Skip to content
DevMeme
6777 of 7435
Google Gemini Model Picker Labels 3 Pro as 'lmao' Instead of 'New'
AI ML Post #7431, on Nov 18, 2025 in TG

Google Gemini Model Picker Labels 3 Pro as 'lmao' Instead of 'New'

Description

A screenshot of Google's Gemini AI model selection dropdown on a dark-themed mobile interface. The header reads 'Choose your model'. Two options are shown: '3 Pro' described as 'Cutting-edge intelligence' with a blue pill-shaped badge reading 'lmao' (instead of the usual 'New' badge), and '2.5 Pro' described as 'Reasoning, math & code' with a standard blue 'New' badge. Below the dropdown, the currently selected model shows '2.5 Flash' with a dropdown arrow and a microphone icon. The humor comes from someone editing the 'New' badge on the 3 Pro model to say 'lmao' instead, mocking either the model's capabilities or Google's marketing of it as 'cutting-edge intelligence.'

Comments

42
Anonymous ★ Top Pick When even the UI badge can't keep a straight face about your model being 'cutting-edge intelligence,' you know the benchmark scores were written by the marketing team
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    When even the UI badge can't keep a straight face about your model being 'cutting-edge intelligence,' you know the benchmark scores were written by the marketing team

  2. Anonymous

    My ideal model selector: 'Does what the docs say' with a 'Finally' button, and 'Hallucinates a new sorting algorithm' with an 'I'm feeling lucky' button

  3. @NaNmber 7mo

    for free!

  4. @ZmEYkA_3310 7mo

    I know :(

    1. @NaNmber 7mo

      what a banger memes you post holy lmao

      1. @linuxhasan 7mo

        I agree

      2. @ZmEYkA_3310 7mo

        ty lmao

  5. @advanced_name_1 7mo

    Lmao

  6. dev_meme 7mo

    Oh ffs

    1. @RiedleroD 7mo

      I don't understand. what's this about?

      1. dev_meme 7mo

        It was about Gemini 3

        1. @RiedleroD 7mo

          ok but what's the context here

          1. dev_meme 7mo

            Well, there was a lot of hype about how good it is expected to be

            1. @RiedleroD 7mo

              oh ok

              1. dev_meme 7mo

                https://t.me/devs_chat/176513 This screenshot is about Demis, not about Elon, just to make it clear Just coz he isn't one to make hype out of nothing

                1. @RiedleroD 7mo

                  fwiw this does seem to be a true OG in the AI scene, going back to alphago and such. people like him I do have some respect for

                  1. @RiedleroD 7mo

                    still, I don't believe it's going to be anything revolutionary. just yet another marginal improvement

                    1. @DerKnerd 7mo

                      yeah probably, and one main purpose I have for LLM assistance is just converting between languages, creating CTEs from JSON data I have to map arrays of objects to sql upserts and for that most models work more than well already

                    2. dev_meme 7mo

                      12 marginal improvements over the year year across the market is pretty good tho

                      1. @RiedleroD 7mo

                        we've gone from "obviously wrong" to "wrong in ways that are not so obvious" to "technically sound in isolation, but WILL cause problems in context of the rest of the codebase"

                        1. @DerKnerd 7mo

                          I don't even think the main issue is the coding part, but that the LLMs get better with time in being convincing even if they talk bullcrap

                          1. @RiedleroD 7mo

                            yea I mean part of getting better at convincing you it's good is actually making it good, but still it's not like an actual programmer thinking about how the code is going to be used down the road and such and such. and the amount of epiphanies I've had while working on code, where I completely restructured the thing I was implementing because I figured out the way I wanted to do it was bullshit, … yeah

                            1. dev_meme 7mo

                              >> completely restructured the thing I was implementing because I figured out the way I wanted to do it was bullshit, But when people find out the way AI goes is bullshit they go crazy and curse the LLM, instead of doing what they would do if they worked without it! Why so?

                              1. @RiedleroD 7mo

                                …because the AI won't tell them that, and you have to have a deep understanding of the codebase to figure out that you're attempting bullshit

                              2. @DerKnerd 7mo

                                the reason for that, from my point, if the ai creates bullcrap i don't know the reasoning or thinking behind it. When I do it myself I do know how I got there

                                1. dev_meme 7mo

                                  Yeah, likelly, but this is also true with, for example, coworkers That meme "managers were always vibecoding" not an actual meme, it was more like actual fact

                                  1. @DerKnerd 7mo

                                    you do know, I can talk to coworkers to get their reasoning behind it right?

                                    1. dev_meme 7mo

                                      Why wouldn't you talk to LLM then? Sonnet/GPT-5 are pretty well at explaining their reasoning, and you can "catch" their hand to correct direction of work

                                      1. @DerKnerd 7mo

                                        I actually made horrific experience with that approach, it just starts hallucinating crap at some point

                                        1. @pdsnrc 7mo

                                          for some reason I just imagine someone very pissed about hiring a schizo programmer

                                          1. @DerKnerd 7mo

                                            oh boy, that might be interesting, coding as a person with splitpersonality disorder, one personality only codes in perl while the other won't touch anything but assembler

                                            1. @RiedleroD 7mo

                                              tell me about it 💀 I fucking hate being plural

                                              1. @DerKnerd 7mo

                                                well I had voices but they were mostly a code review you really don't want to hear

                                                1. @RiedleroD 7mo

                                                  bruh

                                          2. @RiedleroD 7mo

                                            "sorry for the downtime, friedrich hallucinated passing CI and pushed to prod"

                        2. dev_meme 7mo

                          This is "person-in-the-loop" responsibility to catch those, we used to call them programmers before 🌚 The same thing was always happening, thus "minimum approves" requirement for PRs

                          1. @RiedleroD 7mo

                            …you only know the codebase if you touch a good portion of the code yourself

                            1. dev_meme 7mo

                              Or if documentation is well structured, and domains of responsibility are reasonably separated

                              1. @RiedleroD 7mo

                                I will say, AI is probably ok for generating docs. and no, reading docs is not a substitute for knowing the code

          2. dev_meme 7mo

            And it being SOTA on lmarena preliminary confirms it but personally I will need a few days to play with it

  7. @RiedleroD 7mo

    very funny. I love masturbation

  8. @RiedleroD 7mo

    not officially diagnosed, but yes

Use J and K for navigation