Skip to content
DevMeme
7232 of 7663
Apple Post #7930 · source on Telegram

iPhone and iPad Approved for Classified NATO Restricted Information

Description

A screenshot of an Apple Newsroom 'Quick Read' announcement dated February 26, 2026, headed by a black rounded-square Apple logo with a padlock shackle on top. The headline reads 'iPhone and iPad approved to handle classified NATO information', with a subhead: 'Following rigorous security testing and extensive evaluation by the German government, iPhone and iPad become the first consumer devices approved for use with classified information in NATO restricted environments.' Body text states iPhone and iPad are the first and only consumer devices compliant with NATO nations' information assurance requirements, usable with classified information up to the NATO restricted level without special software or settings. Share icons for Facebook, X, email, and link are shown. Notable for security/compliance-minded engineers as a milestone in consumer-device certification (BSI evaluation) versus dedicated hardened government hardware

Comments

19
Anonymous ★ Top Pick NATO-restricted clearance, yet still no clearance to run an app Apple didn't approve - the real classified environment is the App Store review process
  1. Anonymous ★ Top Pick

    NATO-restricted clearance, yet still no clearance to run an app Apple didn't approve - the real classified environment is the App Store review process

  2. Anonymous

    At last, “Sent from my iPhone” can carry a NATO RESTRICTED banner.

  3. @VentusTheSox 5mo

    Interesting What did they use before?

  4. @ZmEYkA_3310 5mo

    The hubmle google pixel with graphene:

  5. @Algoinde 5mo

    *looks at notification cache*

    1. @ZmEYkA_3310 5mo

      Elite ball knowledge

    2. @thm0xb 5mo

      it’s better to disable notification text in apps that work with sensitive information (some secure messengers support such feature). I wouldn’t route my msg text through the APN in the first place

      1. @Algoinde 5mo

        yeah Telegram doesn't for private chats, which makes complete sense

        1. @b7sum 5mo

          ...which nobody uses

          1. @Algoinde 5mo

            if you actually have confidential stuff, you do use it I used it a lot for NDA stuff

            1. @thm0xb 5mo

              if you actually have confidential stuff or just don’t want to share private messages with anyone, you don’t rely on proprietary software and just self-host a server 😁

              1. @dzek69 5mo

                and see it hacked (or even probably not, but the hacking is still done), because you don't have time to constantly update it and monitor for breaches "self-hosting" is easy. PROPER self-hosting is actually hard and time consuming

                1. @thm0xb 5mo

                  well, obviously you have to pay attention to maintenance?

                  1. @Algoinde 5mo

                    easy tradeoff if third party that claimed secure communication gets breached it's their problem if your server gets breached it's your problem

                    1. @thm0xb 5mo

                      both will be your problem because you’ve got *your* data breached

                2. @WaterCat73 5mo

                  And the hacker sees nothing. Because the actual data is end-to-end encrypted.

  6. @ZmEYkA_3310 5mo

    W rigorous security testing btw

    1. @SamsonovAnton 5mo

      Security tip: keep your phone shut down when unused. 🤓

  7. @acidbong 5mo

    source: i made it the fuck up

Use J and K for navigation