Skip to content
DevMeme
4564 of 7590
Languages Post #5006 · source on Telegram

All the languages on your resume versus the ones you truly master

Description

Two-panel photo meme. Top panel: a carved wooden pen holder jam-packed with pens, markers, and a highlighter; white caption text reads “Programming languages on your resume.” Bottom panel: the same holder now nearly empty, containing only a single blue-ink pen; white caption text reads “Languages where you can convert String to int without Google.” The visual joke contrasts the long list of technologies people claim on CVs with the very few languages they can remember basic type-conversion syntax for without searching. It pokes fun at résumé padding, knowledge retention, and how a seemingly trivial task - parsing a string to an integer - exposes the real depth of a developer’s language proficiency

Comments

44
Anonymous ★ Top Pick I can quote the CAP theorem backwards, but the second someone asks how to turn "42" into 42 my brain launches a tab war: atoi? strconv.Atoi? Integer.parseInt? - turns out being polyglot just means being fluent in Google
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    I can quote the CAP theorem backwards, but the second someone asks how to turn "42" into 42 my brain launches a tab war: atoi? strconv.Atoi? Integer.parseInt? - turns out being polyglot just means being fluent in Google

  2. Anonymous

    After 20 years in the industry, I've mastered 15 languages' hello world examples, but still can't remember if it's parseInt(), int.Parse(), Integer.valueOf(), or atoi() without checking - yet somehow my resume claims 'expert-level proficiency' in all of them

  3. Anonymous

    The brutal truth every senior engineer knows: you can claim fluency in a dozen languages on your resume, but the real test is whether you can write `parseInt()`, `int.Parse()`, `Integer.parseInt()`, or `std::stoi()` without opening a new tab. We've all been that architect in a design review who confidently discusses polyglot microservices architecture, then quietly Googles 'python string to int' when actually implementing the service. The gap between 'I've shipped production code in this' and 'I can write a for-loop without Stack Overflow' is the difference between a pen collection and that one reliable Bic you actually use

  4. Anonymous

    Polyglot resumes dazzle with rainbows, but prod code only trusts the black pen that parses strings from muscle memory - no Stack Overflow required

  5. Anonymous

    Resume says polyglot; the String→int test says polygoogler. If you can’t recall whether it’s atoi, stoi, Integer.parseInt, strconv.Atoi, or s.parse::<i32>(), you haven’t shipped with that language

  6. Anonymous

    My CV lists 12 languages; in prod my L1 cache remembers exactly three conversions - int(s), parseInt, and stoi - everything else page‑faults to Google

  7. @tarasanichin 3y

    😂

  8. @ilovethicktights 3y

    imho that's supposed to be sad, but at the same time its funny

  9. 扇子 3y

    a = "5" a = int(a)

  10. @LionElJonson 3y

    python, which is not even my primary 🥲

  11. @saidov 3y

    while writing in a less familiar language, I always try putting + before the variable to see if this works out: +a It works only in the damn JS

    1. @dsmagikswsa 3y

      I always choose Number(a) instead. Readability is more important

    2. @ZgGPuo8dZef58K6hxxGVj3Z2 3y

      😂😂😂😂💀

    3. @gizlu 3y

      In awk there is similar hack with str+0

  12. @mekosko 3y

    "0".parse::<i32>().unwrap()

  13. @azizhakberdiev 3y

    C++: wtf are u talking about?

  14. Deleted Account 3y

    C programmers be like:

    1. @LycanAnanas 3y

      atoi()

      1. @viktorrozenko 3y

        Do you remember its parameters tho?

        1. @LycanAnanas 3y

          just char*

          1. @viktorrozenko 3y

            Oh, right, it's itoa that was a pain in the ass

      2. @Stepan_Poznyak 3y

        And stoi()

  15. @LycanAnanas 3y

    returns int

  16. @LycanAnanas 3y

    as i remember errors are in errno

  17. @LycanAnanas 3y

    you can use sprintf it is easier

    1. @SamsonovAnton 3y

      Perhaps you meant sscanf?

      1. @LycanAnanas 3y

        As int to char* conv?

        1. @SamsonovAnton 3y

          As char* to int conversion, like stated in the meme.

          1. @LycanAnanas 3y

            I prefer atoi but yes sscanf is beter. But some one removed his comment with itoa..

  18. @theu_u 3y

    t = "1" as any as number Duck typing😶‍🌫

  19. @LycanAnanas 3y

    and this comment was to his replay..

  20. @ZgGPuo8dZef58K6hxxGVj3Z2 3y

    (-(-“13”))

    1. @ZgGPuo8dZef58K6hxxGVj3Z2 3y

      I am just kidding dont cancel me

      1. @NiKryukov 3y

        Maan can you send me your avatar? It's so hot and tasty

  21. @SamsonovAnton 3y

    !!(-(-"1")) @lokot0k, this is the definitive answer to your recent question. https://t.me/dev_meme/5002?comment=70693

  22. @NiKryukov 3y

    Wow thanks

  23. 𝙳𝚖𝚢𝚝𝚛𝚘 𝙼𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚔𝚘 3y

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. For any bugs and issues contact @dacoconutchemist

    1. @NiKryukov 3y

      *grateful beep beep boop boop*

    2. @callofvoid0 3y

      Seems like its finally working and we dont have to press the red button again

  24. @determ1n3d 3y

    to_string(5) in cpp

    1. @sylfn 3y

      other way (str -> int) C++: #include <sstream> int string_to_int(const string &s) { istringstream ss(s); int val; ss >> val; return val; }

      1. @determ1n3d 3y

        wasnt there a stoi func?

        1. @sylfn 3y

          idk, probably there is 🤷

  25. @determ1n3d 3y

    i mean, we can't use google, but we can probably use stackoverflow's own search?

Use J and K for navigation