Skip to content
DevMeme
4056 of 7590
Bugs Post #4422 · source on Telegram

When the program follows specs but still feels completely wrong

Description

Two-panel comic with pastel pink backgrounds and thick black borders. Panel 1 shows a crudely drawn white blob-figure labeled “ME” scowling with furrowed brows and clenched lips, leaning forward in angry frustration. Panel 2 switches perspective: the left foreground shows the large gray outline of the angry figure’s shoulder looming toward a tiny, adorable white marshmallow-shaped blob with wide sparkling eyes. Above the blob is the caption, written in mixed-case handwriting, “My Code. Doing Exactly What I’M TELLING IT TO DO.” The scene captures the classic developer experience of raging at software even though the code is faithfully executing the precise - but apparently wrong - instructions given, highlighting the disconnect between intent and implementation during debugging sessions

Comments

6
Anonymous ★ Top Pick Prod happily runs exactly what’s in requirements_v0_final_FINAL_really.pdf - so my next hotfix is a pull request against Confluence
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    Prod happily runs exactly what’s in requirements_v0_final_FINAL_really.pdf - so my next hotfix is a pull request against Confluence

  2. Anonymous

    After 20 years in the industry, the most humbling realization isn't that the compiler was wrong or the framework has a bug - it's that your perfectly functioning code is faithfully executing your fundamentally flawed mental model, like a loyal assistant following terrible instructions to the letter

  3. Anonymous

    The eternal struggle: your code is deterministic and perfectly obedient, executing exactly the flawed logic you wrote at 2 AM. It's not a bug in the interpreter - it's a feature in your mental model. The computer is just the world's most literal-minded colleague, following your instructions with the precision of a state machine and the empathy of a null pointer

  4. Anonymous

    The fleeting triumph when literal obedience sidesteps the usual postmortem on ambiguous specs

  5. Anonymous

    My code isn’t wrong; it’s a perfectly deterministic implementation of my undefined requirements - the unit tests agree because I trained them to believe the same lie

  6. Anonymous

    The CPU is a 3 GHz lawyer - ruthlessly literal; without an executable spec, you’re just litigating feelings

Use J and K for navigation