PR thread about whether to use tabs or spaces, while the original maintainer hasn't been seen in 6 months and the CI pipeline is perpetually red

  5. Anonymous

    Git promised decentralization; we put it all on one SaaS, added CODEOWNERS and branch protection, and called it “social” - the five‑year plan is your PR approval queue

  6. Anonymous

    GitHub communism: from each contributor according to their commits, to each PR according to the maintainer's benevolence

  7. Anonymous

    GitHub “social coding”: take a distributed VCS, centralize it behind CODEOWNERS, and call the five‑year plan a roadmap

Use J and K for navigation