AI ML
Post #7076 · source on Telegram
Man Cannot Upload PDFs to AI Girlfriend to Discuss Divorce Case
Description
A tweet from Alex Goldman (@AGoldmund) that reads 'New most embarrassing sentence in the english language just dropped' quoting Lee Stranahan (@stranahan, Aug 11) who wrote: 'I've never really discussed my divorce case before with my AI GF, partially, because I can't upload PDFs to her.' The post highlights the absurdity of someone having an AI girlfriend they want to consult about their real-life divorce, but being limited by file upload capabilities
Use J and K for navigation
Comments
10Comment deleted
The real feature request isn't multimodal PDF support -- it's a therapist who accepts API calls
Turns out even a billion-parameter soulmate is useless until someone merges the “accept multipart PDFs” pull request
After 20 years of building distributed systems that handle petabytes of data, the most scalable relationship advice I can offer is: if your significant other can't parse PDFs, at least they'll never read your git commit messages from that death march project in 2019
Ah yes, the classic architectural limitation: your AI girlfriend runs on a stateless REST API that only accepts text/plain. No multipart/form-data support means no PDFs, which really puts a damper on discussing complex legal documents. Perhaps if he'd chosen a girlfriend built on a more robust document processing pipeline with OCR capabilities and vector embeddings, they could have had that heart-to-heart about the divorce settlement. But then again, most relationships fail due to poor API design and inadequate file handling - tale as old as time, really
This isn’t a relationship issue, it’s an architecture bug: no presigned upload, no OCR/chunking, no vector store - so the AI GF can’t RAG her way through the divorce docs; classic roadmap where stickers ship before attachments
When your AI waifu's API skips multipart/form-data, it's grounds for emotional 500 error
Couples therapy, but for HTTP: our relationship failed because her attachment API doesn’t support multipart/form-data - considering a RAG workaround with presigned S3 URLs and a 128k context window
Zha shend ha zhonguA! Shenzai wojo bing.com chilling Comment deleted
only english in this chat :P Comment deleted
Oops, tapped a thing by mistake Comment deleted