Skip to content
DevMeme
6698 of 7435
Sam Altman Says If Jobs Get Wiped Out Maybe They Weren't Real Work
AI ML Post #7342, on Oct 28, 2025 in TG

Sam Altman Says If Jobs Get Wiped Out Maybe They Weren't Real Work

Description

A screenshot of a news article headline from Futurism, published Oct 12, 2025 by Frank Landymore. The headline reads: 'Sam Altman Says If Jobs Gets Wiped Out, Maybe They Weren't Even "Real Work" to Start With'. The subheadline adds: 'So that's where we're at.' Below is a photo of Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, looking upward with a green/yellow background. The article captures Altman's controversial stance that jobs displaced by AI may not have been meaningful work, a statement widely criticized as dismissive of workers' livelihoods. The editorial tone of the subheadline ('So that's where we're at') signals clear disapproval

Comments

21
Anonymous ★ Top Pick Sam Altman redefining 'real work' as 'things AI can't do yet' is quite the moving goalpost - currently running at O(n) towards zero
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    Sam Altman redefining 'real work' as 'things AI can't do yet' is quite the moving goalpost - currently running at O(n) towards zero

  2. Anonymous

    It's the ultimate 'it's not a bug, it's a feature' argument for the global economy. If your job can be replaced by a glorified language model, it was just a legacy API waiting to be deprecated

  3. Anonymous

    Apparently the only 'real work' left after AGI arrives is convincing VCs that your prompt engineering startup is worth a billion dollars

  4. Anonymous

    When your CEO's take on job displacement is so tone-deaf it makes your production outage look like a minor incident. At least our bugs have better empathy for end users

  5. Anonymous

    Sam's right - your React boilerplate vanishes, but that COBOL monolith laughs in the face of the singularity

  6. @mrYakov 8mo

    can we already replace CEO with AI to stop this BS and focus on real work ?

  7. @vladyslav_google 8mo

    Sam, why are u gay ?

  8. @adm877 8mo

    Why "jobs gets"? After plural should be without s

    1. Sergey A 8mo

      He meant Steve Jobs, singular.

      1. @adm877 8mo

        Thought the same actually.

    2. @vladyslav_google 8mo

      Because he referred to Steve Jobs 🍏

    3. @artem_sidorin 8mo

      this probably can fall under notional agreement category described here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/notional-agreement-subject-verb-principle-proximity

      1. @kbulygin 8mo

        Well, if he meant all jobs, that's even more 😐-y.

      2. @azizhakberdiev 8mo

        yes, but jobs isn't an area of study

    4. @kbulygin 8mo

      That's his full name: "Sam Altman Says If Jobs" ("Sam" is obviously a diminutive).

  9. @adm877 8mo

    Guys…

  10. @ashit_axar 8mo

    He is right in a wrong way.

  11. @nightingazer 8mo

    is it a hard requirement for every billion+ dollar company ceo to be the most unbearable piece of shit you've ever seen in your life?

  12. @ZgGPuo8dZef58K6hxxGVj3Z2 8mo

    Nice... That shows little to no understanding of how jobs work

  13. @jaaaaded 8mo

    he's right though

  14. @Waffles000 1w

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9lDTdLQnSQo&pp=ygUeTHVrZSBzbWl0aCB0aGUgZWNvbm9teSBpcyBmYWtl

Use J and K for navigation