AI ML
Post #7431, on Nov 18, 2025 in TG
Google Gemini Model Picker Labels 3 Pro as 'lmao' Instead of 'New'
Description
A screenshot of Google's Gemini AI model selection dropdown on a dark-themed mobile interface. The header reads 'Choose your model'. Two options are shown: '3 Pro' described as 'Cutting-edge intelligence' with a blue pill-shaped badge reading 'lmao' (instead of the usual 'New' badge), and '2.5 Pro' described as 'Reasoning, math & code' with a standard blue 'New' badge. Below the dropdown, the currently selected model shows '2.5 Flash' with a dropdown arrow and a microphone icon. The humor comes from someone editing the 'New' badge on the 3 Pro model to say 'lmao' instead, mocking either the model's capabilities or Google's marketing of it as 'cutting-edge intelligence.'
Use J and K for navigation
Comments
42Comment deleted
When even the UI badge can't keep a straight face about your model being 'cutting-edge intelligence,' you know the benchmark scores were written by the marketing team
My ideal model selector: 'Does what the docs say' with a 'Finally' button, and 'Hallucinates a new sorting algorithm' with an 'I'm feeling lucky' button
for free! Comment deleted
I know :( Comment deleted
what a banger memes you post holy lmao Comment deleted
I agree Comment deleted
ty lmao Comment deleted
Lmao Comment deleted
Oh ffs Comment deleted
I don't understand. what's this about? Comment deleted
It was about Gemini 3 Comment deleted
ok but what's the context here Comment deleted
Well, there was a lot of hype about how good it is expected to be Comment deleted
oh ok Comment deleted
https://t.me/devs_chat/176513 This screenshot is about Demis, not about Elon, just to make it clear Just coz he isn't one to make hype out of nothing Comment deleted
fwiw this does seem to be a true OG in the AI scene, going back to alphago and such. people like him I do have some respect for Comment deleted
still, I don't believe it's going to be anything revolutionary. just yet another marginal improvement Comment deleted
yeah probably, and one main purpose I have for LLM assistance is just converting between languages, creating CTEs from JSON data I have to map arrays of objects to sql upserts and for that most models work more than well already Comment deleted
12 marginal improvements over the year year across the market is pretty good tho Comment deleted
we've gone from "obviously wrong" to "wrong in ways that are not so obvious" to "technically sound in isolation, but WILL cause problems in context of the rest of the codebase" Comment deleted
I don't even think the main issue is the coding part, but that the LLMs get better with time in being convincing even if they talk bullcrap Comment deleted
yea I mean part of getting better at convincing you it's good is actually making it good, but still it's not like an actual programmer thinking about how the code is going to be used down the road and such and such. and the amount of epiphanies I've had while working on code, where I completely restructured the thing I was implementing because I figured out the way I wanted to do it was bullshit, … yeah Comment deleted
>> completely restructured the thing I was implementing because I figured out the way I wanted to do it was bullshit, But when people find out the way AI goes is bullshit they go crazy and curse the LLM, instead of doing what they would do if they worked without it! Why so? Comment deleted
…because the AI won't tell them that, and you have to have a deep understanding of the codebase to figure out that you're attempting bullshit Comment deleted
the reason for that, from my point, if the ai creates bullcrap i don't know the reasoning or thinking behind it. When I do it myself I do know how I got there Comment deleted
Yeah, likelly, but this is also true with, for example, coworkers That meme "managers were always vibecoding" not an actual meme, it was more like actual fact Comment deleted
you do know, I can talk to coworkers to get their reasoning behind it right? Comment deleted
Why wouldn't you talk to LLM then? Sonnet/GPT-5 are pretty well at explaining their reasoning, and you can "catch" their hand to correct direction of work Comment deleted
I actually made horrific experience with that approach, it just starts hallucinating crap at some point Comment deleted
for some reason I just imagine someone very pissed about hiring a schizo programmer Comment deleted
oh boy, that might be interesting, coding as a person with splitpersonality disorder, one personality only codes in perl while the other won't touch anything but assembler Comment deleted
tell me about it 💀 I fucking hate being plural Comment deleted
well I had voices but they were mostly a code review you really don't want to hear Comment deleted
bruh Comment deleted
"sorry for the downtime, friedrich hallucinated passing CI and pushed to prod" Comment deleted
This is "person-in-the-loop" responsibility to catch those, we used to call them programmers before 🌚 The same thing was always happening, thus "minimum approves" requirement for PRs Comment deleted
…you only know the codebase if you touch a good portion of the code yourself Comment deleted
Or if documentation is well structured, and domains of responsibility are reasonably separated Comment deleted
I will say, AI is probably ok for generating docs. and no, reading docs is not a substitute for knowing the code Comment deleted
And it being SOTA on lmarena preliminary confirms it but personally I will need a few days to play with it Comment deleted
very funny. I love masturbation Comment deleted
not officially diagnosed, but yes Comment deleted