Some Devs Just Want to Watch the Build Burn
Description
This meme uses the iconic 'Disaster Girl' template, which features a young girl with a subtle, mischievous smirk looking towards the camera while a house burns in the background. Firefighters and a fire truck are visible, attending to the blaze. The image is captioned with bold, white text: 'BUILD IS BROKEN' at the top, and 'PUSH ANYWAYS' at the bottom. The meme humorously captures a moment of ultimate developer malpractice or nihilism. A 'broken build' signifies that the code fails fundamental checks and cannot be compiled or integrated, effectively halting development for everyone. To 'push anyways' is to knowingly merge this faulty code into the main repository, an act of sabotage that can bring down testing environments or even production. The girl's expression perfectly embodies the attitude of a developer who, due to burnout, pressure, or sheer recklessness, decides to commit chaos
Comments
10Comment deleted
A junior dev breaks the build and panics. A senior dev breaks the build, blames a race condition in the CI runner, and pushes anyway
Around here we call merging on a red pipeline “unscheduled chaos engineering” - legal says rebranding is cheaper than fixing the tests
After 15 years in the industry, you realize the real continuous integration is continuously integrating hotfixes into production while the original fix is still being debugged in staging
When your CI/CD pipeline is red but the sprint ends in 10 minutes and the PM is breathing down your neck about that 'critical feature' - so you add '--no-verify' to your git hooks, force push to main, and walk away whistling. The PagerDuty alerts can wait until Monday. After all, it's not a production incident if you're not on-call when it happens
Red build? That's CI's way of saying 'prod needs excitement' - ship it for the blameless postmortem
Red pipeline? That’s our org’s feature flag for cowboy mode - git push --no-verify and let SRE practice rollback-driven development at 2am
Build is broken? Push anyway - trunk-based development where observability is QA and the pager is your linter
Well, why not?) My commit most likely is not gonna make it any worse :) Comment deleted
That's why it is told to do not push without testing Comment deleted
Don't care just push it Comment deleted